luckydog1
Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006 Status: offline
|
I would consider architecture of skyscrapers to be relevant. I consider architecture of High school gyms to not be relevant. Some one actually in demolitions. So you consider Jowelnko to be an expert and his word is fact on this stuff? I watched the Zembla interview with Jowelnklo by the Socialist run VARA/NPS. I could not find any actuall credentials for the guy, but will believe he works in Demolitions. He was being given estimates made up by the interviewer and commenting on them. And was quite clear that he did not have the data, and needed to see pictures of the side of 7 that was facing 1&2. He, assuming the estimates and projections provided by Zembla, agreed it was unimaginable. I did notice that he made no claim as to the speed being wrong. More importantly he completely disagreed with your assesment of what happened to 1&2. Do you cite this guy as an expert when he agrees and consider him ignorant when he disagrees, on the same subject matter? I also note that this article states as fact that 7 was damaged by debrie taking out up to 8? collumns, which you have consistently disagreed with claiming it was not damaged. I wonder what he would say if told the basement was full of Diesel and Propane tanks. To anyone reading along, explosions do not equal bombs. All kinds of things can explode in a fire. And the WTCs were full of them. Electrical sub stations. Natural gas lines, Propane tanks, Generators, Computer monitors.
|