RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


OrionTheWolf -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/24/2008 7:20:40 PM)

Mutual Assured Destruction works fine if those involved are rational. That is where I have a problem, I believe their are some very fanatical extremist within the Islamic Fascist, and that is why I have a problem with Iran having nuclear capability. I would rather be resigned, than have regret about this.

Could you explain about your last comment?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

"The only thing I am worried about is nuclear capability in the hands of extremist. I do not care which side it is on, but the fanaticism is the scary part".

I think mutually assured destruction,will prevent Iran from using nuclear weapons.

From what a few have said,mutual distruction is preferable.The "kill them all let god sort them out" POV is not helpful or even cute.

I understand the frustration of some people(god knows people are beyond sick and tired).But simple answers from simple minds, have had two terms to ply their simple logic in the middle east.

It`s time for a committed,fair and pro-active approach to mid-east peace.





Owner59 -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/24/2008 7:41:53 PM)

 



Sure.

An approach similar to Clinton`s and Carter`s.Pro-active and sustained,like we did in northern Ireland.

We should have our best and brightest involved,not dumb and dumber.All it would take is force of will and leadership.


The laissez-faire attitude and the one sided approach of the last 7 years has gotten people nowhere.Some would say we`ve lost ground.





Real0ne -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/24/2008 7:49:43 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Rule

"911 comes to mind - there were not even any highjackers on the two planes used, nor on the other two planes that never existed. Also various notorious bombings."


lol, nuff said. 




puhlease!  So how would you like it if it were your id card found and you were automatically guilty?  All I have to do is produce an ID say it was you and all of america puts you there.  No dna found from any of them nothing that can be used in a court, zippo.  

Is that the kind of justice you want in this country?  Especially when ole rummy starts singin this TUNE to parade mag:

U.S. Department of Defense
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs)

News Transcript

Rumsfeld: There were lots of warnings. The intelligence information that we get, it sometimes runs into the hundreds of alerts or pieces of intelligence a week. One looks at the worldwide, it's thousands

Here we're talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.



Speaking of holocaust denial!


quote:


I`d love to see the 50% unemployment rate cut to 5 or 10 and allow people some dignity.

I would love for this to not all be put on the Arabs and made all their fault.

I would love to see a frank and honest discussion of this very important subject.I would love to see people who`re againt finding solutions to STFU.

Would a thread on solutions devolve into a hateful,ugly and counterproductive exercise?


Many parts of THIS country have 50%+ unemployment as they are only counted while they are actually collecting unemployment then not counted when it runs out!!

I suggest taking care of our own back yard before others.

How can it be made into their fault?  How would you like it if the jones cult was given 3 square miles beside your house and then constantly encroached on your turf as they do with the pals?

The israeli state was created by us for us and the arabs had no say so in the matter.  It doesnt even meet their tests for land ownership customs.  We basically plunked them there and well boyz heres your new home and we are going ot kick anyones ass who does not like it.  How do you reconcile that?

What about expansionism and those who want to live near home?  Where are tehy going to go?  They will squat on pal land.  Its become a religious battle now because its a religious state! (home of judism everyone else keep off the grass).  and if you dont we have f16's, nukes, tanks and we will fry your asses!

Its nice to dream some kind of idealistic scenario akin to a 60's lovin peace fest but how do you plan on implementing all that on the grand scheme into something productive?  Thats what I would like to know?

Personally I do not see it. They get to much money for things to stay just the way they are and it gives politicians something to politic about every election.   In other words they both have to much to gain with things as they are and so does our government.

Now as far as the people are concerned.... 


quote:

we did in northern Ireland.

The laissez-faire attitude and the one sided approach of the last 7 years has gotten people nowhere.Some would say we`ve lost ground.


they dont play by the same rule book however.


Either that or the alleged ground gained was great show n tell for the public.  It would make a great soap opera when you think about it.

Personally I do not see this as a resolvable issue considering the parties involved.  (at least not in our lifetimes)








OrionTheWolf -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/24/2008 8:37:09 PM)

I have never understood why every admin has not had a single person in charge of dealing with just Mid East issues, like one of the Deputy Secretaries. I believe in continued communication and diplomacy, as long as we also have our weapons close by as well. To be pacifistic is just as foolish to be as aggressive as the current admin has been.

If we appear too soft, then what is Iran's incentive to do anything?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Sure.

