MissMorrigan
Posts: 2309
Joined: 1/15/2005 Status: offline
|
But it would be justice if he shot his gun off and killed someone - despite being intoxicated to the point he 'didn't know what he was doing'? The thing is, how does one ever actually know if the person committing the penetrative act, while under extreme intoxication, actually is intoxicated to that degree. We are still accountable for our actions - the dominant factor in this is the penis, without which a penetrative act (unless an object is used in place of) is impossible. 'Not knowing' is no defence. There was a case in recent years of a youngish white male (in his teens) committing rapes on young girls. When he was finally caught, it transpires that he has a long history of abuse. He was born into an abusive family, the people entrusted to raise him in a secure and safe environment did anything but and this kid's role models were, in essence, rapists. He basically grew up doing what he was taught. When he was caught he went to a secure unit - indefinitely. It's very unlikely he'll ever be deemed well enough to be habilitated. I can't remember his name, but do remember the outcry at the time, although I found it distasteful to say the least b/c that poor boy clearly had diminished capacity...and that's a darn sight different than deliberately drinking one's self into a stupor and later on claiming 'I didn't know what I was doing, Guv'.
_____________________________
The Tooth Fairy who teaches kids to sell body parts for money. A free society is a society where it is safe to find one's self unpopular and where history has shown that exceptions are not that exceptional.
|