LadyHugs -> RE: Sissies' Acceptance Problem (12/9/2007 9:29:16 AM)
|
Dear iwearpanties, diaperdbaby, Ladies and Gentlemen; Hopefully others will respond to my questions, [Reference Post #76] but, I do wish to thank you for responding and offers more questions to be asked, to add to the understanding, knowledge and exchange of thoughts and or reasonings. Iwearpanties, you mentioned in the response to Post #76, that women wouldn't be seen in a judgmental way if they wore male attire and had male props as to be and or appear more masculine. I wish to say, from my own experiences--I have been subjected to many people's perception and or assumptions when wearning a masculine attire. It is unfortunate, that most of the time wearing a uniform--which is military and or uniformed by its nature -- I have often been labeled as a Lesbian and or Butch; when in fact I am and will remain a Heterosexual. I do have Butch and Lesbian friends and acquaintances. However, I wanted to offer the experiences I've had working in a male dominated profession in and or out of uniform; often puts people in a difficult position--especially when there are brief encounters and not knowing the person fully. Having many Gay friends--I am often judged as a Lesbian as well. So many who find out I am a Gay man trapped in a lady's body--blush from embarrassment that they 'assumed' rather than made an inquiry to know factually. In addition, drag-queens do wear feminine attire and often so well -- you really can't tell. Diaperedbaby, thank you for responding also to Post #76 So, this adds to another question to explore for those who identify with this thread-- 1. Do you think about being mistaken for a Gay man who is a drag queen or one who is evolving into one by wearing feminine undergarments? 2. Could this be a avenue to be bisexual 'safely' through dressing femmie? 3. If it is all about the 'feel' of under garments, why not have male under garments 'tailored' as to give that 'firm/tighter' feel? 4. Why is there a thought that women seek a male wife? Might be many women who dislike the thought of marriage yet, prefer a Master/Mistress-slave relationship-- 5. Enhancement is often associated with improvement, development and or amplification. IF there is a Dominant-submissive relationship, why does it require 'dressing' femme to enhance performance when relationships are often based on consistancy as well as expectations of performance in the partnership? Having to enhance yourself in order to bring you up to the desires and expectations of the lady/woman as Dominant; wouldn't this be seen the same as 'conditional?' Wouldn't this be much like a case of being a skinny person, then don a fat suit so there can be an enhanced experience of being fat, yet--you are able to take it off as and when you please, as to be skinny again--as not to maintain the state of being fat--isn't this a 'conditional' experience as well? [Borrowed example from a very inquisitive lady who wrote me one time] Having to lean on enhancements as to perform in a consistant manner and what is expected over all; is an addiction perhaps? 6. Without the 'sex' and or 'sexual intercourse' factors --just focus on the acts, behavior, belief system, spiritual, mental, emotional self -- would it be possible to be submissive without fetish, without props and self placement in sensations and visible stimulation, e.g. clothes, frocks, props, etc.? 7. What do men who do femme want out of Female Dominants? What are they expected to do as to be an ideal partner for someone who likes to dress femme? 8. This is a repeat question, still unanswered but--still is an interest to me and perhaps others reading this thread -- What do you (gentlemen who identify as sissy, diapered boys, cross-dressers, femme fetish, etc) see as humiliation role play and or mind/emotional/spiritual placement for humble and or status reassignment into something under the Female Dominant; and what do you gentlemen see as being an insult and or mocking women? Where are your lines between those two sides? 9. What power do clothes have over you that nothing else can replace it; to give the 'enhanced' experience of submission and or fetish and or humiliation? Again, I will state--this is not to flame or disrespect however, these questions and responses may/can/will help understand beyond the props and or labels. Hope more folks will participate in the discussion of an exploring nature. [Smiles] Just some thoughts. Respectfully submitted for consideration, Lady Hugs
|
|
|
|