laurell3
Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bobbie9395 Good afternoon. I have been communicating with a DOM with whom I have begun an online D/s relationship. My responses to the tasks he assigns me, my ability to obey, and my attitude will determine if we will actually meet. He is totally aware that one of my hard limits is that I do not share in any shape or form. I do not share myself and I will not share him. Please let me say, I DO know that humiliation is part of the lifestyle and I have no problem with that, as long as my hard limits and his hard limits are respected. He called me Friday evening and proceeded to relate to me every detail of an encounter he had with someone a couple of days earlier. He had contacted her online last weekend. At this point, since we have NOT met, but considering the fact that he has stated we have begun an online D/s relationship, are we expected to respect each other's hard limits? He's angry with me because I became a bit upset about his encounter. All I'm asking is shouldn't the respect go both ways? If we ARE in this online relationlship, I need to respond to him as if I were his sub. Isn't the reverse true? He needs to respect my hard limits, which we had previously discussed. I hope I've explained this in an understandable way. Your responses will determine what kind, if any, apology he gets from me. If I'm wrong, I have absolutely no problem with apologizing. I am totaly new to this lifestyle and want to do the right thing. Is this online relationship working towards being real-time? Did the two of you agree that you would not see others? Yes, you told him it's a hard limit, but did the two of you agree that you would be monogamous? If it's staying an online relationship, good luck with imposing what would equate to chastity on a Dom. If not, it really depends on what the two of you agreed to. If you're still in the negotiation phase then he might think you're both free actors while you got the impression otherwise. Was it a reasonable impression? I don't know. That all having been said, in my opinion, him telling you every detail about another sexual encounter (although again, I'm unclear if this is online only) is crass and inappropriate especially given the fact that you told him it would bother you. I don't know your reasons for wanting to be online only, if in fact you are, but I would suggest to you that before you require fidelity you need a real relationship and to actually see the person and know them and spend time with them. In my opinion, anything else is a romantic fairytale. Finally, the fact that how you will respond to him will be based on what people say here on this forum is absurd. We don't know you or him or your relationship and you don't know us or our competence or whether what we say is even sane. You need to figure out what a relationship is for you and how you want to deal with this one.
< Message edited by laurell3 -- 11/18/2007 4:33:40 PM >
_____________________________
I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence. When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.
|