Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination - 1/1/2008 10:55:55 PM   
hardbodysub


Posts: 1654
Joined: 8/7/2005
Status: offline
Most of the responses here have been right on target. I'm pleasantly surprised by that, actually. The OP point of view is BS.

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination - 1/1/2008 11:05:12 PM   
AllietheKitten


Posts: 115
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
I also think that the "traditional versus contemporary" separation is a false dichotomy. So much of the "lifestyle" has been underground until recently. Categorizing it is like categorizing gay culture of the 1800's. Did it exist? It had to have. But only the most outrageous and (alternately) innocuous examples survive today. So how do we really know what "traditional" BDSM was before the wider dissemination in the past two decades or so? All we have is the opinions of a few pockets of people in clubs in New York and California...not exactly a representative sample of humanity.

In other words, just because a vocal minority were known to have existed before the internet doesn't make them the majority, or the torchbearers or authorities-anymore than rent boys in London brothels were representative of gay culture of the 1800's. Just because its all we have doesn't mean its all there *is*.

_____________________________

I don't believe in Destiny
Or the guiding hand of Fate
I don't believe in forever
of love as a mystical state
But I believe there's a ghost of a chance
We can find someone to love and make it last.
~Rush

(in reply to hardbodysub)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination - 1/1/2008 11:11:01 PM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
My slavery is defined by my Master allowing me to be true to myself, and by the rules he put forth for me and for our relationship.  Those are the only rules I am interested in.

Your scenarios don't relate to me in the least.  Betty Paige?  Conan?  "I've got a whip...let's have at it"?  Swingers?  Old School?

I don't care how leatherists see my kind of submission.  I have no interest in participating in a contest, or participating in "lifestyle" events, or of following any set of rules but the ones already set for me by a man who knows the inner workings of my mind, body and emotional make up.  I can't imagine how a community would know what's better for me than him.

He is a true Master in my eyes and I am a true slave in his eyes and that's what matters to us.  "True" means as we define such labels to be.  That means anyone whose views are much different than that would not be compatible with us.  That doesn't mean I don't respect what other people do.  It also means I don't care of others disagree with what we do.

While it's good to have discussions so we can learn from each other, the idea of "community rules", while silly to me, does not apply to me.  I suppose if it interested enough people, they would form a group with their own set of agreed upon rules and be content with that.

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 10:46:53 AM   
LotusSong


Posts: 6334
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Domme Emeritus
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catize

I believe, at least on forums such as this, many use the word ‘true’ to mean what they do is the only way to do it. 
 
I wouldn’t care what a Leather Society felt about MY D/s relationships any more than I would care what a local church (or forum church lady) thinks about MY morals.
If my submission pleases the dominants in my life, that is what is important to me. 
I live my life with a moral code that makes my actions accountable  to myself and to the dominants in my life.  I am not accountable to any institutional morality clause. 
Rules?  Whose rules matter other than the men I choose to submit to? 
Whether others regard what I may do as ‘just kinky, D/s or M/s’  I don’t see how that affects anything that those others may do.
I’ve asked this before and not received any profound answers:  If I play a game of flag football in my backyard, does that demean or negatively affect the NFL?

Edited to add:  MadRabbit said it much better.  And to fix a typo.


Do you not think those that wish to be a member of a specific group representative of the group?
I see no reason to reinvent the wheel.  If you can hang with the program fine..if not, you must be in the wrong place.
 
I find the young'uns (20's-30's) fight structure more than the older ones.. I know..I was young once and I made a fool of myself back then just like kids do today.  The cries are "You are all just close minded!  I'm just doing it differently!.. and the "YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!"
 
I feel where this comes from is the coming of age where we feel we need to make a mark on something..ANYTHING! And the more outlandish the better.  Ok.., we see you..we hear you..because we've been there.  We've also learned that at times a person just doesn't fit into a situation.  But saying THEY'RE wrong to justify themselves is also a crock.
 
Face it.. we have stolen and bastardized this "lifestyle" from the gay male community  .. it was theirs to begin with.
 
Live it as you will.. but call it something else.. because what it has become is one big joke. 
 
Thank god for TNG :)  They took the initiative and created their own situation.  While they thought the older group was blocking them out..they understood the situation. They didn't keep going to the older groups and crying that there wasn't anything there for them.  They saw a need for their own and filled it.
 
You will never understand this situation until time has passed and you look back on it all.  Try not to be TOO embarrassed :)  It happens to us all.

_____________________________

Life Lesson #1

I'm not your type.
I'm not inflatable.


(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 10:55:21 AM   
ownedgirlie


Posts: 9184
Joined: 2/5/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

Face it.. we have stolen and bastardized this "lifestyle" from the gay male community  .. it was theirs to begin with.
 


