RE: "service" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Mistress



Message


LadyPact -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 9:36:29 AM)

This has become a fantastic thread!
 
Btw, thanks to those who liked My prior comment.
 
I was kind of waiting for your comment on the subject, littlesarbonn, since it's so close to you.  To Me, what you are doing for children now seems just wonderful.  While I wouldn't think it would be the same as the feeling of serving a Domme, it wasn't exactly the angle I was looking at.  It's a much different scenerio, so I would expect it to have a different satisfaction.
 
Also appreciated your thoughts, undergroundsea.  It's a valid point, but I can't say I agree with it.  Afterall, even if My submissive wasn't providing any other type of service, I'd still get to beat him.   [;)]




littlesarbonn -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 10:36:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

This has become a fantastic thread!
 
Btw, thanks to those who liked My prior comment.
 
I was kind of waiting for your comment on the subject, littlesarbonn, since it's so close to you.  To Me, what you are doing for children now seems just wonderful.  While I wouldn't think it would be the same as the feeling of serving a Domme, it wasn't exactly the angle I was looking at.  It's a much different scenerio, so I would expect it to have a different satisfaction.



Well, I've given up on actually serving a woman, so this is about all I have left. It is a satisfaction but of a much, completely different nature.




LadyPact -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 10:40:35 AM)

Never give up, dear.  I would highly doubt you're the quitting type.




YesMistressIrish -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 10:55:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyHibiscus

I think it's pretty telling that the respondents who understand the service issue are FEMALE.   These women are out there doing whatever their tops require of them, and that's pretty much the end of it. I am willing to say that not all of them are wild for every little thing they do, but they sure seem down with the "keeping the dominant happy" portion of the equation.

Regarding LP's post---excellent, btw!---another kicker for males is when the female top says, "Hey, my friend just had surgery, she needs help around her house this week."  or "Go get my kids from karate practice."  WHOA!  Not what they signed up for?  I've seen men who were supposedly owned slaves get into ultracranky mode when faced with the prospect of dealing with those kinds of tasks.  Which leads us back to the question of whether a person is into actually serving, or just doing exactly what they want to get exactly what they want. 

Right on! I am not giving up and I know that there are wonderful men out there.
I give from the beginning in my own way.
I also appreciate the same things Lady P said above, the simple things, good manners, opening the door, being a service oriented person, offering to carry my bags and...

Irish  







thetammyjo -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 11:01:17 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

i think a male who is totally submissive is just the same as a slave or a servant. i truly dont see any difference, and to be honest if the Mistress i was with wanted to say i was one or the other, then so be it.


I use the terms for distinct personality and relationship types because I personally find that too loosely used words result in miscommunication. In my household the terms mean what they do when I use them on this board. That's why I always explain what I mean by then or I try to explain what I mean.




thetammyjo -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 11:05:58 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo
quote:

ORIGINAL: undergroundsea
While I enjoy service and do see D/s value in it, I sometimes see service presented as a payment one must make to have a domme's attention. Over time I have seen different thoughts to drive such an expectation: a mechanism against feeling sexually used, a sub is thought to otherwise not bring enough to a relationship, more.

I still don't see how this is particular to femdom so I'm not truly understanding the complaints.


I made my post more to comment on an observation but you are correct that there is un underlying complaint.

My objection is that some dommes have an air as if the sub must pay for their time either with service or money. The air I sense is not in spirit of D/s but of a different flavor. This attitude suggests that a sub cannot contribute or provide for an interesting relationship or interaction unless he pays in some form, or that the time of the domme is automatically more valuable simply by virtue of the role, with each of which I disagree.

Here is another way to say it:

Person A says to person B that if person B wants the time and attention of person A, person B must do ___ otherwise person A has no interest in person B.

Man says to woman that if woman wants the time and attention of man, woman must give man blowjob otherwise he has no interest in her. Possible BDSM response aside, the woman would be put off because such a statement undermines what she is beyond giving a blowjob. What would you say about the position the man in this example takes?

Domme says to sub that if sub wants the time and attention of domme, sub must do her menials tasks (not for sake of D/s but to pay her for her time) otherwise she has no interest in sub. I think some subs feel similarly put off. What would you say about the position the domme in this example takes?

The questions are rhetorical and asked to invite thought towards a point I try to make--I do not necessarily direct them at you ;-)

Cheers,

Sea



I've known guys, happily not the vast majority of ones I've dated or who were close friends, who frankly believe as you say above. "I take you out to dinner, you put out afterwards" is still a pretty sad way of looking at how dating works. Both genders/sexes can look at that way.

Most of the time that expectation isn't directly verbalized because I guess it's seen as more polite or more romantic to just assume things.

Personally I'd rather have expectations listed up front.




thetammyjo -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 11:08:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

This has become a fantastic thread!

