Rule
Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Etch Circumcision is not necessarily an Islamic act. Quite, it is a Jewish act, practized by the enemies of Mohammed. If I recall correctly, it was commanded by the God of the Jews - not the incarnate Creator Allah - of Abraham to mutilate the penis of Isaac. quote:
ORIGINAL: Etch And I can't see how could it be related to heart. It apparently was a generalized correlation observed by St. Paul, who was well familiar with the Jews, being one himself. He apparently noticed, I deduce, that Jews (often) needed (to obey) the Law - which they often did not - in order to be good people, whereas the non-Jews did not require the Law, as they were mostly inherently good people. His argument in one of his texts against circumcision is pure genius. quote:
ORIGINAL: Etch Would it make a difference to you if you're talking to an uncircumsized Muslim?. I guess not. When interacting with individuals, generalizations may not apply. When discussing populations and population genetics and gene pools, generalizations to some degree do apply. There is a thread in these forums called "When did the USA become a Christian nation". In my opinion the question is not relevant. The question ought to be "When did the USA become a Jewish nation" and my answer is: "When they started to mutilate the penises of their male offspring." In a couple of generations I predict that the USA population will be inbreeding cousins with cousins, will have five to six times more congenital disease than in our times, and will stone adulterous women, or simply cut their throat, or drown them in a bucket, and will need the sharia to quell their own evil.
|