RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


GoddessDustyGold -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 5:58:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinksugarsub

Dusty, i did not post in reply to You specifically.  i posted to state my opinion as to what fears really motivate some people who complain about immigration, legal or not, into the US.  i lived in north Florida during the Mariel Boat Lift and remember the hatred of somes whites towards the influx of Cubans and the code-speak for this was "let them learn to speak English".  Dade County is now and has been for some time primarially hispanic, and it behooves visitors and residents to become bilingual as a fact of life. 
 
i can't imagine why You felt singled out by my post, and i'm sorry You were distressed unnecesarially.
 
pinksugarsub


I appreciate your answer, pink.
I did not feel singled out, per se,  but I did feel that I was being specifically addressed.  Your post was in response to Mine and I did mention "learning English" in the post.  That, coupled with the time of the publication of your post indicated to Me that you were specifically referring to My thoughts on this issue.   
I was not aware of any "code speak" during the Mariel boat lift.  It concerns Me that you would jump to a conclusion, so many years later, that referring to the massive lack of interest in learning English would be some sort of code for racism.  Honestly, it doesn't even make much sense to Me.  If one resents that the people will not learn English, I would not consider that a sign of racism.  I would consider it a sign of disrespect on the part of the one refusing to learn the new language.  Feeling that disrespect has nothing to do with race.  It has to do with feeling disrespected.  *shrug*  But I was not in Florida, so I have no idea why this would be code speak for that.   
Rest assured it is not the case here.
Thank you for clearing this up.
 




thompsonx -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 7:12:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Seeks, "sporty types?"
Do you mean like "Sportin' Ladies?"[:D]
Now there's another "culture" that I'd REALLY like to be more involved with!

popeye:
If you are serious then you might consider moving to Nevada where we embrace that sort of multiculturalism.  We have 34 licensed establishments for the express purpose of helping people like you become more closely acquainted with people like them.
thompson




thompsonx -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 7:39:06 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessMine

Oh, and Seeksfemslave - I have TB - WHAT, WHAT!

Love,
GM

GM:
I looked at your website and it is true you do have TB (tasty breast)
thompson




Lordandmaster -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 7:55:23 AM)

I don't think it's an unreasonable extreme.  You're at a bar in a questionable neighborhood, you're drunk, you know you shouldn't drive, so you do the right thing and call a taxi--and the asshole won't take you because he's Muslim and you're drunk.  What's implausible in that scenario?  Besides, the social problems involved with taxi drivers who refuse certain customers are well-known and well-documented.  I'm sure you're aware of the uproar a few years ago about taxi drivers who wouldn't take black customers in Manhattan.  I suppose you'd say they should be free to pick up anyone they like, right?  Well, I just don't agree with that--any more than I agree that restaurants can choose to serve white patrons and not black patrons.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

At the airport, yes, it's a loss of 30 seconds to the customers.  Out in the middle of nowhere, it could be much worse than that.  And if the customer is drunk and needs a taxi to get home safely, it could be the difference between life and death. 


I truly am not picking on you, LaM, or trying to drag this out, but I want to address this since it seems to Me a perfect example of how so many things are extrapolated out to the extreme, remote and unlikely possibilities. 
The situation is about busy areas where there are other options for a ride.  I sincerely doubt that a drunk might be "in the middle of nowhere" and hoping that a taxi will come along eventually, and in the back of his/her foggy mind, also hoping that it won't be a Muslim driver who will refuse to take him/her home.




