RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


hisannabelle -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/16/2008 9:39:03 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sublibrarian

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

Bipolarber:  you raise a perfectly legitimate point  ie the female suffers some physical distress. Any sensitive male could respond to that and the female could adjust accordingly. 
Unfortunately that is not what is being discussed.


What if the female suffers emotional distress? What if what's going on triggers trauma from her past and she needs what's going on to stop? Is that any less important than physical distress? Any reasonable male would respond to any sort of distress on the part of his partner.



i mentioned ptsd (which can be a physical distress situation but in these cases is mostly an emotional distress response to sex) and seeks said if i stopped having sex because i started having a ptsd reaction, he would send me to jail if he were a judge. when i questioned the lunacy, his very clear answer was we need to start talking about the real world of sexuality (because clearly that's not the real world).

just thought i'd point that out.




MissMorrigan -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 1:03:15 AM)

I agree, PS, butting heads isn't a good idea, it leads to a headache that a good drinking session didn't induce [;)]

As for consent whilst drunk - it's a moot point, given that an informed decision is not possible if one or both persons are inebriated. So if both are drunk, one has to conclude that the dominant factor here - ie the man with the penis that induces penetrative sex (it can't be the other way around unless both persons are male) - is that the man still (regardless of his seeming drunkenness) made the decision to have penetrative sex (if no penetration occured, it's sexual assault or molestation). ie it is understood that a key cannot insert itself into a lock without a hand to guide it - while we can joke all we like about guys having two brains, the fact is, the penis did not commit an act without the man guiding it.

Another fact is the onus is on the MAN to prove that he had reasonable grounds to believe the woman (or man) had consented to penetrative sex and diminished capacity (due to drink in this case) is no defence. How many times have you heard people say, "Just give her a few drinks to 'loosen' her up and you'll be well in there, mate"? I'm 43 and certainly have done, and until recent years never really gave that much thought - it's actually pretty ominous.

It's a lesson to every man to ensure his partners (regardless of gender) are sober when he's initiating sexual contact. People that are drunk know it is illegal to drive while intoxicated, a minority still do... why is it so difficult for men to understand that if they go out, have a grand old time with Jim Beam and a legover is on the cards, that it is possible the next morning their bed partner is unlikely to remember what occured and shout, "I did NOT consent to doing that!" ?  It's harsh, I agree, and the moral of the tale is quite obvious and a hell of a lot different to waking up the following day and exclaiming, "Oh man, I wish I hadn't done THAT last night!"
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53
I think we could butt heads all night on this, even though we agree on every other point. Why is the drunken male any more culpable than the equally drunken female ? You say " Not knowing " isnt a defence. i am saying "not remembering you agreed" is just as bad. The penis isnt the dominant factor if the female consents while drunk and forgets she did so the next day.




seeksfemslave -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 2:11:06 AM)

MissMorrigan appears to think that a woman, drunk or sober, could never "have her way" with a man. An example IMO would be with a younger but somewhat reticent ie shy man.

With regard to emotional distress causing an abrupt cessation of highly advanced intimate sexual contact, well on average I would call that neurotic with potentially devasting consequences.

My comment about sending Annabelle to prison has been taken too seriously.

Speaking personally I cannot believe I would rape a woman under any circumstances, but some do, most often in a brutal criminal way, occasionally under the conditions I have described .

I wonder if there are any young men say late teens early 20's who have an opinion.  In other words those whose hormones are almost driving them mad. Do the women posting understand this condition?
I can hear the responses already. lol

Orgasm in French is called le petit mort the little death. ie a fundamental temporary mental change is recognised as occurring
Extreme states of sexual arousal IMO can cause a male to temporarily revert to his most primitive natural state.
I need I have I take. Please dont shoot the messenger.





Honsoku -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 2:52:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissMorrigan
As for consent whilst drunk - it's a moot point, given that an informed decision is not possible if one or both persons are inebriated. So if both are drunk, one has to conclude that the dominant factor here - ie the man with the penis that induces penetrative sex (it can't be the other way around unless both persons are male) - is that the man still (regardless of his seeming drunkenness) made the decision to have penetrative sex (if no penetration occured, it's sexual assault or molestation). ie it is understood that a key cannot insert itself into a lock without a hand to guide it - while we can joke all we like about guys having two brains, the fact is, the penis did not commit an act without the man guiding it.

Another fact is the onus is on the MAN to prove that he had reasonable grounds to believe the woman (or man) had consented to penetrative sex and diminished capacity (due to drink in this case) is no defence. How many times have you heard people say, "Just give her a few drinks to 'loosen' her up and you'll be well in there, mate"? I'm 43 and certainly have done, and until recent years never really gave that much thought - it's actually pretty ominous.


