lusciouslips19
Posts: 9792
Joined: 9/8/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bipolarber The term for this kind of selective reality is "pornotopia." It's where an author deliberately ignores inconvienient realities in order to keep the story engaging to their audiance. Since little problems like unwanted pregnancy, STD's and rude bodily functions would only serve to "snap" the audiance out of the story, they are eliminated from the universe. Porn is not the only example of this, of course. TV and movies are the same. Ever see Jack Bauer on "24" waste a half an hour taking a crap? Has anyone in the Star Trek universe EVER been seen going to the bathroom? (only exception: First Contact, when one character said he had to take a leak... turned out he was lying just to make a run for it.) Of course, since sex was forbidden on early TV, we were all treated to twin beds in every bedroom. "Pornotopias" like the Beauty trilogy, or "O" are all well and good, but I much prefer a more realistic style of fiction. I think this is why I consider Patrick Califia to be head and shoulders above the rest. He makes his characters fully human, and than includes needing to pee after having a couple of beers, farting in the middle of a scene, or needing an enema before getting into some serious ass play. In the past in my younger days I created my own. Well, not pornotopia as I was 8..... Ok, may, I was masurbating ay that age. HOWEVER, I could not picture my beloved Donny Osmond or any of his brother's ever needing a bathroom. those mormons were too good for that! Oh MY GOD did I just mention the Osmonds in a thread about The story of O? Blasphemy. I will surely burn for this
|