Rover
Posts: 2634
Joined: 6/28/2004 Status: offline
|
Admittedly, agreement on BDSM definitions are exceptionally elusive. Still, the difference between Top and Dominant enjoys more consensus than most (which is not to say that it's universal). quote:
ORIGINAL: Justme696 I love your French but Tops was not introduced by me. I'm sure you're right... it was your use of it that I happened to notice. quote:
But if you explain me why a Master/Dom is not a Top, then we can leave it out. Till then...i think there are 3 options. I believe I stated that rather clearly in my previous post. A Top may also be a Dominant, but not necessarily so. Just as a Top may also be a Catholic. But a Top does not have to be a Dominant, nor a Catholic. It's really not too difficult to grasp. It's related to the different aspects of BDSM. A Top can engage in B/D and S/M, but have no interest in D/S. In fact, that is a rather common occurance. Conversely, a Dominant can be interested in D/S without engaging in B/D and S/M. And although that is less common, it's hardly unheard of. quote:
As you said, they are not the same. So if they are not the same, why did you say that they are? John
_____________________________
"Man's mind stretched to a new idea never goes back to its original dimensions." Sri da Avabhas
|