laurell3 -> RE: Do you care if your slave is a whore? (1/20/2008 12:45:46 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord quote:
ORIGINAL: hisannabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: CuriousLord quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 Every woman who would be my slave starts out as a virgin, regardless of how many kids she has or how many penises have penetrated her in the past. I sort of consider it that way with rapes. Sadly, a lot of girls I've known have been raped. Some of them, several times over a period of time by the same person. So those never count against a person. Not that.. it's attractive to consider, by any means, just.. it doesn't seem right to hold that against someone. wow, i do believe that might be one of the most naive and upsetting things i have heard on this subject, as a rape survivor (and a lot of people say a lot of naive and upsetting, however well meant, things about rape). because i was forcibly raped and beaten against my will, it's okay, but if i chose to do it with different people before i chose to do it with you, it's not okay? it just feels extremely patronizing, and while i can understand the intention, it's the most backward reasoning i've heard recently. if i'm a victim, i'm not damaged goods, but if i wanted it to happen, i am. (if i've experienced both, what does that make me? semi-acceptable? mediocre? /sarcastic musing.) As a rape victim, you find your rape not being considered as an instance of consenting to sexual intercourse offensive? Perhaps I'll explain, as you may be misunderstanding. I'm not interested in a girl that's easy, that gives her sexuality out quickly. Being raped doesn't mean that she gave out her sexuality.. it means it was taken.. which doesn't speak against the aspect of her character which would affect my sexual attraction towards her. This explained, is it still offensive? If so, how? Being raped may very well mean she acts out in that manner though CL and it's not uncommon. However, it's not a secret that CL is somewhat idealistic in what he seeks and has a rather naive viewpoint about life that is not always presented well. However, he's also not usually totally close-minded, self-righteous or cruel, just a bit different (we all are) so I would suggest that you guys accept that he's being honest about what he seeks and accept that you think differently. I do not believe he is attempting to be rude to rape victims, quite the contrary. He's saying if someone was raped he doesn't consider that against them when he looks at the number of people they have been with. Again in my not so humble opinion, it's idealistic even probably foolish to attach a specific number to a person, but it's his opinion. He's not criticising rape victims, he's just being CL. To the OP: I don't believe sexual partners means anything about a person or is paticularly relevant to current relationships as long as they can be monogamous if required. Everyone makes mistakes or goes through phases in life, people do different things. I'd be more concerned about other behaviors than sexual history personally. Throwing stones based on sexual history on a bdsm forum seems silly to me, and numbers are much less important than the person.
|
|
|
|