RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown

Collarspace Discussion Forums

Home Login Search

RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown

View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity >> RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown - 12/10/2007 8:18:34 PM

Real0ne

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

yet anyone who wants can look at the video interview I posted and see that real is lying...simple enough

Who really cares if the majority on one his Neo Nazi web sites agree with him.

Here is a perfect example of reals "evidence" Its a guy saying that there was no second plane, it was a bomb.

Rule here is an eye witness for you:

WTC Witness - No Second Plane, It Was a Bomb Its short less than 30 seconds so take a look.

the man says he "could see the whole thing"

Which is absolutly impossible. You can not see all 4 sides of a building at once. Real having never been to NYC has no idea of the scale of the thing. To claim you can see the wholle thing is impossible from anywhere on the surface of the earth. It is a man in shock talking to a camera. It is as false as if he were saying 2+2 = 9.

But to Real it is absoluty true and a smoking gun of some kind.

enough said....

Basically all of the evidence real posts is this waek and ridiculous

Damn man warn me next time!   fuck i spit my beer all over the keyboard and monitor i started laughing so hard!     This just keeps getting better!

Doctor lucky was on site and personally gave the man a psychological evaluation!   Did you examine him for anal retentivity issues too? LMAO

Hey lucky you only need to be on one side of the building to see if a plane hit it or not.   you know 2+2 = 4 eh?

You keep wondering why people bitch all the time at how illiterate you are but you mean you dont understand the most simple english language either?

nothing like losing your credibility and peoples respect for you in one clean sweep...

I would feel sorry for you but i cant stop LMFAO

Oh and btw saying i have never been to nyc is a flat out lie buddy, you dont know me nor do you know about where I have been.

damn man you will say any fucking thing i swear i never seen anyone as morally fucking bankrupt as you are.

< Message edited by Real0ne -- 12/10/2007 8:34:49 PM >

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to luckydog1)

Profile

Post #: 141

RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown - 12/10/2007 10:47:55 PM

Real0ne

Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline

Hey rule check out the color of the crash smoke and the overdub

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=633568000346389890

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to Rule)

Profile

Post #: 142

RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown - 12/10/2007 11:59:33 PM

Rule

Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1
Here is a perfect example of reals "evidence" Its a guy saying that there was no second plane, it was a bomb.

Rule here is an eye witness for you:

WTC Witness - No Second Plane, It Was a Bomb Its short less than 30 seconds so take a look.

the man says he "could see the whole thing"

Which is absolutly impossible. You can not see all 4 sides of a building at once. Real having never been to NYC has no idea of the scale of the thing. To claim you can see the wholle thing is impossible from anywhere on the surface of the earth. It is a man in shock talking to a camera. It is as false as if he were saying 2+2 = 9.

I saw that video already, as RealOne posted that link earlier in this thread. Unlike you, I deem this testimony credible, but that is because I know that there was no second plane present - and that the first plane did not exist at all. So it is all a matter of perspective what testimonies and facts are believed by whom.

Of course Real One is correct: it suffices for a witness to see the face of the building were the explosion or alleged airplane entry occurred.

What bothers me is your assertion that the towers did not collapse at free fall velocity. My intuitive reaction to that is that is does not matter at which floor the explosives that melted through the outer columns were set off. The only thing that determines velocity of free fall collapse is when the top floor hit level ground. I believe we had that identical discussion also about one year ago.

About a year ago the insistent remark that the collapse did not start at the top floor, caused me to re-examine the video's. I had before taken a very hard look at them and concluded that the collapse of one of the towers did start at the top floor, but it was tough to discern that. When I took another look at those video's it was even tougher and I concluded that it might not have started at the top floor. Eventually I changed the paragraph that I had written about were the collapses started.

< Message edited by Rule -- 12/11/2007 12:13:17 AM >

(in reply to luckydog1)

Profile

Post #: 143

RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown - 12/11/2007 12:26:22 AM

Rule

Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Hey rule check out the color of the crash smoke and the overdub

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=633568000346389890

I cannot judge that, as I am not an expert at judging that. But I do admire the acting abilities of those firemen. I last year determined that they were accomplices in the scam. It is amazing that a handful of acting firemen and a dubbed in airplane were sufficient to fool the world into the believe that an airplane flew into that tower. (I have to admit that at first they fooled me as well. It was only when in 2006 I examined the evidence and then concluded that the airplane was not present in New York and subsequently started to investigate the movie and witnesses about this plane, suspecting that they were frauds, that I found the research of others who had come to the same conclusion.)

(in reply to Real0ne)

Profile

Post #: 144

RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown - 12/11/2007 12:56:20 AM

luckydog1

Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline

No, if you look at any of the videos of the event, you see the plane hits on side and fireballs blow out all 3 other side within one second. You can not see much of the sky from lower Manhattan. The WTC is like a mountian cliff. From most postitons you would just see the fireballs coming out of the side and the plane flight would not be visible. From Accross the river the plane would be much more visible. If you had ever been there you would be aware of this. Real you were even trying to argue that there were no natural gas lines and that there were no restaurants at the top. You never were there. Arguing that any building in Manahattan is not hooked up to the natural gas pipes is retarted. Just plain ignorant. Of couse you have to because the natural gas explains a lot of explosions and lingering fires and melted steel. Just like you have to pretend that this ridicuols statement by a person in shock is true. Its the best evidence you have. And a video of a chimney, with the outer edge of a fireball.

It is logically impossible to see all sides of a building from the ground. Especially from the base of the WTC. What the man said was impossible. Anyone who has ever been to Manhattan, knows this.

(in reply to Rule)

Profile

Post #: 145

RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown - 12/11/2007 1:07:06 AM

Rule

Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline