Owner4SexSlave
Posts: 1311
Joined: 4/4/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: XaviersXian greetings to all, xian feels that, in her own relationship, she has no "rights", only needs. Her Master fulfills what He sees as her needs: food, shelter, time outdoors, keeping her mentally (and physically) safe (no broken bones or situations that could negatively affect her health) .... the rest is up to Him, including (if she ever asked) granting her release from the relationship. she wishes all well, xian - Property of Xavier, House of Logos. This one brings great honour to the "House of Logos" with her words. I find here the logic in needs vs. rights, when applied to TPE relationships. Where a Master will take care of the basic needs of a slave. Where the slave freely surrenders her choice to excerise her rights and freedoms. I realize that many do not care for the ways of the Gorean lifestyle. However, I have found that there is a set code of conduct and a manner of general honor and discipline that is established in the Gorean community. Where a slave should not be concerned nor worried about needs being met by thier Master/owner. For TPE relationships, perhaps this is best model. That a save has the right for their needs to be taken care of, that everything else is at the descretion of their Master. Again, I still stress that like minded people enter into a M/s relationship. That this should resolve many issues ahead of time. For non TPE relationships, this is and always will be a bit of a game of negoation going on. If a Master/Dom desires a higher level of power/control over a submissve then she is willing to give, this is a source of conflict. Everybody is not into having TPE or high levels of power exchanged. Rights, freedoms, rules and everything under the sun varies from one relationship to another. If two people can not agree upon a matter, then the laws that govern must should be applied. The rights, freedoms, rules and liberties and power exchanged between two people is a personal relationship matter between two people. It is nearly impossiable for anybody outside of that relationship to say otherwise. However, it is apparent that as human beings we should have our most basic needs met inorder to function and survive. That perhaps we could view or label needs as rights, however these are essentially a requirement. At the very least, it would be safe to make the statement... A slave has the Right to have their human needs, not wants, met. This is the core of a TPE M/s relationship. There is something called Maslow pyramid. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maslow's_hierarchy_of_needs there are also other models such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_human_needs Perhaps, in terms of a slaves most basic rights are to understand needs. Things such as Medical conditions should be taken into consideration as well. I would say without question a slave has the "Right" to have their Fundamental or Basic needs met. I would also go further that a submissive that does not want a full TPE relationship, has the right to not be treated as a TPE slave, that they have the right to not only have their Needs met, but the right to want to have various WANTS. Something besides needs. If at anytime, either a TPE Slave or Non TPE Submissive.. seeks to excercise the legal rights they freely gave up, they legally have the right to do as such.
|