Noah
Posts: 1660
Joined: 7/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CalifChick quote:
ORIGINAL: Noah I'm curious after seeing two posters suggest that sexual activity and D/s are mutually exclusive categories. I think I was one of those. I wasn't suggesting they were mutually exclusive, more like not necessarily inclusive. Mhmmm. quote:
Is getting his coffee and putting cream and sugar in it the way he likes D/s? It can be, but it's also been part of every relationship I've ever had, vanilla or non-vanilla. The fact that it is something I do for him does not make it D/s, just as it does not make it NOT D/s. Same with your laundry example. The laundry needed to be done long before I ever met him, so I don't suddenly classify doing it as a D/s thing just because now I have a Dom. I had anal sex for the first time as a teenager. Wasn't part of a D/s dynamic at all. It was something I wanted to do and he wanted to do and we did it. It seems clear that her background differs from yours. Her backside too, if we consider wear and tear, eh? quote:
So I don't see the act itself as having to do with D/s. It can be a part of a D/s relationship, but no more than every other sexual act that mankind can think of. I think your point is made and that in the end <ahem> we don't disagree. When you said earlier: "I think I'm missing the connection between ANY sexual activity and D/s." you apparently meant that as elliptical for "any necessary connection". Given that the topic seemed to enquire about whether anal sex was structural to a D/s relationship I can see where you were comng from. I don't want to sidetrack things, but if the serious discussion is done I'd like to share my vision of some people around a Monopoly board, compulsively re-aligning little red hotels; restacking play money and demanding that the tossed dice land just so. I mean anal play is anal play, right?
|