Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

BOTTOMS


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> BOTTOMS Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:20:48 AM   
YesMistressIrish


Posts: 1135
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Calif
Status: offline
This is what I wrote to support here on cm:
 
Please add these categories to CM:
 
BOTTOM: As you know, so many, many men say 'submissive' when they mean BOTTOM. So, they lie to get close and hope to be topped. BOTTOM as a category has a huge base here on cm. Certainly much bigger than submissive?
TOPs: For all the bdsm fun. they will look for bottoms and not subs.

Cm is unintentionally forcing men to lie. Let's give all those bottoms and dommes a break and add the category: BOTTOM
Let's save hundreds of hrs and allow people get to rt much faster because the men get to say who and what they really are. For women also, of course, but it's mostly men who have to lie here.

We really need to have these options for profiles and their own forums!
Irish
 
What do you all think of these as an added category and forum titles?
 
Irish

< Message edited by YesMistressIrish -- 10/22/2007 6:22:51 AM >
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:31:38 AM   
phoenixinchains


Posts: 2534
Joined: 4/5/2007
From: i live here
Status: offline




i think the idea has merit, and should enclude the (furries?) people that liken themselves to creatures. but i'm not in the position to make those calls, and that's probly a good thing
phoenix



(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:34:42 AM   
RRafe


Posts: 2060
Joined: 8/29/2007
Status: offline
I agree. Far too much pressure on this site to "submit" or "Dominate".

When all that a lot of us want-is really just some fun.

_____________________________

I seem to be some wierd combination of Ren and Stimpy

(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:37:23 AM   
phoenixinchains


Posts: 2534
Joined: 4/5/2007
From: i live here
Status: offline




and how about some big icon for those who are here to do that cyber-stuff, and an icon for us that aren't in to that. this feature could save me a few head-aches when i go to answer my mail...
phoenix



(in reply to RRafe)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:38:56 AM   
YesMistressIrish


Posts: 1135
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Calif
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phoenixinchains





i think the idea has merit, and should enclude the (furries?) people that liken themselves to creatures. but i'm not in the position to make those calls, and that's probly a good thing
phoenix




Phoenix,
Thanks for responding.
Why don't you start a forum titled 'Furries' on the General bdsm forums?
Do you think the category of Bottom would be helpful for everyone here?
 
Miss Irish

(in reply to phoenixinchains)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:40:38 AM   
phoenixinchains


Posts: 2534
Joined: 4/5/2007
From: i live here
Status: offline



me not furry



(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:43:28 AM   
YesMistressIrish


Posts: 1135
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Calif
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RRafe

I agree. Far too much pressure on this site to "submit" or "Dominate".

When all that a lot of us want-is really just some fun.

Exactly RRafe!
 
Many people could be 'Bottoms' or 'Tops' until they figure out what they really want to be, or stay in one of those two categories if they prefer to do so?
 
Do you think Support here on cm might make the change if enough people write them?
 
Irish

< Message edited by YesMistressIrish -- 10/22/2007 6:44:27 AM >

(in reply to RRafe)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:44:10 AM   
PairOfDimes


Posts: 324
Joined: 7/20/2006
Status: offline
Yes, I think it would be great to divide up the boxes that are checked into both authority (dominant, submissive, switch, neutral) and sensation roles (top, bottom, switch, neutral). Of course, the precise nature of how you approach BDSM belongs in the profile text--that's why we get to write in answers.

(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:45:36 AM   
YesMistressIrish


Posts: 1135
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Calif
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phoenixinchains




me not furry





(in reply to phoenixinchains)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:45:59 AM   
RRafe


Posts: 2060
Joined: 8/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: YesMistressIrish

quote:

ORIGINAL: RRafe

I agree. Far too much pressure on this site to "submit" or "Dominate".

When all that a lot of us want-is really just some fun.

Exactly RRafe!
 
Many people could be 'Bottoms' or 'Tops' until they figure out what they really want to be, or stay in one of those two categories if they prefer to do so?
 
Do you think Support here on cm might make the change if enough people write them?
 
Irish


You should just say so in your profile-I do.

It does keep the castle realm crowd at bay. I think we already have enough catagories-maybe we just need to be more honest?

_____________________________

I seem to be some wierd combination of Ren and Stimpy

(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:46:48 AM   
phoenixinchains


Posts: 2534
Joined: 4/5/2007
From: i live here
Status: offline




all though, i'd love to be a fly on the wall if there were an official CM meeting about this issue...
i dealt with a few unsavory types and used my block feature, but i've not been so discouraged as to lose interest in the site. on the other hand, there's always room for improvement....

phoenix



(in reply to phoenixinchains)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:48:08 AM   
YesMistressIrish


Posts: 1135
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Calif
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: phoenixinchains





and how about some big icon for those who are here to do that cyber-stuff, and an icon for us that aren't in to that. this feature could save me a few head-aches when i go to answer my mail...
phoenix




Phoenix, That's a great idea! A whole category for 'Cyber Only' or 'No Cyber'.  It would be just dandy to keep the cyber wankers on their own site altogether.

Edited because I have been up almost all night brainstorming with Dommes and subs, making plans and having fun.

< Message edited by YesMistressIrish -- 10/22/2007 6:53:20 AM >

(in reply to phoenixinchains)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:55:34 AM   
SunNMoon


Posts: 1058
Joined: 3/18/2007
Status: offline
I love the idea of adding in top and bottom since there are people that just like playing with the stuff. Great idea.