Btw, thanks to those who liked My prior comment.

I was kind of waiting for your comment on the subject, littlesarbonn, since it's so close to you. To Me, what you are doing for children now seems just wonderful. While I wouldn't think it would be the same as the feeling of serving a Domme, it wasn't exactly the angle I was looking at. It's a much different scenerio, so I would expect it to have a different satisfaction.



Well, I've given up on actually serving a woman, so this is about all I have left. It is a satisfaction but of a much, completely different nature.



Didn't you just say with the past week or two that you were back in a Ds or BDSM relationship? Did that crash all ready? That completely sucks if so.




littlesarbonn -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 11:13:16 AM)

Yeah, it crashed.




LadyPact -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 11:56:48 AM)

Sorry to hear that part, littlesarbonn.




HelenaTroy -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 12:03:52 PM)

Oh esteemed Cloudboy, you have trumped me once again with your soaring intellect. Oh let me defer to you from here forward, oh wise internet scholar.


[:'(]

Furthermore, if you have a problem with me or my posts, address me in private. Stop wasting everyone's time disputing a menial quote which was off-topic anyway. I have no desires to get into a flame war. I come here for productive conversation on BDSM, not to have a pissing content on whose google searches yield more relevant information.




thetammyjo -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 2:22:57 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: littlesarbonn

Yeah, it crashed.


Well, drat!

*HUG* if you will accept it.




serviceslaveinMI -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 3:31:18 PM)

As someone who just wants to be used by a great female in order to do any sort of work for her in order to make her life easier, I'm surprised there aren't hardly any women out there looking to use men for manual labor, and nothing else.  You'd think there'd be women everywhere who would like to have a man do their labor.




LadyPact -> RE: "service" (10/25/2007 3:33:03 PM)

I think if you will look at some of the replies, and in some other places, there are several.




Bella1965 -> RE: "service" (10/30/2007 8:35:40 AM)

G'morning all:


(Fast Reply)

Since there were so many individual interpretations of what service means, I figured I'd provide the actual definitions. As per Webster's;

Service - (1) the occupation or function of serving. (2) the work performed by one that serves, contribution to the welfare of others, disposal for use. (3) the act of serving: as a helpful act,  useful labor that does not produce a tangible commodity.

Now, considering that the dominant is in control (which most male "submissives" seem to conveniently forget), they dictate what service means to them and how to apply it. Granted everyone, including "s" types, have desires, wants or needs that they'd like gratified. The problem is that many fail to understand having your fetish fulfilled does not constitute service to most dominants. Relationship or emotional attachments aside, service is simply whatever the dominant decides it is and how they want it done. Period.


Stay safe, play nice, & share your toys w/ others...


[:D]


Bella




undergroundsea -> RE: "service" (10/30/2007 9:05:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Bella1965
Since there were so many individual interpretations of what service means, I figured I'd provide the actual definitions. As per Webster's;

Service - (1) the occupation or function of serving. (2) the work performed by one that serves, contribution to the welfare of others, disposal for use. (3) the act of serving: as a helpful act,  useful labor that does not produce a tangible commodity.


The two definitions I see used most commonly in the context of BDSM is (1)  to be in a submissive relationship (if A is in a submissive relationship with B, A is said to be in service to B), and (2) to provide useful labor.

quote:

Relationship or emotional attachments aside, service is simply whatever the dominant decides it is and how they want it done. Period.


In an ideal purist world, that would be the case. In a world where a submissive does have wants, needs, emotions, other obligations, and potential to be happy and fulfilled versus unhappy and unfulfilled, I think the matter becomes more complex. I think service is between two people and defined by the two people. Sure, the dominant can define and decide what service is. What then remains is a question of compatibility, and if there is a need for compromise by one or both.

I think one can distinguish between service inspired by roles and service inspired by a person. I think the latter offers greater possibilities.

Also, I recall advice from a domme to someone new to service. She said to engage in service only if it enhances the relationship--everyone thinks service is essential to BDSM whereas it is one amongst many activities to be taken or not in BDSM relationships.

Cheers,

Sea




thetammyjo -> RE: "service" (10/30/2007 9:54:37 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: serviceslaveinMI

As someone who just wants to be used by a great female in order to do any sort of work for her in order to make her life easier, I'm surprised there aren't hardly any women out there looking to use men for manual labor, and nothing else. You'd think there'd be women everywhere who would like to have a man do their labor.


I've done that in the past but I found that enough sincere claims of wanting to just provide solid useful labor fell aside when jealousies reared up since I have other partners including a husband.

Sometimes what we think we want and can handle does not fit when the real experiences begin.




aidan -> RE: "service" (10/30/2007 2:08:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo


quote:

ORIGINAL: serviceslaveinMI

As someone who just wants to be used by a great female in order to do any sort of work for her in order to make her life easier, I'm surprised there aren't hardly any women out there looking to use men for manual labor, and nothing else. You'd think there'd be women everywhere who would like to have a man do their labor.


