RE: Can Bush do this? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


Sanity -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:00:20 PM)

You know, the nice moderator lady told us to take this to email a long time ago, farg. Maybe we should follow her advice at this point...

Send me an email and I'll reply by telling you again that I'm not interested in meeting you.


quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

On a reality TV show I might, sure. If they knew what they were doing. But you're some stranger I met on the Internet, who wants to tie me up...


So, let's discuss the conditions under which you WILL stand up, and support your allegation of waterboarding NOT being torture.

WHO, WHERE and HOW. What are your ideas?




luckydog1 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:04:09 PM)

"the alleged offender is a national of the United States;" means the people WORKING at Gitmo, doing the torture. Not the prisoner.

The prisoner isn't the "alleged offender" here, the prisoner is the VICTIM of the "alleged offender".

< Message edited by farglebargle -- 1/2/2008 5:50:11 PM >
 
Damn!!!  I misread it, and posted in error.  I like my crow roasted with Garlic.  I have to eat seconds on this one, it wasn't even a small mistake....
 
 




FirmhandKY -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:07:11 PM)

Hey .... you admit it when you make a mistake ....

That makes you one of a very small minority here on the CM forums!  [:D]

Firm




Owner59 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:07:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Well first off owner59, Yes, if that was the only way to save lives, I would blow the guy.  If you make up some silly scenario where I have to take it up the ass, I guess I would do that if needed.  Now you can snicker and say I am Gay or something.....

Man, my open question must have really hit a nerve on you.  Not only were you scared to actually answer it, you went off throwing up distractions. 

Now how about a serious answer to what I asked. 

If there were a natural disaster, and a couple of large Democratic states physically could not vote, would you want to delay the election or hold it right away garunteeing a Republican victory?


An honest man.Thanks Luckydog.

Lives before politics,would be the way I would swing,given a choice.

I wish more republicans, felt the same way.

I`ve already said I would vote for Dr.Ron Paul,if he gets the nod.
We`ll see though.I know alot of liberals who feel that way.




luckydog1 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:09:57 PM)

Lives before Politics means you would want to delay the elections? 




farglebargle -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:10:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Again, I ask you, what is your experience in the legal field on the subject under discussion that makes your opinion more correct than the lawyers who have reviewed the technique and who say it passes legal muster?


I am fully capable of reading. What else is relevant to the interpretation of Law?

And exactly who are these lawyers of whom you speak?

You can read, and nothing else is relevant?  Hmm, I can tell you've never had any actual experience with the law then.

Tell me this then ... why would you take the opinion of a doctor, over your own, on the diagnosis of an uncommon illness? (Or would you?)



If it was a medical diagnosis I'd have SEVERAL DOCTORS opinions, and then make my own call based on them.

Who are these lawyers of whom you speak? I've asked that, now twice...

quote:


You have made the claim that waterboarding is effective in getting the compliance of people that it is used on, have you not?



No I didn't.

CLOSEST you could come to that would be my assertion that waterboarding is effective in getting victims to tell torturers what the victim thinks the torturers want to hear to terminate the torture session.





luckydog1 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:11:44 PM)

Firm, it happens so rarely, I don't mind at all.....I don't have to defensive about the size of my cock either....




Owner59 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:12:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: oreogirl

Does anyone have a foil hat?


Foil hat??

We are using titanium beanies and underoos around here.


And they`re working quite well.Ha-ha.




FirmhandKY -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:14:57 PM)

FR:

I've just received my "final warning" so I'll be signing off for the nonce.

Good luck to you all in your individual struggle! [:)]

Firm




luckydog1 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:28:55 PM)

owner59?  I never got that clarification...Does "Lives before Politics" mean you would want to delay the election or not? 




dcnovice -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:35:41 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Hey .... you admit it when you make a mistake ....

That makes you one of a very small minority here on the CM forums!  [:D]

Firm



Indeed. Kudos to Lucky from across the aisle.




Owner59 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:47:33 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NavyDDG54

For everyone here. The President has the authority to suspend the geneva convention therefore making it legal for him to order torture.
The people we have in Guantanamo are not nice people. They are little more than animals. The terrorists being held there are the ones directly responsible for (intentionially) killing innocent civilians. And many of them have information vital to saving American lives.

Hypothetical question...if we knew for a fact that one of those terrorsits had info on a nuke in the US would you oppose using torture to get that info and stop that nuke?

The liberals criticize Bush for not doing enough to stop 9-11, maybe if we had tortured the terrorists prior to 9-11 we would have been able to stop it.

As for Iraq, we are WINNING. You want to support us (I say us because I am in the military and have been to Iraq). Send us care packages (phonecards, letters, snacks, batteries, etc...). We are determined the finish this war with a victory. It's taken a long time yes (4 1/2 years in Iraq) but no longer than WWII. with significantly less US casualties.

