Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/30/2007 2:46:29 PM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice


quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY

What is interesting is how people choose to interpret what they read.  


That's certainly true. It's why good writers and editors strive for clarity (unless ambiguity is part of the artistic effect, of course).


Of course. 

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/30/2007 6:39:38 PM   
DollysSissyGirl


Posts: 27
Joined: 7/16/2007
Status: offline
They should do a poll about the accuracy of this poll. Bush would make a great president if this were bizarro world. Have a great day !

Best regards,

sissy

_____________________________

m i s t r e s s d o l l y . c o m


(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/30/2007 9:43:11 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

The mission, was to lower American casualties, promote greater stability, lower the influx of munitions from Iran, and speed the transition of day-to-day military operations, to Iraqi forces.


Wrong.

Under Public Law 110-28, the benchmarks were:

1. Forming a Constitutional Review Committee and then completing the constitutional review.
2. Enacting and implementing legislation on de-Ba’athification.
3. Enacting and implementing legislation to ensure the equitable distribution of hydrocarbon resources of the people of Iraq without regard to the sect or ethnicity of recipients, and enacting and implementing legislation to ensure that the energy resources of Iraq benefit Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, Kurds, and other Iraqi citizens in an equitable manner.
4. Enacting and implementing legislation on procedures to form semi-autonomous regions.
5. Enacting and implementing legislation establishing an Independent High Electoral Commission, provincial elections law, provincial council authorities, and a date for provincial elections.
6. Enacting and implementing legislation addressing amnesty.
7. Enacting and implementing legislation establishing a strong militia disarmament program to ensure that such security forces are
accountable only to the central government and loyal to the Constitution of Iraq.
8. Establishing supporting political, media, economic, and services committees in support of the Baghdad security plan.
9. Providing three trained and ready Iraqi brigades to support Baghdad operations.
10. Providing Iraqi commanders with all authorities to execute this plan and to make tactical and operational decisions, in consultation with U.S.
commanders, without political intervention, to include the authority to pursue all extremists, including Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias.
11. Ensuring that the Iraqi security forces are providing even-handed enforcement of the law.
12. Ensuring that, according to President Bush, Prime Minister Maliki said ‘‘the Baghdad security plan will not provide a safe haven for
any outlaws, regardless of [their] sectarian or political affiliation.’’
13. Reducing the level of sectarian violence in Iraq and eliminating militia control of local security.
14. Establishing all of the planned joint security stations in neighborhoods across Baghdad.
15. Increasing the number of Iraqi security forces’ units capable of operating independently.
16. Ensuring that the rights of minority political parties in the Iraqi legislature are protected.
17. Allocating and spending $10 billion in Iraqi revenues for reconstruction projects, including delivery of essential services, on an equitable basis.
18. Ensuring that Iraq’s political authorities are not undermining or making false accusations against members of the Iraqi security forces.

quote:


You and Petronius have set your own benchmarks


CONGRESS makes the Law.

They are the benchmarks set in US LAW.

If you're going to participate in this discussion, shouldn't you *ALREADY* know this?

Please provide a link to Public Law 110-28 which provides the exact bench marks you reference above.

From an official government source, please.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/30/2007 10:01:22 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
<psa>

Google geek that I am, I found a GAO Report on the benchmarks. It spells them out and says how the Iraqis are doing vis-a-vis each benchmark.

</psa>

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 1:24:48 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Don't you *ever* get fucking tired of being proven wrong?

I thought when you ran away from the last exchange about this, you learned your lesson, and got tired of the abuse. I guess you didn't.

My first response is "Go Fuck Yourself, and Do Your Own Homework". Then I decided it'd be more fun to just pwn you and make you my bitch publicly.




quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY brayed, like a jackass

Please provide a link to Public Law 110-28 which provides the exact bench marks you reference above.

From an official government source, please.

Firm



Smile when you swallow my load, bitch. Or will you whine that the GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE isn't official enough?

With all that whine, you shoulda been a sommelier.

http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ028.110

Section 1314.

