MadameMarque
Posts: 1128
Joined: 3/19/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: PeonForHer quote:
ORIGINAL: MadameMarque Well, you've already heard it: Different women like different things. When in doubt, ask. So, I'll just say for my part, that by the time a guy is taking off his clothes in front of me, I think it'd be kinda hot, if he didn't have any underwear on. (Assuming it didn't ruin the line of his pants when they were on, and that he wasn't all linty, hahaha.) MM, if a dominant were to tell me whether or not to put on underwear before meeting her I'd be happy to go along with it. But there's no way I'm going to ask her first. *Wince*! Not unless we knew each other pretty damned well anyway, that is. ... As the OP is inquiring about this very matter: if one were in doubt about whether the lady had a preference as to his dress, he might ask, “Do you have a preference as to how I’m dressed?” If he expects to be taking his clothes off, then I’m supposing she’s expecting it, too, so then is the moment for her to issue any preferences as to what’s under his clothes. He doesn’t have to say anything that would cause wincing, such as, “And shall I wear underwear?,” if the prospect of her even seeing his underwear hasn’t remotely been suggested. I think the advice, “When in doubt, ask,” leaves room for discretion. What’s more likely, seems to me, is that the subject wouldn’t come up, because a. they hadn’t acknowledged that he might be shedding his clothes, at this early stage, so it wouldn’t have been a topic beforehand, b. it didn’t occur to her that he wouldn’t have on underwear, c. among his many considerations in seeing her, asking whether he should wear underwear wouldn’t make the top two dozen, d. (my personal favourite for what actually did happen) if it hadn’t been the underwear, it would have been something else. The dominant would have used anything about his dress, grooming, or comportment as a handle for exhibiting her dominance, making it the excuse for discipline and establishing a dominant/submissive status.
< Message edited by MadameMarque -- 6/14/2009 5:21:22 AM >
|