Noah
Posts: 1660
Joined: 7/5/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: die4urpleasure There's an increasing amount of profiles that show a basic lack of understanding of what one might do and what one is. Here we have a sentence introducing a post about failures of self-understanding. Unfortunately it begins in the passive voice. The passive voice, as you will recall, is a device which every high school composition teacher strives to guide students away from. This paragraph also mistakes a lack of basic understanding for a "basic lack of understanding." What is a basic lack of understaning? Is it something which aspires to one day be an advanced lack of understanding? Multiple choice question: Which of the two sorts of lack of understanding does this compositional error represent? Of course we can generously overlook these.failures given that this post shows no signs of being, say, a diatribe against poor English. Could it be a slightly more educated Nigerian scammer, with sets of better stolen pics, who is behind this head-shaking increase of those saying they are "a dominate"? Hmmm. The focus of the post has curiously shifted from a comment on lack of self-understanding to a complaint about English usage, or about cranial wobbliness in a certain subset of the population. The Amish-esque grammar here leaves this interesting question unsettled. Short answer question: Do you find this complaint amusing in this context?. Tsk tsk. Or, are our schools really getting this bad? I suppose this is a fair question. Anyways, rock on. wit ur bad self. How many times in this thread has the adjective "submissive" been used as a noun? Why are we not tearing hair and gnashing teeth about that error? Partly, I think, because in English rules follow usage. We appreciate this when we are not lodged uncomfortably up on our high horses. As it happens, and the nounification of "submissive" has been going on for two or three days longer than the nounification of dominate. Submissive, used as a noun, is no longer a clear cut case of an error. Given the prevalence of the "error" it is even now being reclassified as acceptable usage by lexicographers as well as by those posting to this thread. I wonder how long it will take for this to happen to the noun "dominate". I think the noun "dominate" is ugly. I don't see that it arises from anything particularly good or worthwhile. I would like to see less and less of it. I think the noun "dominate" has a good deal in common with this thread. Four points extra credit: Find the spelling, punctuation, grammar and vocabulary errors in this post. Or call in the glazier for some remedial work on your house.
|