RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant

RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid

Message

sexypet -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/16/2007 9:04:37 AM)
One cannot even buy a 15" flat panel in store at Staples anymore, only 17 and 19". While i am only on a 15" flat panel, consideration needs to be given to those with the latest technology.

farglebargle -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/16/2007 9:10:53 AM)
Consideration needs to be given to ALL users. The recipe for technology happiness is "Be very specific about what you provide, and very liberal about what you'll accept". Of course, programmers and graphic designers are limited by the chosen tools and experiences. It's not TOO bad. I expect however at even greater font sizes, it will degrade horribly, and that becomes an accessibility issue for the visually impaired, who aren't using a screen-reader. ( Compatibility with assistive technology is a whole OTHER barrel of eels! )

Celeste43 -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/16/2007 12:51:23 PM)
Another vote for enlarging the font.

RosaB -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/16/2007 5:01:13 PM)
I'm just happy to know my pc nor my eyes are to blame for the rather strange new look this time around. Guess I'll adjust at some point. ssheshhhh, now I'll have to spring for those glasses after all. Rosa

SugarMyChurro -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/16/2007 5:13:44 PM)
"View Forum Posts" still looks wonky. Is anyone else surprised that there isn't a development versus production version of all of this? I mean, they are making changes "live." No wonder why the browse photo and next photo in a profile features are still broken for non-IE browsers.

sexypet -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/16/2007 9:05:19 PM)
Oh the next photo doesn't work too well in general. And since this format change my mail takes FOREVER to open. i click..........and nothing. The last thing they needed to do was new skins. It's so ugly i've stopped hanging out here as much as usual.

MissSCD -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/16/2007 9:07:43 PM)
It sucks. MissSCD

Domin8tingUrDrmz -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 3:23:50 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: kc692 We have all see changes here before, they don't always stick depending on the public acceptance or non acceptance. Maybe they will change it back, who knows? quote: ORIGINAL: Domin8tingUrDrmz And if they do change it back, because of enough people griping over it, I will be one of the first starting a new thread jumping up and down in glee! That's all this thread is for. A small hope that CM takes our opinions into consideration. Okay. They haven't changed it back, but they have tweaked it a bit and it is starting to flow a bit better now. I still think the color scheme is ugly...lol. But, the visibility has improved. So while it's still not to my liking (nor worthy of a new thread) it is better than it was when I started this thread.

camille65 -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 4:32:57 AM)
I squint reading the buttons on the home page but otherwise I like the look of it. That said, I squint in the forums as well lol. I have a tough time reading the light colored fonts and the italic posts, some I have such a problem that I no longer try and force my way through the post. [8\|] Hey I say kudos[:)] to CM for putting in the effort to make changes, but like several have said I too wish there was a forum for us to put suggestions or problems with responses by the Mods.

camille65 -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 5:06:11 AM)
Okay this is bugging the crap out of me!! When I peruse profiles on the home page I can only get 3 before they rotate again. Does this happen to anyone else? I have my settings totally open but when I click next profile I can only go to 3 before getting the first then second then third again! Arghhhhhhhh I wanna perv profiles [&:]

SugarMyChurro -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 6:27:14 AM)
I think it looks fine. I think they made the light grey more blue (slightly). They obviously fixed the font/CSS issues. If anything, it looks more like the message boards now. Which is perfect in my view - the whole site is now more coherent design-wise, one side compared to the other. Maybe drop the brown bars on the message board next.

Raechard -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 8:29:33 AM)
Looks ok to me. Now can we have that bright green and yellow background everyone has been craving for? You say you don't want bright green and yellow but you all know deep down it is one of your most dark untold fantasies to experience that which is the bright green and yellow background![8\|]

farglebargle -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 9:02:43 AM)
View -> Page Style -> No Style. Black text, blue links on white background.

Raechard -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 9:04:37 AM)
It works and now I know what being an accountant is like!

SugarMyChurro -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 5:41:59 PM)
"Save checked" in the mail section is still on two lines.

CuriousLord -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 6:49:51 PM)
I rather like the new page.

kc692 -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 7:13:41 PM)
I do too!!! (Whoops, I already voted, lol) I like it even better with the tweaks they have done!

stef -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 10:02:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SugarMyChurro "Save checked" in the mail section is still on two lines. Not for me. What browser/version are you using? ~stef

winterlight -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 10:06:42 PM)
well some of us are baby boomers. I have glasses now...CM could u please make the print bigger?

kc692 -> RE: CM Page Format - Question and Rant (11/17/2007 10:07:37 PM)
There was a bug with ie7 that mail could not be saved to an outside address, but that has been fixed.

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625