RE: Do you value intelligence? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Ask a Master



Message


Justme696 -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/19/2008 1:59:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlackPhx

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

mmm intelligence

at all

lets stir something up.....many say intelligence is a turn on...Adolf Hitler was intelligent ( He made a whole country folow him)...many mass murderers are extremely intelligent...
still attracted to intelligence?



Actually more charisma and political accumen crossed with ruthless ambition/w a good dose of Intelligence. Eva Braun was very attracted to him, one could say devoted since she not only married him on April 29, 1945 but suicided with him (reportedly) on April 30, 1945 .  

Most of our Politicians are intelligent (not all are equally so), few who are shy on intelligence points ever rise above street sweeper or minimum wage jobs. Intelligence is neither inherently good or bad, what you do with it decides that. But it sure helps to have someone behind the eyes to talk to once the sexual play is over.

poenkitten

bit offtopic


Hitler ..known from a recent research done....treated his females very bad. Mostly likele it was,...that no one dared to offend him...not even his niece.
(Hitler liked females to pee over him..but never touched them  other wise). 2 other females were found dead (suicide to escape from him).around him..but as he was the ruler...it was called an accident




lovingpet -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/19/2008 6:32:50 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

quote:

ORIGINAL: lovingpet

quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

quote:

ORIGINAL: amayos



Intelligence is always a virtue. However, knowledge of "current issues and world events" isn't necessarily a good measure of intelligence in general, or the type of intelligence that is sought. I imagine some Keepers may desire distance from these things in their servants for any number of understandable reasons, such as disassociation from outside influence.

We typically like to model intelligence in the form of ability to debate, but I find one's aptness to sit at the feet of another, look up, listen and zealously absorb equally as valid.


When one is trying to form a working team- with one as the servant........then the ability of the servant to fully comprehend the game plan and execute it is a sign of very high intelligence. The ability to be in compliance, in a thoughtful and useful manner is valuable in such a situation.

Indeed, one does not delegate important responsibilities to a "blow up doll".

Any more than one would delegate them to a fractious "debator" who was so busy arguing and being afflicted with tunnel vision.....that thier much vaunted "intelligence" became a disability to thier performance.

In short, such individuals are so busy proving thier "strength", that they become incompetent to in any way equate to the word.

Serving with dilligence and astounding ability does not equate to being a "doormat" in my eyes. It points to worthiness. I'd take the doormat over the asshat any day.


I always hope to maintain a balance about myself.  I want to use my mind with all the force it demands to be satisfied, but I do not want to ever seem to be condescending to others.  The ability to collaborate and contribute in a relationship are skills that are clearly underrated (just look at soaring divorce rates and at the ever shortening lengths of other unions).  I hope my posts are a help and give uesful fodder for a conversation to a thread and that this intention is always clear in my posts, or as much as a flawed individual can manage.

Regards,
lovingpet


I despise the culture we live in. From early on, we are taught to compete, rather than to cooperate. It's no wonder that we have become destroyers of the earth, and of each other.

When we learn to cherish creation and creators, and to strive to leave places better when we leave them...........rather than use them and abuse them......we can do the same with our relationships. I don't want to compete with my friend. I want to become-more.



It is by far better to bring it all together than to fall alone.....

lovingpet




lovingpet -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/19/2008 6:40:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlackPhx

I have to agree with you Littlesui, though not all interests, etc have to be shared, contrast can be fun as well. Fortunately Master enjoys my intellectual skills, and vice versa. As for myself, if and when we find a sub to join us, we will definately be looking for someone who can contribute to household knowledge, intellectual debate and further learning. Afterall, while you can play for several hours, eventually you would like to have someone there behind the eyes to talk to.  

poenkitten


Complete capatability is boring.  That means you are living with yourself.  Some may be so bold as to say that would be a wonderful world, but I know for a fact that I would get on my nerves.  I like to think of good capatability as overlapping circles.  There should be much shared at the core of the interests (the more, the better), but plenty of areas of unlike areas for the couple to learn and explore about each other.  This circle should ever expand both in the common core and the outside interest and, in so doing, the couple stays fresh and intimately connected. It takes a level of mental curiosity to desire to learn about one's partner and their interests.  I guess since I want ever growing relationships with only a few close people, that is why I seek people that will be able to attain the new knowledge and skills they seek to better understand me and others in our circle.