An approach similar to Clinton`s and Carter`s.Pro-active and sustained,like we did in northern Ireland.

We should have our best and brightest involved,not dumb and dumber.All it would take is force of will and leadership.


The laissez-faire attitude and the one sided approach of the last 7 years has gotten people nowhere.Some would say we`ve lost ground.






NorthernGent -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/24/2008 11:28:26 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Forgive me if I sounded belligerent there, but you will agree that sometimes, life is fight or flee. Too many posters are trying to make a case against Israel out of a myriad of links and quotes, instead of concentrating on solutions. It gets tedious to hear the same arguments again and again, no?



There's a heavy burden of proof to be accompanied with any form of violence. As I understand it, the Israeli government has not satisfied this burden.

In terms of tedious and the same arguments, you were more than happy to get stuck in and argue your case.

In terms of a solution, I see only one viable solution for the Israeli government - they're going to have to take a risk and aim for conciliation. You just can't keep people in their place for a lengthy (cheers LAM, most useful) period of time - far better to come to an agreement through diplomacy than have the tables turned through force.

Edited to add: maybe the Israel government thinks they've reached the point of no return - they've pissed them off that much.




meatcleaver -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/25/2008 2:45:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Sure.

An approach similar to Clinton`s and Carter`s.Pro-active and sustained,like we did in northern Ireland.



In northern Ireland, the British had fought the IRA to a stand still. IRA members couldn't go for a piss without the British knowing about it but at the same time, Britain began a political process with Sinn Fein. Sinn Fein got into the political process so deep it couldn't scupper them without losing credibility with many of its more moderate supporters. Clinton's willingness to put some political investment into the process had a positive effect on the Republican side. 9/11 more or less finished the process because the American government were no longer willing to countenance Americans funding terrorists, especially in an allie's country.

Israel is unwilling to allow Arabs into the political process without them agreeing with Israel before negotiations even begin. Israel is not willing to consider the possibility of complete withdrawal from the occupied territories and the US is not willing to threaten Israel with cutting off its funding if it doesn't positively engage in peace negotiations. I know many Americans claim Ehud Barak offered the Palestinians more or less everything in a peace initiative but this is not so. What he in effect offered was similar to what the US gave native Americans, reservations controled and policed by Israel. If the Palestinians are to be offered a state and Bush to his credit has been the first American President to mention this, it has to be meaningful with the Palestinians policing their own borders and in control of their own economy. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, is no where near the conflict in Northern Ireland and never will as long as the US is backing one side against the other, this wasn't the case in Ireland and it wouldn't have been allowed to be the case even if they wanted it that way.




Alumbrado -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 12:01:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

ps.I`m also fascinated that Alumbrado/luckdog will see my thoughts on solutions think I`m a holocaust denier.



The thoughts that I'm seeing claim that the historical references which document that  Arabs or Muslims had been involved in the Holocaust or other pre-Israel genocidal pogroms are BS and vile propaganda which should not be cited . 

I'm also seeing others hijack attempts to discuss realistic solutions by claiming that the Jews are the ones whose actions need to be criticised, and dismissing the history of violence against them (Holocaust et al.) as
quote:

...whatever [Jews, Bush, kindergarten bullies, whatever] thinks they did.


On the documented fact that there were 1920s Mufti directed Palestinian death squads targeting Jews in Jerusalem, one response was...
quote:

'What facts?'....   and .....  'Jews lived in Palestine before World War II without any animosity toward them... lived in peace. It was only when an invasion force displaced these people from their homes that they became angry.'


Those may not be denial or derail in your book, but they will do until a 'real' denier comes along.

And trying later to spin the straw argument that this was a noble defense of all Arabs/Muslims who weren't involved (insinuating that the naming of specific names, places, and incidents from history books was wholesale slander), does nothing to inspire confidence in altruistic motives.

Speak the words, wear the label...now who spoke these words, in specific reference to the historical article on Al-Husseini's Arab/Muslim campaign of genocide against the Jews in collaboration with the Reich?

quote:

Not sure what you were trying to do by linking middle eastern Arabs with the nazis,but is was pure bullshit and vile propaganda.  



As I stated, I have no intention of debating with any of you whether or not the the Arab role in the Holocaust, or the other dates and atrocities against Jews I listed actually occurred, since they are a matter of record...
If you want to deny them, feel free to back it up to someone else, and feel free to complain when I call it denial.


Now for those willing to address real solutions, it is mandatory to quit relying on sound bites, and address these factors:

>That linked to (among other things) centuries of Muslim/Arab and European attempts at genocide, many Jewish people currently believe (rightly or wrongly), that their lives depend upon supporting Israel's policies.

>That linked to (among other things) recent events involving territory, in the eyes of many Palestinians, their survival is linked to the successful actions of their leaders.


Because without grasping that both sides of this cycle of violence think they are acting in the right, and that both sides are in fact perpetuating it, there will be no solutions found.  Read up on conflict mediation, this is a core principle.

Admit to that in total, not in part, and we can start talking about the current mistakes on the parts of both governments.




meatcleaver -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 1:53:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

ps.I`m also fascinated that Alumbrado/luckdog will see my thoughts on solutions think I`m a holocaust denier.



The thoughts that I'm seeing claim that the historical references which document that  Arabs or Muslims had been involved in the Holocaust or other pre-Israel genocidal pogroms are BS and vile propaganda which should not be cited . 

As I keep pointing out to you Alumbrado and you keep willfully ignoring my posts because they are inconvenient to your world view, the start of this conflict was the Balfour Declaration which was religiously inspired, Balfour being a religious nut and more interested in the 'chosen people' returning to their biblical homeland than the good governance of the region. This was a good ten years before anything you cited and Balfour encouraged imigration of Jewish aliens into the region and gave moral support to the zionists who were involved in illegal immigration into the region. It was Balfour's declaration, his support for the zionists and the zionist's illegal activities that started the conflict (Hell! The zionists were not secretive about their aims or what they planned to do to the resident Arab population!) and caused an Arab reaction. Let's be honest about this, before anything anti Jewish you can cite by the Arabs, the zionists had alrerady declared that the region needed to be cleansed of Arabs.
 
You can ignore my posts but others will read them so why don't you just stop running away and argue your point instead of hiding behind generalisations and unwilling to admit you are wrong.

I'm also seeing others hijack attempts to discuss realistic solutions by claiming that the Jews are the ones whose actions need to be criticised, and dismissing the history of violence against them (Holocaust et al.) as
quote:

...whatever [Jews, Bush, kindergarten bullies, whatever] thinks they did.


On the documented fact that there were 1920s Mufti directed Palestinian death squads targeting Jews in Jerusalem, one response was...
quote:

'What facts?'....   and .....  'Jews lived in Palestine before World War II without any animosity toward them... lived in peace. It was only when an invasion force displaced these people from their homes that they became angry.'


Those may not be denial or derail in your book, but they will do until a 'real' denier comes along.

And trying later to spin the straw argument that this was a noble defense of all Arabs/Muslims who weren't involved (insinuating that the naming of specific names, places, and incidents from history books was wholesale slander), does nothing to inspire confidence in altruistic motives.

Speak the words, wear the label...now who spoke these words, in specific reference to the historical article on Al-Husseini's Arab/Muslim campaign of genocide against the Jews in collaboration with the Reich?

quote:

Not sure what you were trying to do by linking middle eastern Arabs with the nazis,but is was pure bullshit and vile propaganda.  



As I stated, I have no intention of debating with any of you whether or not the the Arab role in the Holocaust, or the other dates and atrocities against Jews I listed actually occurred, since they are a matter of record...
If you want to deny them, feel free to back it up to someone else, and feel free to complain when I call it denial.


Now for those willing to address real solutions, it is mandatory to quit relying on sound bites, and address these factors:

>That linked to (among other things) centuries of Muslim/Arab and European attempts at genocide, many Jewish people currently believe (rightly or wrongly), that their lives depend upon supporting Israel's policies.

>That linked to (among other things) recent events involving territory, in the eyes of many Palestinians, their survival is linked to the successful actions of their leaders.


Because without grasping that both sides of this cycle of violence think they are acting in the right, and that both sides are in fact perpetuating it, there will be no solutions found.  Read up on conflict mediation, this is a core principle.

Admit to that in total, not in part, and we can start talking about the current mistakes on the parts of both governments.

Let's get to the heart of ther matter, the Arabs didn't start this conflict, you can blame that on Balfour and the zionists. You can't blame the Arabs for the holocaust, no matter how much mud you want to throw around, that was commited by the Germans and other European collaborators. Everything you have accused the Arabs of was a reaction to events they did not start!
 