So he's guilty until proven innocent? A woman can't initiate sex while drunk? A woman can not be sexually aggressive or in control of a sexual encounter? Seems awfully biased. I think this gender bias is what sticks in the craw of so many men when it comes to the issue of non-violent rape. The bias is that a woman can share no complicity in the outcome of a sexual encounter. Sure, men and women are equal, unless it's sex, then the man bears all responsibility.

Anyone can do anything given the right set circumstances (being physically capable being one of them). All that is different from person to person is their threshold for that action. As such, I find it a bit uneven in that we allow for mitigating circumstances for other heat-of-the-moment crimes, but to suggest such treatment for rape and suddenly you are a rapist.





seeksfemslave -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 2:59:01 AM)

quote:

Honsoku
I think this gender bias is what sticks in the craw of so many men when it comes to the issue of non-violent rape
Judging from the responses on this thread many men share that gender bias.




Politesub53 -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 3:04:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

Honsoku
I think this gender bias is what sticks in the craw of so many men when it comes to the issue of non-violent rape
Judging from the responses on this thread many men share that gender bias.


Oh please Seeks, the gender bias referred to above is to do with two drunken parties, nothing to do with men being horny and " Unable" to stop. Not only am i unable to fathom why my own gender cant stop in such situations, i also cant work out why anyone would want sex with an unwilling partner, unless it was some perverted power trip.




seeksfemslave -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 3:20:01 AM)

quote:

Honsoku As such, I find it a bit uneven in that we allow for mitigating circumstances for other heat-of-the-moment crimes, but to suggest such treatment for rape and suddenly you are a rapist


Dont see any mention of drunkeness here !.
The situation I have described is where the woman was perfectly willing and complicit and then suddenly changes.




Politesub53 -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 3:30:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

Honsoku As such, I find it a bit uneven in that we allow for mitigating circumstances for other heat-of-the-moment crimes, but to suggest such treatment for rape and suddenly you are a rapist


Dont see any mention of drunkeness here !.
The situation I have described is where the woman was perfectly willing and complicit and then suddenly changes.



Maybe not, but then we both know that wasnt part of the sentence you originally quoted, which did ( albeit the section you omitted ) mention drunkeness [;)]




Politesub53 -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 3:32:11 AM)

Seeks anyone has a right to a change of mind. Its not nice if it happens to you, but so what. We just have to suck up and deal.




Honsoku -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 3:41:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

Honsoku
I think this gender bias is what sticks in the craw of so many men when it comes to the issue of non-violent rape
Judging from the responses on this thread many men share that gender bias.


Yes, it allows them to think of women as helpless innocent beings of goodness which need protection from all the evil bad men out there. "I'll protect you! You'll be safe with me, I'm one of the good guys!" *thumps chest* (seriously guys, looking from the outside, that is what it looks like). It is one of the few cases a man can still adhere to old sexist stereotypes without being lambasted. It is the hip and politically correct bias to have (plus, almost no man has ever lost pussy by holding such a bias).

People come on a scale on how much sexual arousal affects them. On average, men seem to sit higher on the scale than women do (this could just be cultural conditioning). Some women and men sit high enough on the scale that they can become irrational if sufficiently aroused. It's not gender exclusive. To someone who isn't that high on the scale, such a thought seems inconceivable. "They must be making it up! It's an excuse for their lack of self-control." is the thought. No, it just means they are wired differently than you are. It's the same sort of thinking used towards ADHD and metabolic disorders. "The condition is an excuse. Their lack of ability to pay attention/lose weight is because of their lack of self-control". Sound familiar?




MissMorrigan -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 4:02:01 AM)

Honsoku, nowhere in my posts have I said the person could not take the initiative, nor have I said that people cannot be sexually aggressive while under the influence, clearly that is sometimes the case and does happen. What I have said is that if a man does take advantage of what's 'on offer' at the time a person IS inebriated, he cannot be at all surprised later on if the person turns around and denies having given consent once they have sobered up. People can and often do behave out of character while under the influence. I'm not saying it's right for a person to later on cry rape in such a circumstance, but how does one differentiate? Surely you cannot simply say 'chalk it up to experience, love'?

Also, what I have said is that it is not possible for a person to make a formulated decision (in this case, consent) while inebriated, for the very same reasons it's illegal to operate certain machinery (including vehicles) while intoxicated/over the legal limit.




luckydog1 -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 4:40:36 AM)

So sex while intoxicated is illegal?  Or presumed to be rape? 




