GoddessDustyGold
Posts: 2822
Joined: 4/11/2004 From: Arizona Status: offline
|
There is a domneering quality to your profile that is a bit offputting for Me. But then, I am not seeking a submissive...I do seek slaves. And you make the point of differentiating in your profile, by stating up front that you are a submissive and not a slave. I would, however, be interested in your definition of a "submissive" vs. a "slave". That might help to clarify and few things. That said, there is, as already stated, better ways to come across and may make your profile a bit more inviting and warm. Right now I get the imrpession that you have already decided how it is going to go, and what the proper FemDom should be. That may work for you, but we are human and we do not all fit into neat little boxes. A good example of what bears out My initial impression in reading your profile is this second post: quote:
My understanding is that a D/s relationship has components of TPE but a LTR cannot possibly stay at such a fever pitch. That is unsustainable. All negotiations must begin from a position of strength. Reconciling differences means that both sides need to give up something to come to an agreement. That may be your understanding, but for many FemDoms, there are no "components" of TPE. Total means total. Different people certainly have different priorities, but to assume that everything is negotiated on a fair and equal basis, and both must give things up to make it work is arrogant, in My Opinion. Making those priorities match is the key. Not negotiating and compromising. There is no "fever pitch" about it. Either you can meet Her expectations and She yours, or there is just not a good match. It is an ongoing relationship dynamic, and if you cannot sustain that, then you need to be clear about it. I already had that impression, but others may not, and that could cause misunderstandings. So this quoted response would solidify My initial impression and why you would not be of specific interest to Me as a potential relationship. I am certainly open to being very fond of a boy and knowing that he has a hard limit regarding a certain form of play. I can always get that satisfaction elsewhere. But in the day to day "who is in charge" scenario, I am in charge. Like it and do it (with a smile, of course!), or don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out. And most Ladies I kow who are seeking D/s or M/s relationships have that same mindset. I completely respect where you are coming from, and I am sure you will eventually find the Lady who is right for you and the type of D/s relationship you seek. I may want to "dominate" (verb) but I am a "dominant" (adjective) Female. In the terminology of this lifestyle, it is shortened to Dominant. Not "dominate". That is an irritant to many of us on the boards, and, I am sure, to many who are just browisng profiles. You might want to consider fixing that. Welcome the boards and good luck in your search!
< Message edited by GoddessDustyGold -- 9/27/2007 11:29:59 PM >
_____________________________
Dusty They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety B Franklin Don't blame Me ~ I didn't vote for either of them The Hidden Kingdom
|