And the one thing people like you never face up to is that Israel in its dealings with the occupied Arabs breaks just about every international law and every treaty on human rights you care you mention and is aided and abetted by the US and other western countries who claim to support civilized values and the rule of law. The Arab anti-Jewish sentiment is not anti-semetic (Hey, here's a news flash for you, the Arabs are a semetic people themselves), it has a specific cause and solution, whether you agree with that cause or not ie another matter but only the ignorant can claim it doesn't exist.
 
I know you don't have the bottle to answer specifics, prefering to throw mud around than to admit you are wrong and reacting out of self righteousness while ignoring the facts. 
 




meatcleaver -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 3:55:03 AM)

Oh, and Alumbrado, you don't mention the zionist's willingness to fight along side the Nazis. Though there has been an attempt to explain this away as the zionists wanting to the Germans to deport Jews to Trans-Jordania but many would say the real motive (and there are documents to back this up) was to fight the British because the socialist dominated British wartime government saw the zionists as a fascist style terrorist organisation. Yes, the British needed Arab oil for the war effort but the British postwar policy does reinforce the view that British views of the zionists had fundementally changed.




NorthernGent -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 4:35:34 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

I'm also seeing others hijack attempts to discuss realistic solutions by claiming that the Jews are the ones whose actions need to be criticised



This thread seems to be too close to the bone for you, Alumbrado - emotionally invested comes to mind.

I haven't read anyone discussing "the Jews"; the Israeli government, however, is being criticised.




Real0ne -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 6:52:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

I'm also seeing others hijack attempts to discuss realistic solutions by claiming that the Jews are the ones whose actions need to be criticised



This thread seems to be too close to the bone for you, Alumbrado - emotionally invested comes to mind.

I haven't read anyone discussing "the Jews"; the Israeli government, however, is being criticised.



Yup I would agree with NG here so I am not going to comment on that and change it to one question that has yet to be answered on any board.

WHY?

Why is so much of the world against the jews?  Why the jews?  Why not the hindus or the catholics or the msulims?   Why would what seems to be so many different cultures, people, countries, what seems like the whole freaking world pick on the jews and no one else? 

What I do not understand is, is the whole world that unfair and predudiced or is there something more to the story than meets the eye?  So why are the practitioners of judaism always being picked on by general populations?

Anyone?






Sinergy -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 7:09:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Yeh good point.  However its still a port we can land whatever we want with no arguments, just get the invoice.



As I recall, we paid a lot of money to Saudi Arabia to land there for the Kuwait war and the invasion of Iraq.

The reality of how the US "benefits" from our relationship with Israel is far different than the brochure the lobbyist
hands out would have us believe.

Sinergy




Owner59 -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 7:20:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Sure.

An approach similar to Clinton`s and Carter`s.Pro-active and sustained,like we did in northern Ireland.



In northern Ireland, the British had fought the IRA to a stand still. IRA members couldn't go for a piss without the British knowing about it but at the same time, Britain began a political process with Sinn Fein. Sinn Fein got into the political process so deep it couldn't scupper them without losing credibility with many of its more moderate supporters. Clinton's willingness to put some political investment into the process had a positive effect on the Republican side. 9/11 more or less finished the process because the American government were no longer willing to countenance Americans funding terrorists, especially in an allie's country.

Israel is unwilling to allow Arabs into the political process without them agreeing with Israel before negotiations even begin. Israel is not willing to consider the possibility of complete withdrawal from the occupied territories and the US is not willing to threaten Israel with cutting off its funding if it doesn't positively engage in peace negotiations. I know many Americans claim Ehud Barak offered the Palestinians more or less everything in a peace initiative but this is not so. What he in effect offered was similar to what the US gave native Americans, reservations controled and policed by Israel. If the Palestinians are to be offered a state and Bush to his credit has been the first American President to mention this, it has to be meaningful with the Palestinians policing their own borders and in control of their own economy. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict, is no where near the conflict in Northern Ireland and never will as long as the US is backing one side against the other, this wasn't the case in Ireland and it wouldn't have been allowed to be the case even if they wanted it that way.


All valid points,Meat.

My main point about the US`s roll was to act as a peace facilitator.

The Irish peace process was started during Reagan`s term and took until the end of Clinton`s term to complete.It wouldn`t have happen as quickly(term used loosely) or at all,without the US there and active.