The way I live my life has nothing to do with what another group of people did, nor did it "belong" to anyone else.  Before I even knew there was a "lifestyle", I was this way.  I just thought something was wrong with me.  Only when I found like minds was I able to relax a little and start to embrace who and what I am.

I think your premise is wrong.

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 10:57:57 AM   
RCdc


Posts: 8674
Status: offline
So then - define the 'program' - and if you can I would be incredibly surprised.
The wheel is 're-invented' all the time - new tyres, new shapes, sizes.  Some wheels aren't even round anymore - how cool is that?
What you are supporting is convention. Not rules and structure.  Not traditional or contemporary, but convention.
 
the.dark.


< Message edited by Darcyandthedark -- 1/2/2008 10:59:09 AM >


_____________________________


RC&dc


love isnt gazing into each others eyes - it's looking forward in the same direction

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination - 1/2/2008 10:58:02 AM   
kitttty


Posts: 494
Joined: 10/10/2007
Status: offline
There are no rules besides those imposed by the law (and thank goodness for those).

But despite a lack of rules, standards and formal hierarchies of best to worst, some people will simply be desired by more people than others. Some people might be desired more strongly than someone else is desired by anyone.

It's not really a rule- that's just how the chips fall.

(in reply to AllietheKitten)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:03:22 AM   
kitttty


Posts: 494
Joined: 10/10/2007
Status: offline
quote:

Women seek Conan the Barbarian (intelligence optional) types.


Not me. Evil genius is my kink.

But I'd be quite surprised if it is not easier for a tall man to find a sub online.

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:04:39 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
I have a hard enough time following rules when I am paid to do so. Any standardized list of rules or regulations in this "lifestyle" is doomed to failure. And yes that IS a sweeping generalization and I feel quite comfortable making it

Jeff

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:13:06 AM   
BruisedHick


Posts: 123
Joined: 8/11/2007
Status: offline
This lifestyle can be divided into two types:  Those who follow rules set by others and those who don't.

In life, you have similar things:  Religion imposes rules on spirituality, Weight watchers vs. eating healthy, even people who insist on playing Scrabble based on Tournament rules instead of the ones printed in the box or house rules.

Some people need the validation of others, others do whatever they feel is good.  Either one can succeed or fail, and neither is better than the other in all categories.

If you want to feel like you are part of a bigger thing, join a bigger thing.  But accept that many do not, and leave them be.  I don't need a lineup at my door of kinky folks looking to recruit me to their God.

Yours,


benji

_____________________________

Guess who?

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:15:59 AM   
LotusSong


Posts: 6334
Joined: 7/2/2006
From: Domme Emeritus
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I have a hard enough time following rules when I am paid to do so. Any standardized list of rules or regulations in this "lifestyle" is doomed to failure. And yes that IS a sweeping generalization and I feel quite comfortable making it

Jeff


.. and the lack of rules and structure is what is killing it now.  When the public can't recognize play from violence... who's to blame?  The ambiguity of it all for fear of being "made wrong" is the real BS.



_____________________________

Life Lesson #1

I'm not your type.
I'm not inflatable.


(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:16:23 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong


Do you not think those that wish to be a member of a specific group representative of the group?
I see no reason to reinvent the wheel. If you can hang with the program fine..if not, you must be in the wrong place.

I find the young'uns (20's-30's) fight structure more than the older ones.. I know..I was young once and I made a fool of myself back then just like kids do today. The cries are "You are all just close minded! I'm just doing it differently!.. and the "YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!"

I feel where this comes from is the coming of age where we feel we need to make a mark on something..ANYTHING! And the more outlandish the better. Ok.., we see you..we hear you..because we've been there. We've also learned that at times a person just doesn't fit into a situation. But saying THEY'RE wrong to justify themselves is also a crock.

Face it.. we have stolen and bastardized this "lifestyle" from the gay male community .. it was theirs to begin with.

Live it as you will.. but call it something else.. because what it has become is one big joke.

Thank god for TNG :) They took the initiative and created their own situation. While they thought the older group was blocking them out..they understood the situation. They didn't keep going to the older groups and crying that there wasn't anything there for them. They saw a need for their own and filled it.

You will never understand this situation until time has passed and you look back on it all. Try not to be TOO embarrassed :) It happens to us all.


Except the "gay male community" was a lot of small groups with their own rules and rituals. Some overlap as they intermingled over time but still small groups.

Anyway, the thread and this post above got me thinking more... are you ready to run for cover yet?

Small groups exist everywhere from a local munch to a local branch of the NLA -- the variety of rules and rituals varies though branches of larger organizations tend to have standard constitutions and guidelines.

As people dislike one group they either complain or they found new groups.

