Handspankingdom
Posts: 20
Joined: 7/6/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FTopinMichigan I do agree with this, muzz. If someone has an aversion to larger people, let them have it listed in thier preferences, in their profile (or be honest and upfront), but in the same turn, I think it should be that more people should also be honest about their own body shape, when initially communicating. While I've never met a man that lied about his weight, I have found a few that added to their height, and MANY that have lied about their age, or "looking younger" than their years. It happens. Handspankingdom writes: FTopinMichigan, your thoughts are correct, and certainly honesty is a two way street. I recently had a man tell, on first PM, that he didn't like BBWs. As someone working hard to get stronger (and lose weight), I found it offensive for him to presume that I wasn't one, or that I would agree with his assessment. Handspankingdom writes: Merely stating that you do not have a 'preference' for BBW's or tattoos is not necessarily an attack. As humans we are quick to internalize these comments. I find it admirable that he relayed this to you on your first PM session; this way no ones time was wasted. Communicating on-line- or in chat, is often anonymous (for privacy reasons for many) and frankly, most are somewhat ambiguous about themselves until a level of trust/friendship has been established (I found your profile nice, but noticed you too were a bit ambiguous about your body size). For what it's worth, I see this as perfectly normal. I seriously don't have issue with "preferences"...but I do have issue with rude comments, and presumptions. In the same conversation, he explained how he didn't like women with tattooed bodies. I have several tattoos, so you can imagine how much fun I had chatting with this man. (I think he got the message now though. ) Handspankingdom writes: I think you're being a bit heavy handed ;-) I agree there is no need for rudeness, but to express that your preference is not for BBW's or tattoos as rude, would depend on how it was relayed. I am not seeking a morbidly obese sub, but I would not close my eyes to one that was pleasingly plump and eager to please. I have also bottomed for larger women and enjoyed this very much-- hey, it's good to get insight from both sides of the paddle. Also, in another forum (where the topic came up yet again), I mentioned that I felt sub ladies, that were larger in size, actually had MORE confidence and self esteem than their vanilla counterparts. I think a sub, in general, has a "stronger" self image, to be able to express and enjoy themselves. Handspankingdom writes: I agree with the latter part of your statement, in that it does take a person who is comfortable in their skin to be a sub. Whether or not they have a better self image than their vanilla counterparts is a matter of debate, but if this is your experience, who am I to argue? To be honest (and generalizing again), I've found submissive ladies having far more self esteem and confidence than the what I've seen in the sub men that I've met. Some even have more than a few Dommes that I've met. Handspankingdom writes: I feel this has more to do with the way society portrays men (chiefly loathing women's advocacy groups- who constantly demonize men). If a women is a sub, she's exploring her sexuality, if a guy is a sub, he's a dirty minded, self gratifying, wanker (I often hear and see the word 'worthless'), trying to get his rocks off. In addition, how many female dommes are seeking a female sub for financial domination? In general, many female dommes seem to be far less tolerant/understanding/accomodating of male subs then female subs (chiefly because the female sub has broader options) and society has branded men as 'thinking with their penises'. To this extent, it is not a wonder to me why orgasm denial, cbt and pro-domination has found a serious following amongst female dommes (they seem to love and hate our appendages all at the same time). You conclude your message by sharing your experiences with male subs and formulating the opinion that female subs are more confident and having more than one domme would suggest they have a greater level of self esteem? This is self fulfilling logic and tradition seems to play a role in this. Many female dommes seeking complete control will not allow their male sub to 'play' with others as they are seeking property (or worse their past romances may have capsized because of a cheating mate, and taking these romantic frustrations out on the sub results). Lastly, although many may deny it tooth and nail, the DNA of women tends toward a less promiscuous nature, where as the male species (as a whole) tends to be more casual about such contact. Like it or not, the world would be far less challenging and populous without us. Regards! ;-) M
|