EPGAH -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 8:16:09 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold
After careful analysis I am determining that you are, indeed, addressing My post, pinksugarsub.  I need to respond, and I will let you know right now that I am working very hard to be as diplomatic as possible.
Please point out to Me where I complained about America becoming "less white".  I resent the implication, and I would point out that this is a very fine example of how we must all be so PC because we might be accused of racism if we have any problem with someone of a different color.   Heaven knows it couldn't possibly be because what they are doing is illegal and they don't belong here with an illegal staus.  Oh,. no...it must be because their skin is a different color.  That has to be the real (shhhhhhhhh) secret reason, doesn't it? 
The article linked in the OP also was not about racism.  If you read it carefully, it has nothing to do with that.  And I am tired of people reading a subtext that doesn't exist.    And the posts on this thread also have nothing to do with racism.  It is not about immigrationIt is about illegal entry into this country and the disrespect shown to the legal residents.  It is just so unfortunate that the main body of peoples who are causing these problems also happen to be of color.  For this would never come up if we were having a problem with Canadians sneaking in from the north, would it?  We might be up in arms about it, but at least the dreaded "race" accusation would not be entering the picture. 
I have no need to bond with illegal aliens.  They are taking jobs away from people who need them, they are draining the county resources, they are filling up our jails and they are marching in our streets demanding rights they have no business demanding.  And don't anyone come at Me about how they are doing the jobs no one here will do.  It is just so much BS.  My daughter makes less than many of the illegals here, and she is a pre-school teacher working full time while going to college, and paying her own way, I might add!  My other daughter works in a legal office and makes considerably less than $10 per hour.  So please, everybody stop with the less than minimum wage defense.  There is not a man standing in front of Home Depot who will take a job for less than $10 per hour.  There is not a woman working for a private home cleaning service who earns less than $10 per hour.  There is not one who has knocked on My door and asked if he can weed My yard.  He will only charge $10 per hour.  I am tired of hearing these people defended because they are working for the dregs while we all party and bring home big fat paychecks.  It just ain't so!   It makes good copy for the press, but it is a completely skewed take on what is really going on.  I live with it every single day! 
Israel accepted the Ethiopian Jews.  They were not illegal aliens sneaking into Israel.  
I prefer to bond with upstanding people who are making their way honestly in the world.  I have great compassion for the many who are just trying to make a better life.  That doesn't excuse the fact that they should not be here under the circumstances they are.  The United States can no longer afford to be forgiving and just keep taking in the rest of the world..  Or rescuing the rest of the world in their own little corner because those people can't get here.  I can no longer afford it...you can no longer afford it.  It has nothing to do with race.  We are already being seriously injured by the mass illegal influx of these people.  It doesn't help when they add insult to that injury. 
Please re-read My posts and be specific regarding your perception of My racism.  I will appreciate a public response on this thread and will be checking for that response.  If you can't think of an appropriate defense, then a simple "kumbaya" will do. 

I second that! Not wanting more criminals isn't racist, it's simply painted that way to help show the invaders as victims, even "martyrs", rather than parasites!




stella41b -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 9:45:32 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

quote:

ORIGINAL: stella41b

Had these colonial powers and imperialists traded honestly in their colonies and not exploited them but invested in their infrastructure and economies then there might not have been any need for illegal immigrants.



If thats so why have so many from Eastern Europe come to the UK ? Are you really saying that the Polish were better off under Russian rule ? I suspect most Poles would rather have the freedom they have today, even if they have had a rough ride since communism fell.


Politesub53, they haven't come here for freedom, but simply to be employed. Am I really saying that the Polish were better off under communism? I can't personally say, as I've only ever been in the Soviet Union under communism, and first went to Poland when it was under Walesa's rule. But yes, the majority of those who can remember living under communist rule would prefer to have that system return.

Why? I can give you 10 reasons at least:

1. free healthcare and subsidized prescriptions.
2. free education for everybody.
3. guaranteed employment in your chosen profession on the basis of your education, interests and abilities
4. low cost social housing
5. cheap but effective consumer goods, cheap nutritious healthy food which wasn't genetically modified or full of additives. Until Tescos and Geant came along all Polish fruit and vegetables were organic and free of chemicals. Ever bought a tin of Polish ham?
6 a rich and diverse social and cultural program, cheap or free access to theatres, cinemas, opera, ballet, concerts, and sporting events.
7. law and order, low rates of crime, safe streets. Consider that graffiti first appeared in Poland in the late 1990's
8. mutual respect - due to the inadequacies of the former system people relied on each other and trusted each other
9 free or subsidized holidays - by the sea, in the mountains, in certain cities, in a health spa
10. Dirt cheap travel, all forms of transport, buses, taxis, trains, even flights.

The only people harping on about the lack of freedom and human rights were the right wingers and Tories. Personally I feel that Stalin had the right idea, sending his secret police round to tell them to shut up or go to prison, gulags, or even 'disappear'. I think this would be a wonderful idea to introduce into Britain today.

The current waves of Poles by the way are fleeing the extreme right wing government of Lech Kaczynski which shares power with other extreme right wing parties and the Catholic Church.

I'm curious as to how you define freedom Politesub. Are you talking about the freedom that we enjoy in Britain today? And would you define freedom as giving up your home to work in this country for minimum wages, share a room with four other people (or live in a backpacker's hostel sleeping in a dorm with up to 50 others) and have very little disposable income? This isn't how just the Polish migrant workers live, or Eastern Europeans, but many young people from abroad working in this country.




popeye1250 -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 10:19:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinksugarsub

Dusty, i did not post in reply to You specifically.  i posted to state my opinion as to what fears really motivate some people who complain about immigration, legal or not, into the US.  i lived in north Florida during the Mariel Boat Lift and remember the hatred of somes whites towards the influx of Cubans and the code-speak for this was "let them learn to speak English".  Dade County is now and has been for some time primarially hispanic, and it behooves visitors and residents to become bilingual as a fact of life. 
 
i can't imagine why You felt singled out by my post, and i'm sorry You were distressed unnecesarially.
 
pinksugarsub


I was there in Key West during that Mariel boatlift operation in 1980 in the USCG.
Most of the people we picked up off the boats from Cuba were "white"- caucaision.
There were maybe 25% that were "black."




Politesub53 -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 11:24:14 AM)

Stella if you are correct that everything was better under communism, then Solidarnosc (sp)would not have risen in the dockyards. You assert everyone is fleeing a right wing government, where is your proof. There is no mention of a fascist purge in the media at all. people are comming here for one reason, money, when they arrive if they have poor working and living conditions they can always leave. You mention everyone had a job in the good old days of communism. Well someone is working in Poland as the national GDP is still much the same now.
You ask what i define as freedom, well the ability of the Poles to travel here if they wish, sounds better than your idea of having people rounded up and " Dealt with "

Still theres no need for you to worry is there, as you can always vote communism in when the next lection comes round 2010 i believe. Dont state shit like Stalin had the right idea, he was responsible for how many million deaths ( oh and include all the Polish in ww2 killed by the KGB )  Anyone who uses Stalin as shining light in politics deserves nothing but contempt in my book.
You know what, i always thought you were better than that.




EPGAH -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 11:27:44 AM)

I agree with your critique on Communism, HOWEVER, the fact that the GDP is much the same as you call it...Doesn't that suggest that the people leaving weren't contributing much?[;)]
And remember: You always have the freedom to leave YOUR home, you just can't expect the "freedom" to enter someone else's!




Politesub53 -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 11:33:08 AM)

Egpah the GDP of Poland dropped after the intital collapse of communism and has now risen again. My point is that is life was better under communism then surely the GDP would now be lower. I would have thought GDP was a fair indicator of how good or bad a country was doing, under whatever style of government.




EPGAH -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 11:37:35 AM)

Well, could be, actually, until we develop some way to look at a country's NET Domestic Production...Gross minus expesnses...I bet First World countries would suffer on that "score", brought down by an abundance of high-overhead welfare--sorry, "entitlement"--bureaucracies...Not to mention "loans" to other countries, or outright grants...
And crime-rate and/or corruption lowering that score by a percentage...First World nations tend to moralize and negotiate with criminals![;)]




GoddessDustyGold -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 11:37:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

I don't think it's an unreasonable extreme.  You're at a bar in a questionable neighborhood, you're drunk, you know you shouldn't drive, so you do the right thing and call a taxi--and the asshole won't take you because he's Muslim and you're drunk.  What's implausible in that scenario?  Besides, the social problems involved with taxi drivers who refuse certain customers are well-known and well-documented.  I'm sure you're aware of the uproar a few years ago about taxi drivers who wouldn't take black customers in Manhattan.  I suppose you'd say they should be free to pick up anyone they like, right?  Well, I just don't agree with that--any more than I agree that restaurants can choose to serve white patrons and not black patrons.

quote:

ORIGINAL: GoddessDustyGold

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

At the airport, yes, it's a loss of 30 seconds to the customers.  Out in the middle of nowhere, it could be much worse than that.  And if the customer is drunk and needs a taxi to get home safely, it could be the difference between life and death. 


I truly am not picking on you, LaM, or trying to drag this out, but I want to address this since it seems to Me a perfect example of how so many things are extrapolated out to the extreme, remote and unlikely possibilities. 
The situation is about busy areas where there are other options for a ride.  I sincerely doubt that a drunk might be "in the middle of nowhere" and hoping that a taxi will come along eventually, and in the back of his/her foggy mind, also hoping that it won't be a Muslim driver who will refuse to take him/her home.



*laffing*  Well, since you have now moved this drunk from the "middle of nowhere" to a *questionable neighborhood*, I will capitulate.  [8D]
By the way, who decided it was a questionable neighborhood? What makes it questionable? 
Rhetorical! 
I am sorry but I am having a bit of a giggle here.   If I don't laugh then I will surely have to cry, due to an extreme lack of sleep and a frustration that things like this can never be resolved to the satisfaction of all.
There were valid reasons for the basic civil rights movement.  That was a matter of serious racial discrimination and something serious had to happen for people to sit up and take notice!  I can't place a Muslim taxi driver as a personal business reserving a right to refuse service to someone in the same category.  This is a moral dilemna for many of them and that needs to be respected.  I realize you feel it applies in all situations such as this.  I just disagree and feel that we are too easily stepping over boundaries.   
No, a restaurant should not be able to discriminate based upon race.  It is morally repugnant as well as illegal.    But they can reserve the right to refuse service if it is not based upon race.  I think that there was an episode not that long ago with O.J. and a restaurant?  If I am not mistaken a racist accusation was thrown even though it had nothing to do with that. 
On the other hand, I guess I do feel that a taxi driver, who may consider himself in a potentially unsafe situation, should be able to refuse to pick up a fare.  It is hard to prove the mindset, unless they flat out say that they don't care and that is the reason.  It is a sticky wicket, so I would have to go back to My rhetorical question.  Who decides that the taxi driver is not making what s/he feels is a rational decision not based upon race?  But based upon questionable (?) behavior, questionable (?) attitude and even a questionable (?) neighborhood... 
It is all so easily used and abused.  [sm=banghead.gif]

Edited twice now for punctuation and terribly dyslexic typos. 




pinksugarsub -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 12:43:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

quote:

ORIGINAL: pinksugarsub

Dusty, i did not post in reply to You specifically.  i posted to state my opinion as to what fears really motivate some people who complain about immigration, legal or not, into the US.  i lived in north Florida during the Mariel Boat Lift and remember the hatred of somes whites towards the influx of Cubans and the code-speak for this was "let them learn to speak English".  Dade County is now and has been for some time primarially hispanic, and it behooves visitors and residents to become bilingual as a fact of life. 
 
i can't imagine why You felt singled out by my post, and i'm sorry You were distressed unnecesarially.
 
pinksugarsub


I was there in Key West during that Mariel boatlift operation in 1980 in the USCG.
Most of the people we picked up off the boats from Cuba were "white"- caucaision.
There were maybe 25% that were "black."