To anticipate your next whine, "It's too long..." ( I hear that a lot ) I'll reproduce the relevant section here:

quote:


Sec. 1314. (a) Findings Regarding Progress in Iraq, the Establishment of Benchmarks to Measure That Progress, and Reports to Congress.--Congress makes the following findings:

(1) Over 145,000 American military personnel are currently serving in Iraq, like thousands of others since March 2003, with
the bravery and professionalism consistent with the finest traditions of the United States Armed Forces, and are deserving
of the strong support of all Americans.
(2) Many American service personnel have lost their lives, and many more have been wounded in Iraq; the American people
will always honor their sacrifice and honor their families.
(3) The United States Army and Marine Corps, including their Reserve components and National Guard organizations,

[[Page 121 STAT. 122]]

together with components of the other branches of the military, are performing their missions while under enormous strain from
multiple, extended deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan. These deployments, and those that will follow, will have a lasting
impact on future recruiting, retention, and readiness of our Nation's all volunteer force.
(4) Iraq is experiencing a deteriorating problem of sectarian and intrasectarian violence based upon political
distrust and cultural differences among factions of the Sunni and Shia populations.
(5) Iraqis must reach political and economic settlements in order to achieve reconciliation, for there is no military
solution. The failure of the Iraqis to reach such settlements to support a truly unified government greatly contributes to the
increasing violence in Iraq.
(6) The responsibility for Iraq's internal security and halting sectarian violence rests with the sovereign Government
of Iraq.
(7) In December 2006, the bipartisan Iraq Study Group issued a valuable report, suggesting a comprehensive strategy that
includes new and enhanced diplomatic and political efforts in Iraq and the region, and a change in the primary mission of U.S.
forces in Iraq, that will enable the United States to begin to move its combat forces out of Iraq responsibly.
(8) The President said on January 10, 2007, that ``I've made it clear to the Prime Minister and Iraq's other leaders that
America's commitment is not open-ended'' so as to dispel the contrary impression that exists.
(9) It is essential that the sovereign Government of Iraq set out measurable and achievable benchmarks and President Bush
said, on January 10, 2007, that ``America will change our approach to help the Iraqi government as it works to meet these
benchmarks''.
(10) As reported by Secretary of State Rice, Iraq's Policy Committee on National Security agreed upon a set of political,
security, and economic benchmarks and an associated timeline in September 2006 that were: (A) reaffirmed by Iraq's Presidency
Council on October 6, 2006; (B) referenced by the Iraq Study Group; and (C) posted on the President of Iraq's Web site.
(11) On April 21, 2007, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated that ``our [American] commitment to Iraq is long-term,
but it is not a commitment to have our young men and women patrolling Iraq's streets open-endedly'' and that ``progress in
reconciliation will be an important element of our evaluation''.
(12) The President's January 10, 2007, address had three components: political, military, and economic. Given that
significant time has passed since his statement, and recognizing the overall situation is ever changing, Congress must have
timely reports to evaluate and execute its constitutional oversight responsibilities.

(b) Conditioning of Future United States Strategy in Iraq on the Iraqi Government's Record of Performance on Its Benchmarks.--
(1) In general.--

[[Page 121 STAT. 123]]

(A) The United States strategy in Iraq, hereafter, shall be conditioned on the Iraqi government meeting
benchmarks, as told to members of Congress by the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of
Defense, and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and reflected in the Iraqi Government's commitments to
the United States, and to the international community, including:
(i) Forming a Constitutional Review Committee and then completing the constitutional review.

(ii) Enacting and implementing legislation on de-Baathification.

(iii) Enacting and implementing legislation to ensure the equitable distribution of hydrocarbon resources of the people of Iraq without regard to the sect or ethnicity of recipients, and enacting and implementing legislation to ensure that the energy resources of Iraq benefit Sunni Arabs, Shia Arabs, Kurds, and other Iraqi citizens in an equitable manner.

(iv) Enacting and implementing legislation on procedures to form semi-autonomous regions.

(v) Enacting and implementing legislation establishing an Independent High Electoral Commission, provincial elections law, provincial council authorities, and a date for provincial elections.

(vi) Enacting and implementing legislation addressing amnesty.

(vii) Enacting and implementing legislation establishing a strong militia disarmament program to ensure that such security forces are accountable only to the central government and loyal to the Constitution of Iraq.

(viii) Establishing supporting political, media, economic, and services committees in support of the Baghdad Security Plan.

(ix) Providing three trained and ready Iraqi brigades to support Baghdad operations.

(x) Providing Iraqi commanders with all authorities to execute this plan and to make tactical and operational decisions, in consultation with U.S commanders, without political intervention, to include the authority to pursue all extremists, including Sunni insurgents and Shiite militias.

