Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: A very controversial subject


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: A very controversial subject Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/12/2007 12:39:32 PM   
GoddessDustyGold


Posts: 2822
Joined: 4/11/2004
From: Arizona
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

What is really quite funny is that alot of my own spiritual views run parallel to christianity. So the reality is that I am not a fanatical ANTI-christian. I am anti religious.

<snipped>
My point about loosening up relates to this. IF indeed, a person's faith is so personal and so fragile that it cannot withstand a debate where opposing points of view are brought to the table without it being considered an attack, then why put it into a public venue?

I will cheerfully debate this issue with anyone. Sure, it may get passionate. Why can't it? Just because it is ohhhh "religioun" and somehow should be protected from negative words, passionate debate?



Negative words:  "I don't believe because...  vs.
Negative words:  "You are a stupid delusional moron if you believe this pile of shit.  Get a life and get a brain" 
 
Which one is acceptable?  Which one could be the beginning of a passionate debate and the other a dismissive personal attack?   I am fine with the first.  I am not so fine with the second.
But I see a lot of posters who are perfectly fine with the second. 
***************************************************************
Christian Debater:  I believe in God and Jesus Christ."  (Post #5)
Non-Christian Debater:   "Don't push your beliefs on me."  (Post #7)
 
I think this is exactly our point, LaT.  Debating is fine.  It is not fine when the anti-Christian side deteriorates into "fucking delusional morons" that I take issue. 
My son-in-law is a non-believer.  We debate on occasion.  I do not tell him he is going to hell in a handbasket if he doesn't come over the My side.  He does not tell Me I am a fool to believe in a fairytale  
Please re-read Post #5 and  Post #7.   What in the world was stated in post # 5 that caused post #7 to read & respond to this as a "pushing their beliefs" on someone else?  If a Christian even states on these boards that they are a Christian, they are immediatley accused of proselityzing. 
(...I might not have spelled that last big word correctly!)
These two example posts did not deteriorate into name calling.  But they are a good example of the hyper-sensitivity on the other side, wouldn't you say?


_____________________________

Dusty
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety
B Franklin
Don't blame Me ~ I didn't vote for either of them
The Hidden Kingdom


(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/12/2007 12:48:31 PM   
sharainks


Posts: 499
Joined: 12/13/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sharainks

I've noticed the anti Christian bent on here many times.  If some of the same type of things were said about Wiccans IE: "So how old were you when you first flew on a broom?" the writer of that would be flamed without ceasing. 




An excellent example of what I have never seen.
Message edited by GoddessDustyGold


Exactly and I doubt you ever will.  For the life of me I don't understand what people get from all the name calling and religion bashing that goes on.   Yet it appears to be ok to be Wiccan, Druid, Pagan, Asatru, Buddist, Hindu or whatver else just don't be a Christian. 

I get as tired as anyone else of people showing up on my doorstep trying to tell me that their particular brand of faith is the only one that saves your soul.  I tell them I attend a church of my own choosing and am content there.  I get tired of the Fred Phelps-ian hate spewing.  I sometimes wonder if people understand that really isn't how Christians are supposed to act.

< Message edited by sharainks -- 11/12/2007 12:56:20 PM >

(in reply to GoddessDustyGold)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/12/2007 1:52:36 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
GDG, I agree with all of the points you have made.

It really all comes down to debating style and also the personal sensitivity of those debating. This reminds me of another thread I contributed somewhere on here today.

Sometimes we all, when it is a sensitive subject, are just primed and looking for ammunition to be able to say " Ah ha!!! See you are attacking me and now I am going to get upset and get my undies bunched". The problem is that, it MAY have not been intended that way at all and that we are getting those panties bunched for no good reason. It simply happened because it was sensitive to us, so we read into it what we perceived that person to mean and reacted.

For myself, if there is an issue that is personal and sensitive and I know I cannot take whatever words other posters are going to come up with to add to the melee' I will not even bring it into this arena. If I see a thread that is a sensitive issue for me, I will not participate. Because I know myself and I know that I will be looking for any little thing that I can possibly twist around and get my own panties bunched over. It is just not worth it, not for me and certainly not for the innocent party that was just giving their point of view.

We have no way of always knowing the nature of intent, of each and every poster on these forums. Further more, we have no way of knowing the mental state of each poster to know what drives their intent. Those two facts along make it rediculous to allow them to upset us. To do so gives a potential mental case power over us. I quite simply will not allow it. Regardless of subject matter.

So yes, in a happy happy joy joy world, we would all have these discussions using all the most politically correct words and do our level best to avoid insulting or upsetting one another. But it's just not going to happen. Too many variables at play.




_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to GoddessDustyGold)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/12/2007 2:14:37 PM   
GoddessDustyGold


Posts: 2822
Joined: 4/11/2004
From: Arizona
Status: offline
Oh My!  I have never been Politically Correct!  I have to consider that a personal insult!  
How boring, tho, would it be, if the only people who ever wrote anything was in agreement to the original post.
 
"Yeah, baby...that is horrible and I agree!"
Hey Man, you are so right!  I would never vote for that asswipe!"
 
*Yawn*
 
I am simply one who does not need to see, hear or read personal insults about any of it.  We should be better than that, and when we are not, it always makes Me think about a schoolyard fight. 
 
"I did not say that!"
"Well, you're a stupid jerk and your mother is a ho"
 
It honestly sounds like that, at times, to Me.
 
When someone has to resort to that to make a point, they haven't made a point at all, IMO!
That said, I see/read/hear it all the time, and I have a pretty thick skin.  Sometimes, it is even pretty amusing, as long as I am not the one being strung up and hung out to dry! 

_____________________________

Dusty
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety
B Franklin
Don't blame Me ~ I didn't vote for either of them
The Hidden Kingdom


(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/12/2007 2:16:52 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
This debate just isn't going to be any fun because we agree too much!

_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to GoddessDustyGold)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/12/2007 2:17:37 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

I would be grateful if you could show me where I accused you of calling me anti- christian.


Post 44:

quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

Stating that I do not believe in god or whatever you want to call it is not Christian bashing.


Post 50:


quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

If you see that as Christian bashing so be it
.


Firm

edited to add second example.


< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 11/12/2007 2:23:05 PM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to susie)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/12/2007 2:40:05 PM   
susie


Posts: 1699
Joined: 11/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

I would be grateful if you could show me where I accused you of calling me anti- christian.


Post 44:

quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

Stating that I do not believe in god or whatever you want to call it is not Christian bashing.


Post 50:


quote:

ORIGINAL: susie

If you see that as Christian bashing so be it
.


Firm

edited to add second example.



Read what you want into things. I am done with the childishness of posts such as this. 

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/14/2007 4:04:49 PM   
slaveluci


Posts: 4294
Joined: 3/2/2007
From: Little Rock, AR
Status: offline
Hello LaT,
Took me a couple days to get back to this thread as I had to drive from AR back to WV for a couple days and haven't been on much at all.  I enjoyed your post and wanted to respond back even though it is a bit later.  So here goes:

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse
IF indeed, a person's faith is so personal and so fragile that it cannot withstand a debate where opposing points of view are brought to the table without it being considered an attack, then why put it into a public venue?

I will cheerfully debate this issue with anyone. Sure, it may get passionate. Why can't it? Just because it is ohhhh "religioun" and somehow should be protected from negative words, passionate debate?

I think you make a valid point here though I pretty much feel differently.  I happen to believe that a person's personal religious/spiritual beliefs are valid simply because they hold them.  One's sacred beliefs should be respected until such point as they try to force them onto me.  By force, I don't mean sharing them or discussing them.  Forcing them on me means they discount my own beliefs and try to make me replace mine with theirs. Anything short of that doesn't offend me in the least no matter how I view their beliefs. 

As far as a debate being seen as an attack, I don't feel it should be.  I have never been the one to initiate discussion of my spiritual beliefs in a public venue.  My discussion of such has always been in response to someone attacking them FIRST.  To come to a public venue (especially one of a sexual nature such as CM) and start "preaching" is ludicrous indeed, in my opinion.  But, to be minding my own business here and see (yet again) another tiresome attack thread on Christians - yup, I chime in in "defense."  I don't see that as making my beliefs "fragile" or making me unable to have an intelligent debate about them.  That's very, very rarely ever the attacker's intent.  It's usually to dismiss and mock.  My beliefs are exactly the opposite of fragile.  That's why I then feel the desire to speak up in my beliefs' defense.
quote:

It is okay to debate which whip material is better, bullhide or kangaroo, but to bring the same type of discussion style to the subject of religioun is instantly a terrible thing? I can passionately say why I dislike bullhide but I cannot passionately say why I dislike modern day christianity? I can say I prefer kangaroo to your bullhide, and why but I cannot give the same opinions on religioun?

While your point is well taken, to me it's not comparing anything even remotely comparable.  A person's deeply held, sacred world views/beliefs mean quite a bit more than the material a whip is made of.  I don't like it when people badmouth my favorite books, music, movies, or whips.  Their words don't cut as deeply, however, as they would if they were to badmouth my mother, my physical appearance or my God.  There's a huge difference there to me at least.  Some things you don't want to hear.  Some are just hurtful and unnecessary.  Tearing down someone else's beliefs simply because I don't share them is, to me, one of those unnecessary things.  It works both ways, in my opinion.  You seem to be saying that people are often just too sensitive over their religious/spiritual beliefs and they shouldn't be so fragile when attacked about them.  They shouldn't let their very "core" be threatened over a dissenting opinion.  Well, I see your point.  But, for some of us, those beliefs ARE our core.  I can see the opposing view and say why does someone who feels derision for my beliefs feel so empty at their own core that they have to shred what I hold sacred?  It goes both ways. 
quote:

The thing is this, I don't feel personally attacked regardless of subject. Most people that covet a bullhide whip are not going to feel personally attacked if I say, "wow, I tried that once and thought it was shit" BUT, if you use the very same style of debate on religioun you are soooooooo guaranteed to get undies bunched and someone will inevitably take a condesending tone and go all "one true wayish" trying to play the "I know my way is better than yours so somehow, I am better than you" attitude
Again, dissing my favorite toy doesn't begin to compare to mocking my deity.  Way different for me.  And I know that I personally have never been guilty of being "one true wayish" or "superior" in my words about my spiritual beliefs.  I honor everyone's beliefs no matter how little I share them.  I don't recall seeing much behavior of that ilk around here from those identifying as Christians.  I don't recall reading them saying (very often if at all) that anyone who didn't share their beliefs was destined to burn for eternity though I have seen much being said negatively toward them for what they believe.
quote:

Do I personally think that alot of people following alot of faiths have blinders on? Why yes I do! Do I think they are terrible people or idiots for it, no. Mislead perhaps. Those are my beliefs. I honestly don't care if anyone else agrees with me. It is my own personal thing

Just as it could be my belief that those who don't believe as I do are seriously mislead as you say.  Doesn't matter.  To each her own.
quote:

All of that being said, it really doesn't matter does it? I will go on about my way and everyone else is going to go on about theirs. I just simply, find it rather interesting, that religioun is one of the few subjects that cannot be discussed and debated without people taking it all personal and getting upset, feeling attacked

And again, I will say it should be very obvious why that is.  We're not discussing our favorite meal, book, album, place to vacation, etc.  When we attempt to discussion religion, for those who hold such beliefs, it is much more serious than discussing trivial subjects such as that.  Of course people are going to be sensitive.  If, for instance, you had had an abortion and then the subject comes up on these forums, it's probably going to strike a nerve if someone says anyone who has had an abortion is a murderer, don't you think?  Why would that cause someone to feel attacked?  I think it's obvious why.
quote:

If you honestly believe down to your core, that what you believe in, is correct. That it really is the One True Way, it shouldn't matter what anyone else thinks

Indeed.  And, to me, it doesn't.
quote:

 There is no reason to be upset

See above.  There is reason to be upset.  Not that it's going to make me change my deeply held beliefs.  But seeing them ridiculed IS reason to feel upset.
quote:

 Because you know you are on the right path, regardless of what anyone else believes about you or your faith.......no?

Indeed!
Some good points and tactfully made, LaT.  Thanks for the discourse..............luci

_____________________________

To choose a good book, look in an inquisitor’s prohibited list. ~John Aikin

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/14/2007 6:22:45 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Actually Carl Jung, and many that continue his work would disagree. Regardless if that mystical being exists or not, the power one gains from the manifestation of an archetype, can be a great psychological boost. The unfortunate part is that many in the West mean the abrahamic religions, when they use the word religion, which is pretty narrow minded, considering the vast number of non-abrahamic religions out there. If one were to study the reasons for mythology, from a sociological and psychological perspective, you would see that mankind has been dividing a higher power into many different aspects, or archetypes. Each of these aspects is defined with certain virtues, and one must follow certain morals or ethics, to attain those virtues.

This also does not even touch on the teaching of virtues through stories that utilize metaphore and parabel. It is those that wish to take the spiritual writings of the religions as literal, but that would be the opposite of how stories were done in the era many of these writings occur. I have adapted many religious stories, to use different names and details, only to have non-religious people tell me it is a very inspirational or motivating story.

One last thing, crutches are not always bad. It is when the crutch is used, without a positive result from it's use. If you disagree with this, be sure and not use crutches if you ever break your leg.

