grizzledathlete
Posts: 12
Joined: 12/20/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: takenbyjohnr07 i read this story when i was a teenager and parts of it turned me on, Yet when i just saw the movie they made out of the book i looked at it in a different light. To me it made her out to be a tramp. She was loaned out to everyone, even complete strangers which is fine, but what i don't understand is. When she claimed to be in love with Sir Stephan and he clearly hated loaning her out, Why did he do it? He never watched or stayed and it clearly made him sick.(in the movie) Yet with every stranger she was given to she loved it.If you loved someone and you knew it hurt them to loan you out. Why go? Also if it hurts you why loan her out. The movie made no sense to me. Did it to any of You?Please remember i am reffering to the movie and not to the book. Thanks Yes, it made perfect sense to me. Why did O obey and allow herself to be loaned out? Because she has agreed to be Sir Stephen's slave and to allow herself to be used as he wishes. She has the right not to be his slave any longer, but if she is his slave, she does not have the right to disobey. By the point in the movie (and book) where she is loaned to Sir Stephen's two friends she loves being his slave, and so she gladly obeys. The night that O first meets Sir Stephen, he correctly understands that part of the reason she obeys Rene is that she loves him, and part of the reason is that she is "easy." By the end of the movie she obeys because she is Sir Stephen's slave. That is a profound change that I may not be expressing very well. Why did Sir Stephen loan her out, even though in the movie it appears that he is reluctant to do so? First, no mention of reluctance is made in the book. The show of reluctance in the movie was the director's or the actor's interpretation of how Sir Stephen felt. In both the movie and the book it is clear that the next day when one of the men, Eric, wants O as his own, Sir Stephen is upset and quite concerned that she will agree. He does not want to lose her. She makes it clear that she belongs to him. For a while, I was associated with a group that claimed to be the model for the society of the chateau mentioned in the book and movie. I don't know if it is true or not, but my experience with them shed some light on what may have been going through Sir Stephen's mind in either the book or the movie. Sir Stephen belongs to the society of the chateau. It is a group of dominant men, which has existed for generations. Their members enjoy and are expert at seducing, enslaving and enjoying female slaves. They are not satisfied with going to a munch or some short scene play. They want to own women who are totally enslaved and willing to enthusiastically do all the things necessary to serve and satisfy their masters. O is not the first slave to be owned by the society. Over the generations, the society has perfected a process for enslaving women. They receive basic training during an initial two week stay at Roissy. Over a period of months, their master and a mentor refine their training in the day to day world (in O's case, Rene's mentor Sir Stephen falls in love with her and wants her for his own). The slaves are then sent to Samois, to learn that they are just as much a slave in an all female enviroment. They return to their "normal" life, and have further prescribed experiences: being loaned to other society members in a "normal life" setting, seducing another woman to be recruited as a society slave, and developing pride in being revealed as a slave. Then they are returned to Roissy to serve the society as prostitutes. Because the story ends, we do not know what occurs in the process after that. If that is what is really happening in the Story of O, Sir Stephen's reluctance is more understandable, but as a good member of the society he goes through with it anyway.
< Message edited by grizzledathlete -- 12/21/2007 11:39:21 AM >
|