It takes great sensitivity to address the myriad of races and religions that we classify as "Hispanic".  i remember one young man of Spanish descent, having come here from Puetro Rico, very conflicted about whether to list himself as a "minority" for hiring purposes.  In general, we tend to consider A/anyone "Hispanic" if they or their ancestors came from a Spanish-speaking country; if their name sounds "Hispanic"; or if they lay claim to being "Hispanic".  But there are and always have been diverse and sometimes antagonistic groups under the "Hispanic" umbrella.
 
Must have been a very exciting time in Key West, Popeye.  Was certainly exciting in North Florida.
 
pinksugarsub




NorthernGent -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 1:13:09 PM)

General reply:

If you're going to force a common identity upon people, what constitutes the identity and who decides? I think this needs to be laid out before arriving at any conclusion on this topic.

I think it is in everyone's interest to impose a common language in a country the size of England in order to support the prosperity of the individual/immigrant and the wider community. I work with people who speak Urdu and a smidgen of broken English, and it doesn't help anyone; to be fair to the Urdu speakers I've come across, they want to speak English. Any other necessary commonalities? Rule of Law, hard work, family.......?




popeye1250 -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 1:27:09 PM)

Pink, oh it was "exciting" alright.
What people don't remember is that these were not people escaping from a communist country though.
Castro cleaned out his prisons!
For all we knew any(one) of the people we were plucking out of the many different type of boats could have been a murderer, rapist or molester. We had to treat them all as "prisoners" until we knew who we were dealing with. And there were some who were very obviously mentally ill.
I forget the name of that big prison that we took them to in Miami "Chrome Ave???" It's been a while.
And Key West harbor was jammed with any kind of boat you could imagine! What a mess!




EPGAH -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 1:36:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent
If you're going to force a common identity upon people, what constitutes the identity and who decides? I think this needs to be laid out before arriving at any conclusion on this topic.
I think it is in everyone's interest to impose a common language in a country the size of England in order to support the prosperity of the individual/immigrant and the wider community. I work with people who speak Urdu and a smidgen of broken English, and it doesn't help anyone; to be fair to the Urdu speakers I've come across, they want to speak English. Any other necessary commonalities? Rule of Law, hard work, family.......?

YES! Good to point out! However, at least England HAS an official language...America doesn't, and to add insult to (financial and/or cultural) injury, some want SPANISH to be our official language, even though our Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and even the Amendments are all in English...That, and the little fact that America was FOUNDED by rogue English should cement English as our language of the realm, right? Of course, the presumption was that since all signatories were English (or at least IN English), there was no need for an official language!
That said, America is slightly bigger than England (Someone once said England was about the size of Arkansas?), so a common language here is even MORE important, otherwise, we might be bothered with the same secession crap as Canada has to deal with![;)]




EPGAH -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 1:38:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
What people don't remember is that these were not people escaping from a communist country though.
Castro cleaned out his prisons!
For all we knew any(one) of the people we were plucking out of the many different type of boats could have been a murderer, rapist or molester. We had to treat them all as "prisoners" until we knew who we were dealing with. And there were some who were very obviously mentally ill.
I forget the name of that big prison that we took them to in Miami "Chrome Ave???" It's been a while.
And Key West harbor was jammed with any kind of boat you could imagine! What a mess!

