|
Bobkgin -> RE: Machismo and BDSM (10/11/2007 6:30:13 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance
Bob, I can't even express here what I think of you eluding to a private correspondence in this thread. Suffice it to say, I hope if I find myself compelled to join in on one of your threads again, that I delete my CM account first..
I am curious as to how many times you've said this when submissives talk about the "wannabes" who have written them and what was said?
Or someone seeks advice by telling people what they were instructed to do through correspondence?
I hope you are as firm with all of them as you've just been with me.
On edit:
Come to think of it, isn't it odd that I've referred to support through correspondence several times without you commenting on it, but I mention Velvet's collarchat 'enemies list' as sent through correspondence and you respond thus?
Rather selective, isn't it?
On 2nd edit:
Come to think of it, if you took that attitude towards all private correspondence, that would include anything anyone reported about another person, be it through conversation, phone call, letter, chat, email, etc.
Every time someone asks for help they could not report any of the details regarding what the other person said (or did?).
Descriptions of conversations with past lovers or current suitors would have to be avoided (and I am not even speaking of quotes, as I've neither quoted nor paraphrased anything out of my correspondence with Velvet).
Bit stringent, don't you think?
If someone was told to do something wrong by an off-line individual, how is this someone to come here and ask for guidance if no one is willing to participate in a thread where a private conversation is described?
|
|
|
|
