chellekitty
Posts: 3923
Joined: 3/27/2005 Status: offline
|
ok....Fast Replying to several posts....here i go.... quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercurialdame I think that subs control everything that he wishes them to have control of at the time. If he wants control, he'll take it. Other than that, he enjoys our play for title games. That i always seem to lose. ? go figure? Its all a game. Its for fun. <snip> There maybe only one Dominant in your relationship, but there are two people. Of equal import. my problem with your post may be your nouns and pronouns...perhaps in your relationship its a play for title games, but in my life, if "submissive" or "slave" and "Dominant" or "Master/Owner" are just titles we play games with thats just for fun...it's not a relationship...it just is, and there happens to be words already established that go along with what is.... and absolutely....in a relationship between a Dominant and a submissive, they are equally important...they are different roles, but equally important....imagine how little the pyramids would be, if they would be at all if the slaves had not existed....but the slaves would have not built them had they not been driven by their Masters...not the same as a lifestyle Master and slave, i know...but it wasn't all for naught... quote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord Every time the Dom gives the sub the ability to make a choice which affects them both, he gives her a bit more control. Realistically, it's entirely unavoidable for a sub to give up all control and decision-making, even in TPE M/s. <snip> There's one mitigating argument I can see. A sub who earnestly stops and considers at every decision, "How would he want this done?", working to the best of her ability to interept his will as opposed to her own, could p.. is that so hard to conceptualize? i am talking to a Dominant that i match up with very well and even without an defined, established relationship...i am already thinking i that thought pattern...not because he ordered me to...though he did bring it up...put a mirror in front of my face and said that every thing you do reflects me...and it does....even without that defined, established relationship...and he did not order me to, because he did not need to...once he brought it up, it was an "oh shit" moment...and i began correcting it imediately.... quote:
ORIGINAL: Squeakers My personal feeling is, in order to control another person or to give control to another person you must have mastered control over yourself. <snip> Knowing that I have control over my own actions, lessens my fear of turning control over to him. There was a time in my life when I did not have control over my own actions, and I sincerely found myself trying to control him simply out of fear that if he asked me to do something that I was sincerely afraid to do or went against my better judgement, I'd be forced to do so simply because I lacked the control to say, "Umm no I am not doing that." I think for me, the fact that I lacked control over me, really caused so much fear that I simply could not hand over control to anyone else, and because deep down I needed control over something, I'd try to control him or the situation. Once I mastered control over myself, I learned, what I could control and what I could not. I could not control what he was going to ask of me, the only thing I could control was my reaction to the command. I think in going along with that is trust, trust in his command and trust in my reaction. Time, communication and openness with each other, predicts his command and my reaction. <snip> Quoted for Truth quote:
ORIGINAL: julietsierra My Master once said "He asked if she'd give her right arm for him. She said she would. It was all fun and games after that - until he asked for her right arm." people think it's silly for me to have dismemberment on my list of hard limits, thats common sense, right? i now have validation from something besides movies.... quote:
ORIGINAL: tricia I know, at times, the overwhelming theme on the message boards is how strong willed, independent, aggressive women are outside of their relationships. They view themselves as equals to their dominants, masters, owners. I’m not saying there is anything wrong with this – but could it be possible that these personality traits or this frame of mind does spill over into their relationships and ultimately lead to the s type having more control than one would expect in this type of relationship. i am strong willed, independent and [somewhat] agressive in my relationships...and Daddy likes that...for us, not for anyone else, but for us, the power exchange is all that more....powerful....when there is that much more power to exchange....not sure how else to put it...its like being able to stay on and ride that wild stallion... also, i mentioned it earlier....i am equal to everyone...on a human level...no better, no worse....i serve a different purpose, yes, but i am equal....and there is no "spill over" because there is no seperation.... in writing these responses i have come to my own personal conclusion at this point....and i agree with someone else, i am just not sure who that is, it was someone earlier in this thread....when there is something as drastic as a submissive controlling a Dominant, i believe it comes down to a lack of compatibility....and whats good for you, may not be good for me, and whats good for me, may not be good for you...or it may...but there is someone out there for everyone...just have to find them....or multiple someone's...that takes a little longer though...more puzzle pieces to fit together... chelle...the thoughtful one, this morning
_____________________________
One thing I know: the only ones among you who will be really happy are those who will have sought and found how to serve. ~Albert Schweitzer
|