I've done that in the past but I found that enough sincere claims of wanting to just provide solid useful labor fell aside when jealousies reared up since I have other partners including a husband.

Sometimes what we think we want and can handle does not fit when the real experiences begin.


This is an important concept to recognize.

I love to give service, to be useful and helpful and all that jazz. But I recognize that I need more than just an unpaid job from a Domme. I, ya know, need some kind of relationship and personal connection, even if it's just friendship and casual play. Just last week, while I was in New York City doing college stuff, I visited a Domme friend. I cleaned Her apartment, went grocery shopping, helped take care of the dogs...Just generally gave Her a day off. I did that because She's somebody I like and care about, and I knew it would be nice of me to do. Her and I play, but I didn't do those things in exchange for play.

I don't knoe quite where I was going with this, and it's dinner time now. Hopefully some food in my belly will help clear my thoughts. I think what I'm trying to get at is that you need to recognize what your needs are in a relationship, and you shouldn't feel like those needs are unimportant just because you're a sub. A submissive/bottom/slave is entitled to their needs just as much as a Dominant/Top/Mistress.




MystressDream -> RE: "service" (10/30/2007 3:50:55 PM)

cloudboy.... I will add my two cents to your confusion about service and BDSM.  I think what might clarify it for you is this:

M/s or D/s is who and what we are.  BDSM is just activities some of us enjoy.

Service, IMO, is part of the M/s or D/s dynamic in a relationship.  BDSM is just activities that may come into play, but, may not, depending on the relationship.

I add my voice to those Mistress's who are sick of the "I am a sexslave only.  I am an expert at giving oral satisfaction".  Sorry.... but few "sex slaves" can accomplish much more than what we already have available in a nightstand.  It is the relationship that is important to most of us, not the orgasm.




thetammyjo -> RE: "service" (10/31/2007 6:03:21 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: aidan

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo


quote:

ORIGINAL: serviceslaveinMI

As someone who just wants to be used by a great female in order to do any sort of work for her in order to make her life easier, I'm surprised there aren't hardly any women out there looking to use men for manual labor, and nothing else. You'd think there'd be women everywhere who would like to have a man do their labor.


I've done that in the past but I found that enough sincere claims of wanting to just provide solid useful labor fell aside when jealousies reared up since I have other partners including a husband.

Sometimes what we think we want and can handle does not fit when the real experiences begin.


This is an important concept to recognize.

I love to give service, to be useful and helpful and all that jazz. But I recognize that I need more than just an unpaid job from a Domme. I, ya know, need some kind of relationship and personal connection, even if it's just friendship and casual play. Just last week, while I was in New York City doing college stuff, I visited a Domme friend. I cleaned Her apartment, went grocery shopping, helped take care of the dogs...Just generally gave Her a day off. I did that because She's somebody I like and care about, and I knew it would be nice of me to do. Her and I play, but I didn't do those things in exchange for play.

I don't knoe quite where I was going with this, and it's dinner time now. Hopefully some food in my belly will help clear my thoughts. I think what I'm trying to get at is that you need to recognize what your needs are in a relationship, and you shouldn't feel like those needs are unimportant just because you're a sub. A submissive/bottom/slave is entitled to their needs just as much as a Dominant/Top/Mistress.



This is where both people must be responsible for negotiating honestly and for communicating once the dynamic starts.

Let me give you a mundane comparison on service for kink and service for other emotional reasons.

Fox went to his parents house over the weekend and got back last night.

He did "slave labor" for them around the house and yard and he came back damned sore physically. He did it cause it was his duty as a good son but he came back emotionally drained as well. They do not accept his bisexuality, they do not accept his kink, they constantly nag about about things.

Now he could do the exact same labor for me but I accept his bisexuality, his kink, his everything, and I give him clear directions and feedback, I praise him not nag him. I take his service not as he duty but as his enactment of how much he believes I deserve it.

Our dynamic could be similar to a good loving vanilla dynamic too only ours is Ds based.

The point is that the relationship determines the value and consequences of the activity, not the activity itself.

Your friend in NYC was a lucky lady.




undergroundsea -> RE: "service" (10/31/2007 6:25:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thetammyjo
He did "slave labor" for them around the house and yard and he came back damned sore physically. He did it cause it was his duty as a good son but he came back emotionally drained as well.


Service can be an activity that requires energy or one that provides energy or satisfaction depending on how it is managed. Service out of a sense of duty (one doesn't necessarily want to do it but does it because considers it a duty) drains energy. While it is ok to have aspects of D/s that drain energy, there must be adequate energy return or the overall relationship satisfaction will diminish. Also, if service can instead be made into something that provides energy, all the better.

Cheers,

Sea




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875