I can like being a member of a community if it fits with my own code of conduct. If is doesn't I can either change or leave but I don't personally think I have "right" to try to make trouble for that group.

I really dislike two types of people who join groups. Those who complain and undermine the group itself and those who are looking for someone else's rules and rituals to follow sometimes as though it were the one true religion.

*shudder*

So basically I'm saying the same thing. Join a group if you can agree with the dynamics there or don't but please if you can't live with their guidelines, don't claim membership because you will be seen as representing that group whether or like it or not, whether it's fair or not.

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:22:20 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
I grew up on Fire Island. I knew Old Guard leathermen from back before Stonewall. I can assure you that none of them made twenty years with the same master/slave. Most of them didn't make one season.

What that says to me is that Old Guard isn't a way to live if what you want is a long lasting relationship.

The rules required are the same as in any relationship. The ability to articulate what you need, the willingness to listen to your partner, the maturity not to tear other people down because their needs are different, the willingness to do what is necessary for the relationship to work out and fulfill both partners' needs. Basic relationship skills that most people, kinky and vanilla, lack.

_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to AllietheKitten)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:25:07 AM   
Padriag


Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

Do you not think those that wish to be a member of a specific group representative of the group?
I see no reason to reinvent the wheel.  If you can hang with the program fine..if not, you must be in the wrong place.

I have no problem with a specific club or other organization, having some form of charter and some form of leadership and governance, establishing rules regarding membership.  Want to make it men only, women only, whites only, blacks only, etc.  I can understand and support a groups right to establish certain standards of membership, codes of behavior, etc.  I can even fully agree with their right to exclude anyone who doesn't fit their criteria, whatever that criteria may be.

And that's about as far as I can agree with what you wrote... 
 
quote:

I find the young'uns (20's-30's) fight structure more than the older ones.. I know..I was young once and I made a fool of myself back then just like kids do today.  The cries are "You are all just close minded!  I'm just doing it differently!.. and the "YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!"

Another wonderfully broad statement that will immediately draw lots of exceptions.  Some people actually are doing things differently and this may come as a surprise to you, but that's okay.  Just as I can support a club or organization to say,"This is how we do things, if you want to join our club you have to do it this way."  I equally support someone else's right to say,"Fuck off, I don't need your rules, and I might just start a club of my own."  But two things I don't support are a) someone trying to say they are part of a club when they aren't (that's just lying), or b) someone pretentiously assuming their club's rules can be applied to everyone, including non-members.

quote:

I feel where this comes from is the coming of age where we feel we need to make a mark on something..ANYTHING! And the more outlandish the better.  Ok.., we see you..we hear you..because we've been there.  We've also learned that at times a person just doesn't fit into a situation.  But saying THEY'RE wrong to justify themselves is also a crock.

You also might consider that that last sentence cuts two ways.

The surest way to corrupt a youth is to instruct him to hold in higher esteem those who think alike than those who think differently. -- Nietzsche

If a man does not keep pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer.  Let him step to the music which he hears, however measured or far away. -- Henry David Thoreau


quote:

Face it.. we have stolen and bastardized this "lifestyle" from the gay male community  .. it was theirs to begin with

Oh really, I was unaware they held the copyright or patent.  I wonder what the Marquis de Sade would think of that?  Or those brazen old Romen men... or the Greeks before them.  People have been doing kinky things to each other for probably about as long as there have been people.  How utterly arrogant of you to assume any one group has ownership of that.


quote:

Live it as you will.. but call it something else.. because what it has become is one big joke. 

Well that's your opinion, if it bothers you so much feel free to find your own path, march to your own drummer, form your own club, organization, secret society, public dungeon or whatever you feel inspired to do.  But if you think your little rant is going to change hearts and minds, you're in for a rude shock.  No one, not you, not I, not aging leathermen, not that naughty marquis, not even those libertine greeks has a right to claim ownership of a lifestyle.  You want to own a term for something, apply for a trademark.  Until such is granted its in the public domain and people can use it however they please.  
 
quote:

Thank god for TNG :)  They took the initiative and created their own situation.  While they thought the older group was blocking them out..they understood the situation. They didn't keep going to the older groups and crying that there wasn't anything there for them.  They saw a need for their own and filled it.
 

So now we come to it, what you really want is for all those who don't think, talk and act the way you think they should... which is to say they don't live up to your standards... you'd like them to be so kind as to call themselves something else, go somewhere else and stop intruding on your one true way fantasy.  My... how very inconsiderate of everyone else not to live the way you want.  You'll excuse me while I intrude a little reality, but life just doesn't work that way.  This "lifestyle" is made up of countless individuals with a myriad array of kinks, fetishes and interests, all pursuing their own personal goals in whatever way they think suits them best.  That there is much confusion amongst terminology used, just who is who and who wants what from whom... that I will not deny.  Such is life, and you'd better get used to it because I find it very unlikely the world is going to change all that just to suit you. 

quote:

You will never understand this situation until time has passed and you look back on it all.  Try not to be TOO embarrassed :)  It happens to us all.

