Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: luckydog1
So you are uwilling to look at the Zembla interview...no real surprise there.
Please name the Senators who agree with you on this stuff real, since you claim that a few do....
Feel free to show me anything that Dr Wood and FEMA report agree on. Of course you know that FEMA was not involved in the investigation.
mkinney, and the minnesota dude for 2 there are a couple more that i dont know their names off the top of my head. You mean you are that uninformed on this stuff huh....
fema, nist and the 911 commission agree with her on the time it took the wtc buildings to fall. 9 seconds and 10 or 10 and 11 I forget which, Like i said I am way beyond these baasics and have not read them for a long time. Feel free to do your own research.
Right fema was involved in the cover up.
Of course I am willing to look at what ever it is you looked at.
I do not know how much more clear anyone can be lucky. I asked you to give me the "exact" site you were looking at so there would be no confusion.
See lucky right here: quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
ok lucky I was not able to validate what you said about jowenko so give me the specific link you looked at and time mark to make sure we are looking at the same thing or i have to call bullshit on you.
That means I want to make sure that I am looking at the EXACT SAME THING YOU DID.
Since you dont want to give me that its fine, but now I will call bullshit. DJ did not "examine it". He looked at the loose change video which only show the squibs which may or may not be explosives. That was all that was available to him when he did that intervierw. The loose change video does not show the explosions and danny commented on how "bizarre" it was the way they came down. Now days we have helecopter videos and several private videos that confirm the bright white flashes cause those squibs.
DJ did look at the plans for the wtc7, he did not look at the plans of wtc 1 and 2 because they were not available at the time and the methods used on wtc 1 and 2 were not standards demolition which you can see by the way he talks that is what he expected to see was a "standard" demolityion and since it did not fit that scenario felt it was a collapse.
If DJ were shown the footage we have today and presented with the actual drawings for the building his analysis would be different for 1 and 2.
wtc7 was a classic demolition and to my surprise you did not recognize that and probably still dont, i certainly wouldnt expect you to recognize a nonclassic demolition that even fooled a pro when viewed from a distance.
remember he did not see any building drawings like he did on wtc 7. If your video shows him looking at actual design or damage drawings for wtc 1 and 2 like he did with 7 by all means point out precisely where he does because on the zembla footage i seen he does not so dont pretend that he examined it when he did not.
So i am calling bullshit, he did not "examine" the demolition of 1 and 2. He only seen the loose change video which shows the building imploding from a distance to far away to see and or hear the explosions used to bring it down. He did not see any of that footage.
< Message edited by Real0ne -- 12/9/2007 12:14:04 PM >
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile
Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?
Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!
"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|
RE: 9.11 "mystery plane" still unknown - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread