MadRabbit -> RE: Is it ok for a Master to compare himself with God? (10/12/2007 8:33:11 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TreasureKY quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit quote:
ORIGINAL: TreasureKY I can understand saying that submission is somewhat like a religion, but to insinuate that a dominant is his submissive's God is going a bit far. Oh yeah? Why? Because the OP's excerpt was "submission is a religion and the Dom is god". Note my emphasis, please. The most prevalent understanding of the word "religion" is a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs. The most thought-of idea of "God" is a being conceived as the perfect, omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions. As I stated fairly clearly in my original comment, while I can understand saying that submission is somewhat like a religion, the blanket generalization of "submission is a religion and the Dom is god" is going a bit far. Again, please note my emphasis. Of course, that is my opinion. If it is your desire that your submissive consider you to be the infallible, all-knowing, all-seeing creator of the universe, then that is your perogative. I don't believe FirmhandKY would be comfortable with me viewing him in the same light. quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit We have an interesting term for Dommes I hear often called "Goddess". Is this attempt at divinity and worship okie dokie while a male taking this disposition is a "little too extreme" since he is brushing up against the big male G word of the Christian patriarchy that dominates American society? So...some guy has a kink for labeling himself as "God"? Why is that any less repugnant than a female taking on the label of "Goddess"? Perhaps because we dont take the idea of female divinity seriously? While "Goddess" does not hold quite the same connotations as "God", I consider the concept to be just as extreme. You make a large assumption that my comments indicate otherwise. quote:
ORIGINAL: MadRabbit Sure, a dominant can be a God to his slave without it going to far if you define "God" as a concept that human beings beleive in, find inspiration in, and submit their lives to the image of in an attempt to strive to improve and be better? If one replace the pop culture phrase of "What would Jesus do?" with "What would Master do?", then in a sense, a dominant can very much be like a god to a submissive. Someone she is inspired by and strives to improve and grow in his image. I believe my comment that "submission is somewhat like a religion" and the remainder of my post clearly imply my agreement with the idea that it is acceptable for a dominant to be viewed as having similar influence in his submissive's life. I'm not sure just exactly what about my comments got your knickers in a wad other than perhaps not reading carefully or past the first sentence. My knickers dont get in a wad much even if it seems like that. I was mostly trying to push an alternative point of view. But...fair enough...after reading your reponse, I realize I should have put more thought into your post before responding.
|
|
|
|