laurell3 -> RE: Is this common? (1/21/2008 11:18:18 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact Thanks to those who answered. Yes, the most ridiculous part of this was that, on the thread I pulled it from, not just one, but two seperate cases of subs who were going to be 'punished' for not finding a third. While I understand that some subs might assist in the search for a third for a poly situation, I can't see it being responsibility of someone besides the one who would wish to be the Dominant, and the one who was ultimately in charge of the dynamic. Sure, it's fantastic that the potential sister sub would want to be involved, but it's really more important that the Dominant and the secondary sub match. Edited because the whole 'punishment' for not finding a third is so far fetched to Me, I couldn't even type properly. This might be a better subject for another thread but honestly I have to wonder how many subs would consent to being a third without having more contact with the Dominant than the sub. While I would talk to the sub, her opinion is important and how she feels about it of course, I've been approached by subs who have been instructed the prospective sub cannot talk to the Dominant. How could that possibly be an acceptable approach to a prospective sub? The OP is obviously ridiculous. Something that takes time and should not be rushed is an assignment to get done in a short amount of time? The numbers out there of submissives willing to engage in poly with a couple isn't all that high to begin with. She's supposed to not only do the impossible without him but do it by 7? LOL. She should accept that her punishment was getting involved with him in the first place and really look at reality.
|
|
|
|