And while adding categories I think there should be trans switch. It bothers me that that’s not an option. I just feel like it’s forcing people who are trans to have to pick, just like top and bottom.

I also believe one should be honest in their profile.  

_____________________________

"We agreed to S&M only, sex and mockery." - Gray’s Anatomy.

(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:57:01 AM   
YesMistressIrish


Posts: 1135
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Calif
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: RRafe

quote:

ORIGINAL: YesMistressIrish

quote:

ORIGINAL: RRafe

I agree. Far too much pressure on this site to "submit" or "Dominate".

When all that a lot of us want-is really just some fun.

Exactly RRafe!
 
Many people could be 'Bottoms' or 'Tops' until they figure out what they really want to be, or stay in one of those two categories if they prefer to do so?
 
Do you think Support here on cm might make the change if enough people write them?
 
Irish


You should just say so in your profile-I do.

It does keep the castle realm crowd at bay. I think we already have enough catagories-maybe we just need to be more honest?

RRafe,
Don't we wish people would just be more honest?

That's why I think 'Bottom' needs it's own category.

When you said 'castle realm', did you mean fantasy life? I don't know much at all about it. Please explain.
 

< Message edited by YesMistressIrish -- 10/22/2007 7:01:31 AM >

(in reply to RRafe)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:58:47 AM   
phoenixinchains


Posts: 2534
Joined: 4/5/2007
From: i live here
Status: offline







and where is says "seeking" something to click that communicates you are a couple looking to bring more people into the relationship and create a polyhouse, not looking to join an existing one...

phoenix

(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 6:59:37 AM   
RRafe


Posts: 2060
Joined: 8/29/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: YesMistressIrish

quote:

ORIGINAL: RRafe

quote:

ORIGINAL: YesMistressIrish

quote:

ORIGINAL: RRafe

I agree. Far too much pressure on this site to "submit" or "Dominate".

When all that a lot of us want-is really just some fun.

Exactly RRafe!
 
Many people could be 'Bottoms' or 'Tops' until they figure out what they really want to be, or stay in one of those two categories if they prefer to do so?
 
Do you think Support here on cm might make the change if enough people write them?
 
Irish


You should just say so in your profile-I do.

It does keep the castle realm crowd at bay. I think we already have enough catagories-maybe we just need to be more honest?

RRafe,
Don't we wish people would just be more honest?
That's why I think 'Bottom' needs it's own category.


Uh huh, but there would still be those twits who think "I am the mighty Dominant-I can mold her into my prefect slave."

Solves very little in the long run. I still have girls who seem to think I could be the big bad master-just because I know how D/s works. Knowing a thing and desiring it-are two entriely different things. Some people refuse to see past thier fantasies.

< Message edited by RRafe -- 10/22/2007 7:03:18 AM >


_____________________________

I seem to be some wierd combination of Ren and Stimpy

(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 7:06:26 AM   
Viridana


Posts: 754
Status: offline
My vote goes for this. As a bottom I can't put myself in any other category than submissive, but I'm not submissive at all.... I'm just a bottom. 

(in reply to RRafe)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 7:26:54 AM   
YesMistressIrish


Posts: 1135
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Calif
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: PairOfDimes

Yes, I think it would be great to divide up the boxes that are checked into both authority (dominant, submissive, switch, neutral) and sensation roles (top, bottom, switch, neutral). Of course, the precise nature of how you approach BDSM belongs in the profile text--that's why we get to write in answers.

Because I am a Domme I am thrilled to have 'Domme' as my category. I change my journal to reflect what's going on every week, so all the bases get covered.
Even when we clearly say things in our profile, it often gets ignored and that's why I think we need a Bottom category.
Irish

(in reply to PairOfDimes)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 7:40:26 AM   
YesMistressIrish


Posts: 1135
Joined: 5/1/2007
From: Calif
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SunNMoon

I love the idea of adding in top and bottom since there are people that just like playing with the stuff. Great idea.

And while adding categories I think there should be trans switch. It bothers me that that’s not an option. I just feel like it’s forcing people who are trans to have to pick, just like top and bottom.

I also believe one should be honest in their profile.  

Trans choices and poly creators like someone else said. Both are important.

(in reply to SunNMoon)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: BOTTOMS - 10/22/2007 7:45:29 AM   
MistressDolly


Posts: 917
Joined: 8/24/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: YesMistressIrish

This is what I wrote to support here on cm:
 
Please add these categories to CM:
 
BOTTOM: As you know, so many, many men say 'submissive' when they mean BOTTOM. So, they lie to get close and hope to be topped. BOTTOM as a category has a huge base here on cm. Certainly much bigger than submissive?
TOPs: For all the bdsm fun. they will look for bottoms and not subs.

Cm is unintentionally forcing men to lie. Let's give all those bottoms and dommes a break and add the category: BOTTOM
Let's save hundreds of hrs and allow people get to rt much faster because the men get to say who and what they really are. For women also, of course, but it's mostly men who have to lie here.

We really need to have these options for profiles and their own forums!
Irish
 
What do you all think of these as an added category and forum titles?
 
Irish


I'm sure they must have contemplated this idea in the past... I wonder why they haven't taken action yet.

It is a fantastic idea.

_____________________________

m i s t r e s s d o l l y . c o m

m y s p a c e


(in reply to YesMistressIrish)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> BOTTOMS Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094