MissMorrigan -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 4:44:23 AM)

No, while it isn't illegal - thankfully - it's also not the smart thing between two persons who really don't know one another all that well. I'm sure you'll agree with that.




Owner59 -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 6:08:26 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave

quote:

Honsoku
I think this gender bias is what sticks in the craw of so many men when it comes to the issue of non-violent rape
Judging from the responses on this thread many men share that gender bias.


Don`t count me in w/ you,mate.

All this run around means very little and doesn`t shed any light on what`s a very grim situation.

Talk all you want ,disassemble and reassemble the issue forever.We aren`t talking about "what ifs" or "how abouts".We`re talking about a serious problem that`s mostly,if not always created by men.




hisannabelle -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 7:42:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

So sex while intoxicated is illegal?  Or presumed to be rape? 


legally you cannot consent when you are intoxicated, so yes, if one party is intoxicated and the other isn't - but of course if both parties are intoxicated that blurs things.




Firebirdseeking -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 8:27:26 AM)

I felt compelled to add my comments to this thread.  Seeksfemslave, you seem to have stirred up a storm and I suspect you are delighting in it.  First, rape is a crime.  Second it is a crime of violence, and of misogyny. Third, we are all responsible for our own behavior, and that includes combining alcohol and sex with a partner one does not know and trust.  Third, a woman has the right to change her mind.  Fourth, if she changes her mind in flagrante delicto, she may have a harder time in court.  Fifth, I challenge you to think about what you are saying; you cannot stop just because you are aroused?  There is an old Yiddish saying that translates into:  "when the prick stands up, the mind goes blank"  I guess that is what you are saying about yourself...hmmm.  If you are not in control of yourself, what kind of master would you be?  How could you control a sub/slave??    




carlie310 -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 8:46:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissMorrigan


Another fact is the onus is on the MAN to prove that he had reasonable grounds to believe the woman (or man) had consented to penetrative sex and diminished capacity (due to drink in this case) is no defence.



This is not true in the United States.  The burden of proof is on the woman, and the man has the presumption of innocence.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MissMorrigan

So if both are drunk, one has to conclude that the dominant factor here - ie the man with the penis that induces penetrative sex (it can't be the other way around unless both persons are male) - is that the man still (regardless of his seeming drunkenness) made the decision to have penetrative sex (if no penetration occured, it's sexual assault or molestation).


One does not have to conclude this.  In fact, it's a pretty big leap of logic, and no greater than the one that would say that since the woman has to welcome the man into her body, she must have made the decision to have sex.  Because otherwise, she would have said no. 

If I choose to do tequila shots, get naked with a guy, and go along with the endorphins, and then realize the next morning that it wasn't really what I wanted to do but I was drunk--that doesn't make him a criminal.  Maybe it just makes him foolish, maybe he was in the same place I was. . .but criminal? No.

Edited to fix quoting issue.




eyesopened -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 8:52:46 AM)

i've read nearly the entire thread and somehow people seem to have rape confused with sex.  Rape has nothing whatsoever to do with sexual desire and everything to do with anger.

This will be my first time ever telling anyone i was raped.  i was raped by a man i loved.  His breaking down the locked bedroom door had nothing to do with his sexual desires or needs.  It had everything to do with his need to hurt me, shame me, kill my soul, rob me of self-esteem.

No, i didn't report it because who would believe me?  Who would stand up for me?  Who would care?  How could he rape me if i had been giving it up willingly before?  Rape is not sex its a robbery.  He took something from me then that can never be fully replaced.




Firebirdseeking -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 10:29:56 AM)

You have courage and said it perfectly.

firebirdseeking




LadyEllen -> RE: Tennessee Senator "rape just isn’t what it used to be" .What a jerk! (2/17/2008 10:32:14 AM)

I would still like a response on this post Seeks - I'm sure it was missed, and not studiously overlooked?


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

I've read all your contributions Seeks, but I still dont get what you mean.

If we assumed that there was a "point of no return" for a man, then it would have to be a second or so prior to ejaculation. Unless we're talking about guys with premature ejaculation problems, then guys can stop at any point prior to this surely? And I would fancy that anyone they are having sex with would have made clear well before that "point of no return" that they wanted him to stop.

So I really cant see how your argument - as I understand it - stands up (forgive the unintended pun). Any man who is so bereft of self control that he cannot control his arousal and cannot stop himself is at best a disappointment to his partner and likely a danger to society.

E




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875