For those of you who think that Bush started the war you are wrong. The terrorists have been at war with us for decades:

1979: Iran Hostage crisis
April 1983: 17 dead at the U.S. embassy in Beirut.
October 1983: 241 dead at the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut.
December 1983: five dead at the U.S. embassy in Kuwait.
January 1984: the president of the American University of Beirut killed.
April 1984: 18 dead near a U.S. airbase in Spain.
September 1984: 16 dead at the U.S. embassy in Beirut (again).
December 1984: Two dead on a plane hijacked to Tehran.
June 1985: One dead on a plane hijacked to Beirut.
After a let-up, the attacks then restarted: Five and 19 dead in Saudi Arabia in 1995 and 1996, 224 dead at the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998 and 17 dead on the USS Cole in Yemen in October 2000.
Simultaneously, the murderous assault of militant Islam also took place on U.S. soil:
July 1980: an Iranian dissident killed in the Washington, D.C. area.
August 1983: a leader of the Ahmadiyya sect of Islam killed in Canton, Mich.
August 1984: three Indians killed in a suburb of Tacoma, Wash.
September 1986: a doctor killed in Augusta, Ga.
January 1990: an Egyptian freethinker killed in Tucson, Ariz.
November 1990: a Jewish leader killed in New York.
February 1991: an Egyptian Islamist killed in New York.
January 1993: two CIA staff killed outside agency headquarters in Langley, Va.
February 1993: Six people killed at the World Trade Center.
March 1994: an Orthodox Jewish boy killed on the Brooklyn Bridge.
February 1997: a Danish tourist killed on the Empire State building.
October 1999: 217 passengers killed on an EgyptAir flight near New York City."

Others in 1999:
-Ahmed Ressam is arrested on the United StatesCanada border in Port Angeles, Washington; he confessed to planning to bomb the Los Angeles International Airport as part of the 2000 millennium attack plots

2000:
-The last of the 2000 millennium attack plots fails, as the boat meant to bomb USS The Sullivans sinks.
- USS Cole bombing kills 17 US sailors and wounds 40 off the port coast of Aden, Yemen, by al-Qaeda

2001:
-9-11



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDABe8AOuCQ

Just to bring the kid up to speed, Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with anything you posted,nothing.

We went into Iraq,for nothing.

I got a question for ya kid.You seem to be full-o-facts.

Why did the Bush administration close the bin-laden unit?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13699308/

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/04/terror/main1774331.shtml

Btw,it was bin laden,who was behind 9/11,and a good chunk of the things you posted.

You let us hash this out,and let the will of the people and the democratic process decide what wars we fight.

Thanks for your military service.




dcnovice -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:55:52 PM)

Owner: Navy is 22 and old enough to serve his country. Why are you calling him "kid"?




Owner59 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:55:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Lives before Politics means you would want to delay the elections? 


If it saved lives,yes.Of course.

I would hope you felt the same way,if it were in reverse.




Owner59 -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 6:57:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

Owner: Navy is 22 and old enough to serve his country. Why are you calling him "kid"?


just tease`n him....

When you`re push`n 50,they all start look`n like kids.




Daddysredhead -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 7:13:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: dcnovice

Owner: Navy is 22 and old enough to serve his country. Why are you calling him "kid"?


"kid" = animal play?  (goats, yanno...)  Just wonderin'...  [8|]




TheHeretic -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 7:14:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ligar59

I was told that Pres Bush could declare Marshall law, which would suspend the elections indefinitely, thus allowing him to remain in office until he decided the "war" was over

Tell me that is not possible


      Just got to this thread.  Looks like it got interesting.

      Yes, Ligar, it is theoretically possible.  What you would get would be the entire conservative establishment turning on him.  Et tu, Karl?, kind of turning on him.  His Secret Service guy handing him a .45 with one round in it, kind of turning on him.




Daddysredhead -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 7:15:23 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

constantly editing your posts.



Free country?  [8|]

(dunno, maybe the wrong thread for all this politicing)  [;)]




TheHeretic -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 7:17:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

When you`re push`n 50,they all start look`n like kids.



       And when you are pushing 50, the fine young MEN who serve our country figure you are just a bitter old man.




OrionTheWolf -> RE: Can Bush do this? (1/2/2008 8:26:58 PM)

Because this question fits so well:

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Why is this childish stupidity,being inserted into the conversation?



quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Reposted,b/c this thread fits so well....

Much has been said by the brave-heart, torture proponents.We`ve all heard the loaded question,"If you had a terrorist in custody,who had info about a bomb that would kill thousands,would you use torture to extract that vital info,in order to intervein and save American lives?

The question is unfair,because what other answer to a question like, could you give?Of course someone would say yes.

I have a question for the brave heroes, who say we need to torture people, in order to keep us safe.

We all know that these terrorists are the most religiously brainwashed and devoted nuts on earth.They beleive the whole thing,there`s no  atheists, in their ranks.They believe that being martyred, is a "get in heaven guaranteed card".They believe that each and every one of them, will somehow be presented with 72 virgins when they arrive in heaven,lol,plus a whole lot of other nonsense.The point is,the terrorists/jihadists believe this,to the point of death.They don`t get more crazy or committed,then that.

However,they believe that if they do anything homosexual,they won`t go to heaven.No datenut bread with hot tea, served by the 72 virgins,no de-flowering of the 72,or any of the other heavenly blessings.If they go gay,they get zilch.Doesn`t matter if it`s a fairy tail,the terrorist believe that shit,and it can be used against them.

The question now:

If there was a ticking time bomb,and you had the actual terrorist who planted it,in your hands,would you do homosexual acts on him,to make him talk.All you need to do is pull his pants down while he`s bound,and give him head,and he`ll give up the goods,because,to a Muslim,nothing`s worse then going the hell.

Would you brave ,heroic ,straight guys step up and suck cock for your country,if you knew it would save lives?

Luckydog,Sanity,Fatdomdaddy,etc.,we know you`re torture crazed,with Jack Bauer/24 fantasies of saving the day and all.If you knew that sucking and licking the junk of a terrorist would save thousands of Americans,would you suck and lick?

C`on tough guys,what would you do?




Page: <<   < prev  8 9 [10] 11 12   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
4.699707E-02