The same long term thing has to happen in the ME and the veto pen of the bombers must be removed from the negotiating table.That`s giving the bastards to much power.

Our roll should be to keep,keep`n on and to not take sides.

Gotta go to work,more later.




kittinSol -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 7:40:18 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Why is so much of the world against the jews?  Why the jews?  Why not the hindus or the catholics or the msulims?   Why would what seems to be so many different cultures, people, countries, what seems like the whole freaking world pick on the jews and no one else? 



The world isn't against the Jews (but you are). Actually, it's in Europe that anti-Jewish resentment slowly gained momentum, largely due to the lie permeated by the Church that 'they killed Jesus'... and the mother of all pogroms happened there. Though from the fall of the Roman Empire everone in Europe pretty much accommodated one another - for a while. Judaism and other religions lived in harmony in places like North Africa, the Middle-East, and Turkey - Turkey being the haven for many Jews who had escaped the Spanish Inquisition in the 1500's. Actually, harmony between the Mosque, the Synanogue and the local Catholic church still prevails in most of these countries, where there is a historical tradition of cultural tolerance.

quote:



What I do not understand is, is the whole world that unfair and predudiced or is there something more to the story than meets the eye?  So why are the practitioners of judaism always being picked on by general populations?

Anyone?



Having read your views on this subject on more than one occasion, it's obvious to me that you know the answers to your questions... and that you ask them purely for rhetorical purposes, as you have uttered many times that you think Jewish people attracted the hatred on to themselves.




NorthernGent -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 7:45:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

So why are the practitioners of judaism always being picked on by general populations?



If this were true, it says far more of the general population than it does the minority group.

Consider Tony Blair and his Christian mission to heal the savages in Iraq: have we really moved on since WW2? Consider, also, that those of the Jewish faith have been on the receiving end on numerous occasions.

Fortunately, Englishness is not determined by blood, but in other nations it is; such as Germany, where you may have lived in Outer Mongolia all of your life, but providing you're called Schmidt or Muller, you can apply for German citizenship; that is quite dangerous in my mind, and ready made for exploitation in the right/wrong circumstances.

Consider these and you'll understand the nervousness of those of the Jewish faith.

Having said this, the above doesn't negate the fact that this Israeli government is acting like a fascist police state.




meatcleaver -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 8:48:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

So why are the practitioners of judaism always being picked on by general populations?

Anyone?



They aren't. Go to the far east, no one gives a damn. The Jews have been on the receiving end of European anti-semeticism which is a direct result of Christianity and the  religious power politics of the early Chritian Church and the need to blame someone other than the Romans for the murder of Jesus. Of course the Romans killed Jesus, crucifixion was a Roman punishment and no one else was allowed to use it. If the Jews had executed Jesus, they would have stoned him to death. To take this nonsense further, in the first century Europeans on the Iberian penisula were converting to both Christianity and Judeaism, depending who their paymaster was, most ordinary people didn't know the difference anyway.

The muslims have never had a problem with the Jews before the Balfour Declaration and his backing of the zionists and their policies instead of the good governance of Trans-Jordania was basically the start of the conflict. Basically, the Brits started the ME conflict by allowing a religious nut to be a Foreign Secretary and allowing him to support a nationalist organisation in the last place a nationalist organisation was needed.

Germany had never been more anti-semetic than any other European country, including Britain but WWI and the decision to humiliate Germany afterwards created conditions were extremism could take a hold. Britain if it had less anti-semiticism than Germany or France it was because it has historiucally had less Jews. This is because Edward III expelled them in 1290 and executed many heads of households. He blamed such things as their use of usuary but in fact it was a way of getting out of paying debts owed to the Jews. Cromwell allowed the Jews to return to Britain in the 17th century because he believed in them being the chosen people but he did recommend they keep a low profile. Anti-semeticism has always had a place in Britain, sometimes more than others, as when there was a wave of Jewish immigration at the end of the 19th century. But on the whole, Britain has never had a sizeable Jewish population since the 13th century so anti-semiticism was never going to be a huge issue. Of course its a major issue if you are a Jew but I'm talking in general terms.

Actually, I think it is the nature of the Abramic religions why all three Abramic religions are antagonistic to each other. Personally I find all three of the great monthesistic religions distasteful (maybe even repugnant)with their willingness to invoke god to justify their actions.