That was an utterly snobbish, arrogant, condescending, patronizing thing to say to anyone.  But hey, at least you already seem to be familiar with doing embarassing things.

_____________________________

Padriag

A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:27:47 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

I have a hard enough time following rules when I am paid to do so. Any standardized list of rules or regulations in this "lifestyle" is doomed to failure. And yes that IS a sweeping generalization and I feel quite comfortable making it

Jeff


.. and the lack of rules and structure is what is killing it now.  When the public can't recognize play from violence... who's to blame?  The ambiguity of it all for fear of being "made wrong" is the real BS.




Yes but WHO determines what is violence? Is the red  rash of a flogger ok? are cane welts too far? and what a bout a hand print that lasts for a day or two? God forbid someone should get slapped in the face........unless of course they LIKE it.

Jeff

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:32:00 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I am a traditionalist, and dominate only in contemporary fashion.

Haute Couture Master

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:33:04 AM   
catize


Posts: 3020
Joined: 3/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Do you not think those that wish to be a member of a specific group representative of the group?
I see no reason to reinvent the wheel.  If you can hang with the program fine..if not, you must be in the wrong place.
 
I find the young'uns (20's-30's) fight structure more than the older ones.. I know..I was young once and I made a fool of myself back then just like kids do today.  The cries are "You are all just close minded!  I'm just doing it differently!.. and the "YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!"
 
I feel where this comes from is the coming of age where we feel we need to make a mark on something..ANYTHING! And the more outlandish the better.  Ok.., we see you..we hear you..because we've been there.  We've also learned that at times a person just doesn't fit into a situation.  But saying THEY'RE wrong to justify themselves is also a crock.
 
Face it.. we have stolen and bastardized this "lifestyle" from the gay male community  .. it was theirs to begin with.
 
Live it as you will.. but call it something else.. because what it has become is one big joke. 
 
Thank god for TNG :)  They took the initiative and created their own situation.  While they thought the older group was blocking them out..they understood the situation. They didn't keep going to the older groups and crying that there wasn't anything there for them.  They saw a need for their own and filled it.
 
You will never understand this situation until time has passed and you look back on it all.  Try not to be TOO embarrassed :)  It happens to us all.  


There are many and varied representations of BDSM, D/s and M/s.  My opinion on the subject is no less valid than anyone else’s.  There is no majority agreement on the ‘one true way’ so I see it that we all have the right to represent what is true for each of us, for each relationship.  I have no issue with the way you choose to live your life or the rules and expectations you set for your dynamic; I’m glad it works for you.  But I strongly object to the premise that other people, the ‘community at large’ should be allowed to tell me what rules I should live by.  Who gets to decide what is right for everyone else?  Not you, not the Leather community and not me.
I respect other’s way of life and expect the same in return. 
Every institution or group at some point changes the rules to keep relevant.  Many times the rules get changed because the ‘good ole days’ weren’t really all that good. 
 
Yes, it is most certainly a crock to say anyone who does it differently is wrong.  It is also a crock to say there is only one way to do it right.
 
I am puzzled because this is not the first time you have suggested that I am ‘too young’ to know what’s good for me.  I’ll be 55 years old in a few months.  Age really has nothing to do with the validity of an opinion.  I don’t believe that youth necessarily equates to stupidity, nor do I believe that age is a guarantee of wisdom.
 
I sincerely doubt that I will ever be embarrassed by my considered opinions.   I am always open to new points of view and I am willing to change my mind when presented with a rationale that makes sense to me.  This discussion is not one of those times.


_____________________________

"Power is real. But it's a lot less real if it's not perceived as power."
Robert Parker, Stranger in Paradise

(in reply to LotusSong)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:34:13 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

I am a traditionalist, and dominate only in contemporary fashion.

Haute Couture Master


When canes are outlawed....only outlaws will have canes

Charlton Heston

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:37:21 AM   
Padriag


Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: catize

I am puzzled because this is not the first time you have suggested that I am ‘too young’ to know what’s good for me.  I’ll be 55 years old in a few months.  Age really has nothing to do with the validity of an opinion.  I don’t believe that youth necessarily equates to stupidity, nor do I believe that age is a guarantee of wisdom.
 

ROFL... hell... take it as a sort of compliment!  .oO(Geez, all this egg is going to be a mess.)

_____________________________

Padriag

A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer

(in reply to catize)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Traditional vs Contemporary Domination - 1/2/2008 11:38:00 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
If it was easy, everybody'd be doing it.

E. F. Hutton

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Traditional vs Contemproary Domination Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094