Orion


quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

All religion is fantasy, a psychological crutch, a security blanket that shuts out the stark reality of existance.


_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/14/2007 6:25:07 PM   
OrionTheWolf


Posts: 7803
Joined: 10/11/2006
Status: offline
Try this and see if it fits with your criteria. I am not a deout Taoist, but then again I am not a devout any religion or belief.

http://www.taoteching.org/

Orion


quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

What? Religion is fake? There are no Gods or Goddesses hanging up in the sky, just waiting for us to make a mistake so we can be smited?

Well, I'm going to temper that a bit:
I'm an astronomer. I look out, away from the Earth, and I see the universe. A universe not only stranger than I or anyone imagines, but stranger than anyone CAN imagine. Where did it all come from? Was it a creation by some being(s), or an accident of nature? (Pretty awesome thought, either way.) Where do we fit into the picture? Are we alone?

The problem I have with all of man's religions so far is: their conception of God is too small, too petty, too much of a mirror of man's worst qualities, for me to take them seriously.

A few of them have some good sociological ideas: don't go around killing people, try to be fair and honest with others, help out wherever you can... the rest of it is usually just crap.


_____________________________

When speaking of slaves people always tend to ignore this definition "One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence."

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/17/2007 1:30:06 PM   
SrMichael


Posts: 10
Joined: 11/11/2007
Status: offline
Ok, while I do believe that this site, like all other D/s sites out there have a high percentage of wannabe's (both top and bottom), I hardly think that was a fair characturization. The simple fact is, most of us here are real, some with more experience that others, but the egotism (or is arogance more the right word?) involved in this names summery actualy belittes all of us Doms here.
SrMichael

(in reply to TheKingofKings)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/17/2007 1:37:37 PM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

The problem, as I see it anyway, with religious fantatics........is that they are so........fantatical about it!

I honestly don't care what a person believes. They can worship a man living on the moon because it is made of green cheese, for all I care. It is when they try to convince me that I need to believe the same, that they are somehow better, that I am somehow evil, for not believing the same. THAT is when I have a problem.

A religious person will feel it is their constitutional right to spout whatever their beliefs are, whereever and whenever they choose. BUT if you spout off anything that contradicts their belief with even half the conviction and passion, they you are evil and attacking them.

I suppose it is because it threatens the very core of who they are, because it challenges something that cannot be proven. Yet it is something that is so important to them on such a personal level.

All in all, people really need to loosen up.


Yes. We've all had that sort of experience... either with religions, politics, or folks who follow "philosophies" based on some fantasy world.

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: A very controversial subject - 11/17/2007 1:48:36 PM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: OrionTheWolf

Try this and see if it fits with your criteria. I am not a deout Taoist, but then again I am not a devout any religion or belief.

http://www.taoteching.org/


Orion,
Thanks so much for the link! But it's not really needed. I've been reading and trying to apply Taoisim to my everyday life since about 1982, when a friend of mine gave me a copy of Ben Huff's "The Tao of Pooh" as a high school graduation present. Oddly, that was also the year I began to define my Pu, and realized I was both bi, and a submissive/switch. Yes, the Tao tends to fill in a lot of holes, and gives me a path from where I am now, to where I want to be... but, Taoisim is more of a philosophy of life, rather than religion. It has no diety (unless you count the Tao itself) no hard and fast tennants. Just the suggestion of "going with the flow." LOL

Religion for me is still a "wait and see" proposition. Every so often, I come across little details in the universe that makes me think that, if "God" wanted us all to take things on faith, he should have covered his tracks better.

Just sayin'....

Orion


quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

What? Religion is fake? There are no Gods or Goddesses hanging up in the sky, just waiting for us to make a mistake so we can be smited?

Well, I'm going to temper that a bit:
I'm an astronomer. I look out, away from the Earth, and I see the universe. A universe not only stranger than I or anyone imagines, but stranger than anyone CAN imagine. Where did it all come from? Was it a creation by some being(s), or an accident of nature? (Pretty awesome thought, either way.) Where do we fit into the picture? Are we alone?

The problem I have with all of man's religions so far is: their conception of God is too small, too petty, too much of a mirror of man's worst qualities, for me to take them seriously.

A few of them have some good sociological ideas: don't go around killing people, try to be fair and honest with others, help out wherever you can... the rest of it is usually just crap.


(in reply to OrionTheWolf)
Profile   Post #: 73
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: A very controversial subject Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109