Real0ne -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 8:59:28 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

Why is so much of the world against the jews?  Why the jews?  Why not the hindus or the catholics or the msulims?   Why would what seems to be so many different cultures, people, countries, what seems like the whole freaking world pick on the jews and no one else?



The world isn't against the Jews (but you are). Actually, it's in Europe that anti-Jewish resentment slowly gained momentum, largely due to the lie permeated by the Church that 'they killed Jesus'... and the mother of all pogroms happened there. Though from the fall of the Roman Empire everone in Europe pretty much accommodated one another - for a while. Judaism and other religions lived in harmony in places like North Africa, the Middle-East, and Turkey - Turkey being the haven for many Jews who had escaped the Spanish Inquisition in the 1500's. Actually, harmony between the Mosque, the Synanogue and the local Catholic church still prevails in most of these countries, where there is a historical tradition of cultural tolerance.

quote:



What I do not understand is, is the whole world that unfair and predudiced or is there something more to the story than meets the eye?  So why are the practitioners of judaism always being picked on by general populations?

Anyone?



Having read your views on this subject on more than one occasion, it's obvious to me that you know the answers to your questions... and that you ask them purely for rhetorical purposes, as you have uttered many times that you think Jewish people attracted the hatred on to themselves.


Firstly:
"The world isn't against the Jews (but you are)."
Thats not true at all.  I have said many times that I dated and would be married to a nice jude gurl had cancer not married her first.  Now you may be pissed off that I do not fall into line with the surface dwellers but I have through experience come to find most things in life are never what they seem.  Obviously the whole world is not against the jews, that was only a figure of speech, but there are so many it certainly seems that way?

I am not sure that your argument makes sense since jesus was a jew after all and they killed one of their own did they not?   Not only that wasnt it a roman who ordered his death?  Christianity is a past tense.  Which is to say the christian movement took place AD not BD. (if you know what i mean).  That and wasnt it a roman who run him through with a sword delivering the fatal blow which ultimately killed him?

So you feel that this was a monstrous propaganda disinformation plot by the catholics then to get the whole christian world to hate jews and it worked?   I thought most of europe was some flavor of muslim?

So then that still begs the question; why do the muslims and so many other religions seem to have so many issues with jews?  Glancing at the above topic tiltle...  They (iranians), are not catholics are they?  The iraqis and palestinians arent catholic either.

Now what you say would make sense to me if other religions were not involved so thanks for trying but you havent even approached answering this to my satisfaction, at least so far.  (which means I am still looking for the deeper reason since the surface reasons given simply do not add up)   

So my question remains unanswered.  Why does it seem that everyone is against the jews?  (and no this is not rhetorical in the sense that my mind is closed)  That doesnt however negate that I continually make conclusions based on my personal knowledge base which is always in flux.






Alumbrado -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 9:09:30 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

I'm also seeing others hijack attempts to discuss realistic solutions by claiming that the Jews are the ones whose actions need to be criticised



This thread seems to be too close to the bone for you, Alumbrado - emotionally invested comes to mind.

I haven't read anyone discussing "the Jews"; the Israeli government, however, is being criticised.


The quotes about 'Jews and bullies', 'Jews were never attacked' et al. are from right here in this thread...how selective is your reading, and more importantly what emotional investment do you have that creates such blinders?




NorthernGent -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 9:44:59 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

The quotes about 'Jews and bullies'



The Israeli government is a bully: it's taking homes from people at gun point. That's bullying in any man's terms.

I can't find anywhere on this thread where "Jews are bullies" has been stated.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

'Jews were never attacked' et al. are from right here in this thread...how selective is your reading,



"The Jews were never attacked" in what context and on which post?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

and more importantly what emotional investment do you have that creates such blinders?



Let's reserve judgement on the blinders comment until you've pointed out the posts to which you refer in the above quotes.

Edited to add: 'no need for me to pursue the comments in my last post.




Alumbrado -> RE: Iran: Israel will soon disappear (2/26/2008 10:00:06 AM)

Those posts have already been directly quoted, here on this page among other places...and you can stop playing games like altering 'Jews and bullies' to 'Jews are bullies'. 
As I said, I'm not playing into your dishonest debate tactics. Believe what you like, and feel free to impress anyone who falls for it.




Page: <<   < prev  10 11 [12] 13 14   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875