(xi) Ensuring that the Iraqi Security Forces are providing even handed enforcement of the law.

(xii) Ensuring that, according to President Bush, Prime Minister Maliki said ``the Baghdad security plan will not provide a safe haven for any outlaws, regardless of [their] sectarian or political affiliation''.

(xiii) Reducing the level of sectarian violence in Iraq and eliminating militia control of local security.

(xiv) Establishing all of the planned joint security stations in neighborhoods across Baghdad.

(xv) Increasing the number of Iraqi security forces units capable of operating independently.

(xvi) Ensuring that the rights of minority political parties in the Iraqi legislature are protected.

[[Page 121 STAT. 124]]

(xvii) Allocating and spending $10 billion in Iraqi revenues for reconstruction projects, including delivery of essential services, on an equitable basis.

(xviii) Ensuring that Iraq's political authorities are not undermining or making false accusations against members of the Iraqi Security Forces.


Do you need someone to convert the Roman Numerals for you too?




< Message edited by farglebargle -- 12/31/2007 1:36:54 AM >


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 9:57:44 AM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
lol... Put stubby away and wipe the drool from your mouth, fargle. This isn't kindergarten where you can expect a gold star and a pat on the head for giving an answer.

Goodness... only you would consider providing a link that was politely requested as some kind of triumphant victory. You'd think it was something new for you to be able to do so.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 10:21:09 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
LOL, tweaking noses, but not sharing in the idea that it is not your exclusive milieu.

I would fain laugh beyond the ability of my sides.

Ron

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to TreasureKY)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 10:28:37 AM   
Leonardo


Posts: 113
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
I guess they never included bride and me in the poll. Maybe because we're yellow dog democrats?

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 10:52:51 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: TreasureKY
Goodness... only you would consider providing a link that was politely requested as some kind of triumphant victory. You'd think it was something new for you to be able to do so.


Come off of it. Stop defending a scoundrel.

The citation was only requested as a way of implying that I fabricated or exaggerated my claim, and throwing my reputation and credibility into question. If FHKY gave a shit about the facts in the matter, he should have DONE HIS OWN FUCKING RESEARCH INTO THE CLAIM ***BEFORE*** questioning my honor. Then he wouldn't look like such a moron, given the ease and availability of the information support my claim.

I resent the implication that I am either dishonest or lack integrity, and will defend myself against any and all claims.

It's not the first time, when on the losing side, without the balls to just admit they're wrong, someone has tried to deflect criticism, by insulting the honor and integrity of the prevailing party in the dispute. The tactic is as transparent as it is laughable.

Laughable. As is the attempted defense of any such acts.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to TreasureKY)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 11:02:41 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

I resent the implication that I am either dishonest or lack integrity, and will defend myself against any and all claims.



Some people do this because they hope it will make you upset enough not to keep your wits. It is a way to pick someone's scabs until you upset them enough that they strike back... the best way to deal with such tactics is to log them, ignore them, and when appropriate remind them of their past words and hypocrisies...

Otherwise they can sit back and claim some moral high ground that they have no claim to... although those of us watching from the sidelines get endless amounts of amusement from the sturm and drang that they protest their "innocence" with... truly amusing

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 1:09:13 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Yet if anyone wants to read all of the section (1314) Farg is snipping from, you see the real problem.  Farg is right the benchmarks are set in public law.  Farg is making up his own version of what the penalty for not getting good marks at the Sept 15th date is.  The Democrats did tie help for Katrina victims to Bush and his Generals, Sec State, ect coming before Congress to give reports.  Making people wait for help to push an unrelated goal seems kind of lame, but thats what Democrats do. 

Directly after Farg chooses to end his snip quote of a law, it continues on to lay out what happens if progress is not made on the benchmarks (which if you take note are not exclusivly Fargs cited list.  They include Fargs cited list).  Funds can be cut off for Iraqi Recovery in the "Economic Support Fund", unless Bush gives himslef a waiver and gives a report with a classified Annex.

c) Limitations on Availability of Funds.--
           (1) <<NOTE: President. Certification.>>  Limitation.--No
       funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the
       ``Economic Support Fund'' and available for Iraq may be
       obligated or expended unless and until the President of the
       United States certifies in the report outlined in subsection
       (b)(2)(A) and makes a further certification in the report
       outlined in subsection (b)(2)(D) that Iraq is making progress on
       each of the benchmarks set forth in subsection (b)(1)(A).