Regards,
lovingpet 




Foititis -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/20/2008 4:28:43 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterBlueTiger
My point is that if I run into the most caring, loyal, cheerful, and hardworking girl in the world I am not going to reject her just because she cannot recite the Pathagorean Theorum. Thats just silly.


Now I'm just a facetious academic but any girl who doesn't know year 8 mathematics isn't someone I'd be looking into as a perceivable partner.




PrimeVector -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/20/2008 10:14:41 AM)

Absolutely.  I find a direct correlation between a willingness to explore and enjoy the various kinks within one's self, and one's level of awareness of the world around them.

That, at any rate, has been my direct experience so far.  Perhaps I'll find something different one day, and if so, that's fine as well.  I like to keep an open mind in most matters, if it helps foster positive growth for either myself, or my sub.





subtee -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/20/2008 11:00:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Foititis

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterBlueTiger
My point is that if I run into the most caring, loyal, cheerful, and hardworking girl in the world I am not going to reject her just because she cannot recite the Pathagorean Theorum. Thats just silly.


Now I'm just a facetious academic but any girl who doesn't know year 8 mathematics isn't someone I'd be looking into as a perceivable partner.


Why? Will you be solving equations while she's tied up? Have her solve for pi while you spank her?

Seriously, is it mathematics, or are you using that as an example of a base minimum of education? It's possible she may be far more intelligent than you in other areas...

Besides, math is fake.

~English major tee




Justme696 -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/20/2008 11:04:33 AM)

I have a title in front of my name...and I have a high education...but  I learned also...that intelligence is not only for people with a pile of diploma's.
Soem people with no education at all..overwelm me with life experience..which seems more important then all I know by times




Foititis -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/21/2008 2:23:17 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subtee
Seriously, is it mathematics, or are you using that as an example of a base minimum of education? It's possible she may be far more intelligent than you in other areas...

I was going more for base level of education. While I concede someone lacking in math and science may have a vastly superior knowledge of humanities to me. I put it to you some one who can't comprehend something that simple could fathom Nietzsche? Or Descartes?  I should think not. 

quote:

ORIGINAL: subtee
Besides, math is fake.
~English major tee

Math is eternal, humanities last so long as our frail species. I think you picked the wrong camp there, lol.  




NycCouple -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/21/2008 2:41:52 AM)

ISO Submissive, has to be female or similar, has to have a PhD in combinatorial graph theory and/or related areas. Fluency in ancient greek a must (that is the chosen language of training sessions). If you didn't write poetry by age 3, go elsewhere.

Seriously though, I can't imagine using someone who isn't extremely intelligent for anything more than a very simple, functional relationship. What's the point of making a monkey submit?




adoracat -> RE: Do you value intelligence? (2/21/2008 5:27:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Foititis

I was going more for base level of education. While I concede someone lacking in math and science may have a vastly superior knowledge of humanities to me. I put it to you some one who can't comprehend something that simple could fathom Nietzsche? Or Descartes?  I should think not. 



would you slight a brilliant person who happened to have dyslexia and had to learn differently?

there's a thing called dyscalcula, also dysnumerica.  same thing, but with numbers.  they twist themselves round and wont stay in the proper order.  i remembered my grandmother's phone number only because i could sing the notes on the touchtone telephone.    but i can hold up my end of a conversation nicely, and spent a lovely weekend recently idly debating politics with a lovely gentleman while we soaked in a jacuzzi.

he and Daddy both appreciate my mind, even if it works a little differently than theirs do.  and i cant name my times tables.  [:)]

learning disabilities aside, common sense and intelligence in equal measures are lovely things to find in a partner.  humor goes a long way in making a prospective partner attractive also. 

kitten "but that's just me"




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 6 [7]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125