Note, however, that America has never "cleaned out" our prisoners that way...Send them all to Africa, or China, and see how THEY treat invading criminals...They could make it a Survivor special--one where the contestants might die, or are in any way endangered!




stella41b -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 1:39:26 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Stella if you are correct that everything was better under communism, then Solidarnosc (sp)would not have risen in the dockyards. You assert everyone is fleeing a right wing government, where is your proof. There is no mention of a fascist purge in the media at all. people are comming here for one reason, money, when they arrive if they have poor working and living conditions they can always leave. You mention everyone had a job in the good old days of communism. Well someone is working in Poland as the national GDP is still much the same now.
You ask what i define as freedom, well the ability of the Poles to travel here if they wish, sounds better than your idea of having people rounded up and " Dealt with "

Still theres no need for you to worry is there, as you can always vote communism in when the next lection comes round 2010 i believe. Dont state shit like Stalin had the right idea, he was responsible for how many million deaths ( oh and include all the Polish in ww2 killed by the KGB ) Anyone who uses Stalin as shining light in politics deserves nothing but contempt in my book.
You know what, i always thought you were better than that.


Okay, let's start with this Stalin thing. You really think I was being serious when I suggested that? I wasn't, but you know I was making a very pointed reference to one party states and the hatred that left and right have for each other. You appear to have fallen into this trap. Stalin also gave us the United Nations. I don't quote Stalin as a shining light in politics but I like to keep perspective.

It's the same thing as Saddam Hussein, who was supposed to be one of the most evil political leaders of the modern world. The 'coalition forces' (I won't use the term American) even put him on trial. What happened? They executed him even before the second trial came to court. This to me wasn't justice, it was a lynching.

And you seriously think the media are going to report on a fascist purge? So what about the purging of homosexuals and lesbians and other minorities? What about the xenophobia and racism which is socially acceptable right through Eastern Europe? You want proof? I'm going by what Poles who chose to stay in Poland are telling me. You want proof? Go find one of the older Poles and ask them what life is really like in Poland and who Lech Kaczynski and his twin brother Jaroslaw really are. Ask them about Roman Giertych, Radio Maryja, and the League of Polish Families (LPR).

You can even visit www.gazeta.pl - it's got articles in English.

As for your definition of 'freedom' saying that the Poles can travel to the UK if they wish, this strikes me as having the same logic as the Norman Tebbit 'on your bike' argument in the early 1980's. Yes they have come here for money and work, which is a lot better than six months of Polish dole at £10 a week. Then what? Go through the streets collecting waste paper and empty beer cans all day, every day just to get a bit of money together? Well they can't do that because some of them have fathers and uncles who are already doing that. But you offer half of them a decent job back in Poland and they'd go back like a shot, just to be back with their family and friends.

Oh yes sure, there are people working in Poland, I agree with you, and am not surprised that the GDP is the same. But you take out the significant number who've gone abroad to work and also the significant number on benefits and sick and you'll probably find that it's the corporations and companies who are benefitting far more than your average employee who has to work much harder for less.

But please don't tell me that the right wing - which is what you appear to be implying - is any better. Margaret Thatcher is definitely not any sort of heroine but this is where it all started. It started with the dockers in Liverpool in 1980, it became apparent in St Pauls and Southall that year, in Brixton, Toxteth, Handsworth and Chapeltown in 1981, Wapping in 1982, the Miner's Strike in 1984, and so on, the Poll Tax, the Black Wednesday of 1987, and it has gone right through and all through this time what have people been doing? Sticking their heads in the sand, hiding behind the Daily Telegraph on the 8.32 to Charing Cross, pretending that it doesn't exist and that it will never happen to them.. and all along it's been the same system as it's been right through history since the time of Edward I - divide and rule.

But you know, given the choice between communism and this 'freedom' and 'democracy' we have in this country, which is based, just as in the times of Charles Dickens, on the exploitation of the weaker and less fortunate I'd rather choose communism.

Only I don't intend to be here in 2010. I'm proud to be British, and yes, I'm proud that British can indicate any member of the human race irrespective of skin colour, gender, ancestry, sexual orientation and religious belief, I love Britain, I love the people...

But when I see, as I have seen, four drunken suited types on a Friday night pissing on a homeless man sleeping in a sleeping bag on a quiet Soho street and laughing about it, taking photos with a mobile phone, I don't want to be here any more.