[[Page 121 STAT. 125]]

           (2) Waiver authority.--The <<NOTE: Certification.>> 
       President may waive the requirements of this section if he
       submits to Congress a written certification setting forth a
       detailed justification for the waiver, which shall include a
       detailed report describing the actions being taken by the United
       States to bring the Iraqi government into compliance with the
       benchmarks set forth in subsection (b)(1)(A). The certification
       shall be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a
       classified annex.

   (d) <<NOTE: President.>>  Redeployment of U.S. Forces From Iraq.--
The President of the United States, in respecting the sovereign rights
of the nation of Iraq, shall direct the orderly redeployment of elements
of U.S. forces from Iraq, if the components of the Iraqi government,
acting in strict accordance with their respective powers given by the
Iraqi Constitution, reach a consensus as recited in a resolution,
directing a redeployment of U.S. forces.

It does continue on for a few more paragraphs about creating a NGO group to make assements, and declaring that if the Iraqi Government asks us to leave via a resolution, we will immediatly.

What exactly is your delusion regarding this farg?  That since a failing grade was recieved 3 months ago Bush should be jailed for violating the benchmarks?  The penalty for not passing all the stated benchmarks is clearly stated in the law, there is none.

The entire law was set up for pure political reasons.  It has no meaning at all, Bush is given the power to grant himself waivers.  But they tied up Katrina relief to get Bush and Petronius on Camera being scolded to make TV ads....But it does make People like Farg happy, and that is certainly worth holding up aid for Katrina Victims.

Honestly, your best bet is to convince the People of Iraq to ask us to leave, this law requires immediate retreat if that happens.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 2:24:44 PM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

The citation was only requested as a way of implying that I fabricated or exaggerated my claim, and throwing my reputation and credibility into question. If FHKY gave a shit about the facts in the matter, he should have DONE HIS OWN FUCKING RESEARCH INTO THE CLAIM ***BEFORE*** questioning my honor. Then he wouldn't look like such a moron, given the ease and availability of the information support my claim.


I don't know how you do things, fargle, but I don't typically rely on others to work to support my claims. 

However I wouldn't worry too much if I were you; despite any perceived aspersions cast, I suspect your reputation with regard to being a fair, well-reasoned and stable poster remains unsullied. 



(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 3:10:41 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
Thanks Lucky,

That covers the core of it, although, as a "Constitutional scholar" of repute within his own mind, I had some other questions for fargle, some of them which you covered:

1.  What was the President required to do - exactly - if Iraq failed to meet any or all of the "benchmarks"?
2.  When does/did the Public Law expire?
3.  In the Constitution, which branch has responsibility for the Armed Forces?
4.  Which part of the Constitution or Federal Law gives Congress the authority to plan and execute military operations?

Some more, but that's more than enough for now.

Firm

PS. I was amazed, and found it very funny that FB went on such a rant for a simple question about sources. There is a saying from Shakespeare, about too much protesting that I think may be applicable.


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 3:49:09 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
You have to realise Firm, this is probably the closest Farg has ever come to being able to back up one of his claims with a real source.  It seems to have really excited him.  He forced to you eat his load as his bitch or something in his view.  When in reality he made claims that he could only back up by editing a pulbic law, and posting a snippet.  Thats a win in his book, I suppose...

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 3:55:42 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Yet if anyone wants to read all of the section (1314) Farg is snipping from, you see the real problem.  Farg is right the benchmarks are set in public law.  Farg is making up his own version of what the penalty for not getting good marks at the Sept 15th date is. 


WHERE did I ever suggest any penalties for non-compliance with the objective criteria established under US Law? Your entire rant seems predicated on something I've never said.

quote:


What exactly is your delusion regarding this farg?


I have no delusions about the clear failure of Bush's Strategy.

For some reason YOU have assumed I've discussed penalties here, and launched into some rant based on that.




_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 4:04:06 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Thanks Lucky,

That covers the core of it, although, as a "Constitutional scholar" of repute within his own mind, I had some other questions for fargle, some of them which you covered:

1.  What was the President required to do - exactly - if Iraq failed to meet any or all of the "benchmarks"?


That is IRRELEVANT, as I've never suggested anything regarding the penalties for non-compliance, and have only answered the CLEAR DIRECT QUESTION you've been evading since Sinergy asked you, "How's that Surge you've promoted and supported coming along?"

