RE: Admiring the enemy...

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: Admiring the enemy...

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Admiring the enemy...

Page: << < prev 1 2 3 [4]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Admiring the enemy... - 11/24/2007 10:48:22 AM

Real0ne

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

Not according to the prints.

you really want to try and sell the idea that they used gypsum for core columns? i'm in stitches with laughter.

Im not talking about devices used back in 1945 but as long as you are talking about steel being bent, there was also greater than 700 ton chunks of the steel structure thrown over 400 feet. Thats farther than a foorball field.

700 ton chunks over 400 feet. i dont have to look to far for a hidden agenda.

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Raechard)

Profile

Post #: 61

RE: Admiring the enemy... - 11/24/2007 11:20:58 AM

Raechard

Posts: 3513
Joined: 3/10/2007
From: S.E. London U.K.
Status: offline

When exactly did I say they used gypsum for structural columns? Do you know what I mean by cladding? I’m talking about the outside membrane that protects the inside from the elements such as rain and wind. Cladding is not often used to contribute to the overall structural stability of the building. Yes gypsum was used in that building for cladding, I don’t think that’s a controversial issue and yes that is what the dust is you see, strangely enough.

What do you mean be the steel being thrown? Look at the overall height of the buildings and then look at the angle at which they began to collapse. Did you expect the structures to fall down vertically downwards? Steel being found so far away from the centre of the structure does not tax my brain as to how it got there. It was just a gigantic store of potential energy and when the tipping point came that energy was released. Also how big was that hole they excavated afterwards?

_____________________________

えへまにんへえや
Nobody wants to listen to the same song over and over again!

(in reply to Real0ne)

Profile

Post #: 62

RE: Admiring the enemy... - 11/24/2007 1:37:21 PM

Real0ne

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

What you see in that pic is part of the core.

No absolutely not would i expect a structure to fall into the greatest resistance, at least not by itself without the help of massive explosives as can be seen in the clip on my footer. The fact that they did fall precisely vertical is the first clue it was a demolition, the second clu was all the testimony of bombs and the last clue is the actually taping of those explosions.

Yeh as a matter of fact I do know how much potential energy was sitting up there and posted it once upon a time on here to make the point that there was not even enough there to turn the floors into 60micron particulate much less the rest of the energy that was needed to create the molten pools that lasted for 6 weeks while cooling water was being poured on them all the while, and then also to destroy the exoskeleton and core, so whats your point that i should be calculating using gigantic as a reference number for the available energy?

What hole? you mean the one where they totally blew out the center of building 6 and building 5? The same ones that raged with fire all day and the ragged skeletons stood just fine? LOL

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Raechard)

Profile

Post #: 63