Smith117 -> RE: mistress why cant your male slave have sex (12/2/2007 2:01:12 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Boondoggle quote:
ORIGINAL: bottomboy81 There is far too much to read and reply to, I don't have the time and patience. What a man wants (even if its his natural instinct), is WRONG, he is forbidden to ask for it and seen as a selfish person all because he expresses what he wants as a man. But a man must apply to what women want or else he is a fool. A woman is not a fool if she refuses to apply to what men want. This doesn't only apply to the BDSM scene but this applies also to the vanilla scene. I am not saying that women should drop everything and spread their legs but if women think men are entitled to nothing, why do women always think they have entitlements? Entitlement mentality seems to be something women are only allowed to have. I find it hard to believe that most women out there actually care about what men want, BUT men are the same. The problem is that its socially acceptable for a woman to not give a flying fuck to what men want but a man is always put down when he thinks the same about women. Think about what I said a few times. [Crazy liberal rant] What world do you (think) you live in? In the world in which I, and presumably most others, live, women have been oppressed at the hands of men for thousands of years and continue to be despite vast improvements in their 'granted' status. I'd like to experience this magical fantasy world where women run everything; I think it might be in better shape than this one. You see, in this world, men have been in power for ages and do everything they can to make sure they are the ones who stay in power. Interestingly, men have long understood that women held the power in sex, and so have spent many years demonizing it. This is why prostitution is illegal. This is why the Church condemns any sex that isn't using a woman's body strictly for procreation. This fear of sexual power is what has lead to both female and male ritual genital mutilation (circumcision). It's also the reason for the glaring societal double-standard for promiscuity (promiscuous women are sluts, promiscuous men are 'conquerers'). When men with power over women abuse this power and take advantage of women sexually, their ultimate motivation, whether they recognize it, much less admit it, or not, is to take that sexual power from women because they fear it. Then there's rape and abuse. I'm not saying women never perpetuate these crimes, because they do, but I think it's fairly safe to say that in the vast, overwhelming majority of cases, the men are the aggressors. Somehow, I doubt the victims felt any sense of entitlement. Whereas the perpetrators are clearly asserting (or attempting to, however temporarily) their power over the victim. When one person engages in this sort of non-consensual power exchange over another, if there is one party with the sense of entitlement, it's the rapist or abuser. If anyone needs to think about what you said and evaluate underlying prejudices, it's you. [/Crazy liberal rant] I think the one point I'd disagree with on this post is the conquerer title for promiscuous men. That may have one day been the case, but lately it seems that a guy who's promiscuous usually is called a player or a dog. And women, even his own friends, if they're mature enough, don't even consider him worthy of an actual relationship. Why do you think one guy would get pissed that his friend was dating his sister? Because guys know how guys are.
|
|
|
|