The Surge Failed. Period.

Now, if you'd like to CHANGE THE SUBJECT AGAIN, to avoid admitting your failure to properly analyze the situation, and avoid explaining to us all, since you FUCKED UP supporting the surge, why should we trust your analysis until you've proven to us that you understand YOUR FAILURE.

quote:


2.  When does/did the Public Law expire?


It's irrelevant to the discussion of your failure to properly analyze the Surge, and it's effects.

If you didn't know what the LEGAL CRITERIA were, why should anyone believe you have ANY competence in the subject at hand?

I do understand your attempts to distract from the clear conclusion that you fucked up supporting the Surge; The Surge Failed; and you're not mature enough to admit your mistakes.

I would otherwise suggest that you could READ THE LAW, and learn the answers to your questions.

quote:


3.  In the Constitution, which branch has responsibility for the Armed Forces?


Again, this is irrelevant to discussing your lack of credibility given your failure to properly assess the effect PRIOR to the Surge, AND your failure to even understand the topic enough to know the applicable law.

quote:


4.  Which part of the Constitution or Federal Law gives Congress the authority to plan and execute military operations?


Squirm, Squirm, Squirm.

Everything to avoid the real question, asked so long ago:

"SINCE YOU FUCKED UP SUPPORTING AND ASSESSING THE SURGE, WHY SHOULD *ANYONE* GIVE CREDIBILITY TO *ANYTHING* YOU SAY, UNTIL AND UNLESS YOU CONVINCE US YOU'VE LEARNED FROM YOUR ERROR?"



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 4:07:46 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

You have to realise Firm, this is probably the closest Farg has ever come to being able to back up one of his claims with a real source.  It seems to have really excited him.  He forced to you eat his load as his bitch or something in his view.  When in reality he made claims that he could only back up by editing a pulbic law, and posting a snippet.  Thats a win in his book, I suppose...


You're full of Shit.

My Claim was "The Surge Failed"

I didn't need to, as you suggest, "editing a pulbic[sic] law". The Failure is clear, given the benchmarks set in US Law.

That is the beginning of my Claims.

For some reason you believe that, and I welcome you providing a citation to support it, I've made some broader statement about the Law.

You are, of course, incorrect.

The END of my Claims, is: "Since you fucked up, FHKY, In assessing the surge BEFORE it happened, and you're so IGNORANT of the issue that you don't even know the controlling Law, why should anyone give credibility to anything you say?"

So, I guess perhaps, YOU supported the Surge, too?

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 4:50:42 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
"SINCE YOU FUCKED UP SUPPORTING AND ASSESSING THE SURGE, WHY SHOULD *ANYONE* GIVE CREDIBILITY TO *ANYTHING* YOU SAY, UNTIL AND UNLESS YOU CONVINCE US YOU'VE LEARNED FROM YOUR ERROR?"

Whom exactly is the "us" you refer to in your shouting?

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 4:52:17 PM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Right Farg you conclude it was a failure, the Democrats in congress disagree with you, and funded more operations there.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush - 12/31/2007 4:53:46 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

"SINCE YOU FUCKED UP SUPPORTING AND ASSESSING THE SURGE, WHY SHOULD *ANYONE* GIVE CREDIBILITY TO *ANYTHING* YOU SAY, UNTIL AND UNLESS YOU CONVINCE US YOU'VE LEARNED FROM YOUR ERROR?"

Whom exactly is the "us" you refer to in your shouting?


Well, if you've been following the thread, the context would clearly be Sinergy and I. You could probably include juliaoceania, too.

However, I would think that all rational people would discount the analysis of someone who was so demonstrably wrong, but cannot and has not admitted his failure.

quote:


you conclude it was a failure


It's the conclusion of the Govenment Accountability Office, also.

Why do you keep bringing up these irrelevancies? The issue-at-hand is quite simple.

FHKY fucked up analyzing the Surge, and is so woefully ignorant of the topic, he's unaware of the controlling law.

For whatever reason refuses or is unable to admit it, and he just kept digging himself in deeper and deeper.

< Message edited by farglebargle -- 12/31/2007 4:59:08 PM >


_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Most Admired Man in World 2007: GW Bush Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094