Padriag
Posts: 2633
Joined: 3/30/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: whippedattitude iam curious to hear from the Masters what they feel their responsibilities to their sub/slaves/play partners are? That's a broad group... you're leaping from play partners to owned slaves and everything in between. I doubt very much there is a single answer applicable to such a large and diverse grouping. quote:
How much of it starts/ends with a session, and how much and to what levels does it carry over to every day life? What session? Are you only interested in the views of Tops who engage in play? What about dominants of various stripes involved in long term relationships? What about those for whom being dominant or submissive is a fundamental part of who they are... an aspect always present? quote:
Do you have different levels with different partners, based on the amount of interaction you have with them? Again, this sounds more like you are addressing Tops at play parties or public dungeons who have multiple and perhaps random partners. As such you may not find my perspective useful, as I don't believe I fit into the group you appear to be speaking too. However.... As a frame of reference I refer to myself as a "master", which simply means I seek a specific kind of relationship dynamic... one where I "own" a slave, one where I hold a great deal of authority over said slave, and one where I expect said slave to be useful to me. Consider the following in that frame of reference... though it might be interesting to consider it outside of it as well (just because I enjoy looking at things from different angles). My chief responsibility as a master is to seek and ensure that my needs are met, and that my desires are served. One means of this is by seeking out slaves to serve me; who through their service provide for some of my needs as well as some of my desires. On second thought... that's actually the whole of my responsibility. I'm not responsible for making her happy... either she's happy with the life she's chosen, and who she's with, or she isn't. I will be who I am, if she isn't happy with that, she knows where the door is. I'm not responsible for her security... I am responsible for mine. I'll see to it I have a future, that my future is as secure as I can make it, etc. She may, if that's her choice, try to ensure her own security by attaching herself to me. I'm not responsible for her health... I am responsible for mine. I'm not her personal trainer or dietician... I'm not her doctor or shrink... its not my job to be any of these things. I might be able to help her in some of these areas because it suits me to do so... but my effectiveness is limited by my ability... and I'm not a professional in any of these areas. If she feels she needs serious help in these areas, she should be relying on a professional, not an amateur such as myself. I am not responsible for making her a better person, or fulfilling her potential, or setting her "free" or giving her purpose. I will use her... I will utilize her as I see fit for my own gain, my own pleasure. If that makes her feel fulfilled, great. If serving me gives her a sense of purpose, terrific. If being around me, learning from me by exposure to me, helps her be a better person... wonderful. But its not my purpose to do any of those things. Harsh and unromantic I know... but I prefer it that way. YMMV
_____________________________
Padriag A stern discipline pervades all nature, which is a little cruel so that it may be very kind - Edmund Spencer
|