dcnovice
Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: camille65 Obama, projected winner. Can someone explain in teensy words to me, why such an archaic system such as the Iowa Caucus is the major turning point? Why is is blind with the Reps and up front seen with the Dems? Why do the Dems get to try and sway people when they've not the 15%? I do not get a single part of the procedure.According (to much earlier in the day) a CNN poll 71% did not understand it. It is nice to have company in my confusion. ~le sigh, caucus conundrum, completely confuzzled. You might enjoy Anna Quindlen's column, First Tuesday of Huh? Here's her take on the Iowa process: The official season kicks off with a rite so arcane that even many of those participating don't understand it. The Iowa caucuses are like evening coffee klatsches with a serving of trigonometry. Those who show up at one of the state's 1,784 precincts huddle in various corners of the room depending on whom they're supporting. Then the folks in each "preference group" are counted and the math begins: multiplying that number by the number of delegates allotted to a precinct, then dividing by the number attending the caucus. Or at least I think that's right. Even veterans admit confusion, and tutorials are routinely offered. Keep that in mind when you hear the deceptively straightforward news that a candidate won in Iowa.
< Message edited by dcnovice -- 1/3/2008 8:01:14 PM >
_____________________________
No matter how cynical you become, it's never enough to keep up. JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE
|