I don't accept this concept of 'freedom' when it only applies to bodies such as corporations, governments and companies and not to the individual, and I reject this concept of 'democracy' where I can be hated by others just for thinking or being different. A society is judged on the way it treats its poor, its sick and its vulnerable as to how civilised it is.

I may not end up in a better or more civilised place, I probably won't, but that isn't the point. The point is I will be expatriate and not living in this society any more.

However unlike the Poles, I am exercising my freedom - along with a lot of other Brits - and leaving.

I don't care what people think of me, this is what I see and this is my opinion.




popeye1250 -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 2:07:27 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: EPGAH

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250
What people don't remember is that these were not people escaping from a communist country though.
Castro cleaned out his prisons!
For all we knew any(one) of the people we were plucking out of the many different type of boats could have been a murderer, rapist or molester. We had to treat them all as "prisoners" until we knew who we were dealing with. And there were some who were very obviously mentally ill.
I forget the name of that big prison that we took them to in Miami "Chrome Ave???" It's been a while.
And Key West harbor was jammed with any kind of boat you could imagine! What a mess!

Note, however, that America has never "cleaned out" our prisoners that way...Send them all to Africa, or China, and see how THEY treat invading criminals...They could make it a Survivor special--one where the contestants might die, or are in any way endangered!


I think it was the "Chrome avenue detention center."
And for 10-15 years afterwards there was a crime wave in Florida linked to these people. Murders, rapes, muggings, robberies you name it!
No wonder the rest of the world thinks that they can use the U.S. as a dumping ground for their undesireables.
That peckerhead Carter never should have allowed that to happen.
Presidents "feel sorry" for everyone except Americans it seems.
Some countries won't even accept back their own deportees from the U.S. until the people in Washington start threatening their foreign aid checks!
That's what they make C-130's for, you put 50 of them in a giant packing crate with a huge parachute on it and drop them right back in their own countries.
Then you stop all foreign aid to those countries.
I just don't want to have to pay for all this stuff anymore!
Foreign countries have just become too "dependant" on U.S. Taxpayers.




Politesub53 -> RE: Multiculturalim is dangurous? (11/28/2007 2:30:55 PM)

Stella, if you was joking about Stalin then i was wrong to use the word contempt, i interpreted what you wrote and not the fact you was joking. While we are on about Stalin, The idea of the United nations was actually Winston Churchills, but i digress. You were the first to mention Thatcher, and as far as i am aware, i havent mentioned right wing at all. Only what it was like before communism and afterwards. What has Thatcher got to do with events in Poland, or for that matter the rise of the right wing. She took on the unions in the Uk and that was, in the view of many, a good thing. Talk about the miners, blame Scargill, he said he was going to bring down this ( democratically elected i may add ) government. Do you suggest he should have been allowed to do so. Blame Thatcher for everything, shes an easy target. Toxteth, Brixton, ect. Dont apportion any blame to the rioters but then answer me this, Here we are 25 years on, go to Brixton and see whats changed, even since Labour came to power ten years ago... Nothing, nada, zilch, the poor still get screwed, its how its always been and i doubt if it will change. Tell me about being poor, i grew up drinking from jam jars, so i have a bit of a clue. The working class in the UK have always been screwed, and the Unions screwed us some more by being political instead of trying to improve things. People get into power and enjoy the trappings, and for the most part any ideals they held close vanish, you only have to look at the present lot to see that.

Lets mention the guys you saw pissing on a homeless man, what politics did they hold, left wing ? right wing ? the answer doesnt matter, they acted like that because they were pathetic drunks, sadly it goes on.

I will read the links you posted about Poland but you stated yourself those people are here to work for monetary reasons. Blame the Polish government, Lech Kaczynski isnt a nice person, i grant you that. He stopped the gay right parades when he was mayor of Warsaw, but, and this is my point, He still got elected. I still say Poland is better off now than it was 20 years ago.

If you are hoping to find a better life there, i really hope you get what you are looking for.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625