RE: Gorean's??? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Padriag -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 12:19:41 PM)

Well.... yes and no...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

quote:

....I saw it in one individual who incorporated bushido code and the behavior of the samurai (right down to how his home was decorated and even how he dressed, ate, and behaved at home) into his "BDSM lifestyle." 


A very good comparison.  Leaving the BDSM out completely, that sort of thing, like coming to work and insisting on being addressed by one's SCA rank, or sending memos around the office in Klingon, is exactly the sort of 'missing the point' behavior that seems to some to exemplify certain Goreans.

True... there are those, and not just among Goreans but among BDSM, the SCA, and just about any other group... including even the Boy Scouts... who seem to believe that by adopting the outward appearance of something, they become that something.  The ones who are worst for doing so are generally those who desparately want to be somebody... and so they adopt some persona they feel empowers them and makes them feel good about themself.

But...


quote:

They were samurai because that is who they were innately...and to quote Charlie Wood...you can't teach that stuff.

Actually, they were samurai because of their social station... and they very much were taught how to behave and so forth.  What really prevents anyone from genuinely being a samurai today is that there is no social institution to legitmately create them... feudal Japan no long exists, and with it went the samurai.

quote:

No matter how many topknots one puts in their hair, or how many kenjutsu lessons they take, or how many trips to the mall they make in a kimono, or how many meals they eat sitting on the floor, they are never going to be samurai, and they are not going to actually be living bushido.

I agree, they won't be samurai.  However... they could be living according to bushido.  Bushido was nothing more than a code of behavior.  This code, first formalized in the Bushido Shoshinshu (literally, Bushido for Beginners) by Taira Shigesuke sometime in the mid 1600s (actually nearing the end of the reign of the samurai ironically enough), covered everything from how a samurai should eat, live, manage his household, treat his wife, his children, his responsibilities and duties, how to behave on the battlefield... and even how to die.

Using the Bushido Shoshinshu as an analogy to Gor is useful in another way.  Just as the Bushido code covers far more than just fighting and martial pursuits... Gor (at least as embodied by what Bull refers to as "living Goreans") involves more than just sex, slaves, fetishes and kinks; this being one of the main points of contention Goreans have about being lumped in with BDSM.  The individual I referenced didn't believe he was a samurai, outside his home he dressed "normally", at work he was just one of the guys.  But, even at work or elsewhere he tried to behave according to what the Bushido Shoshinshu taught, not because of any delusion, but because he genuinely admired and respected it.  He felt it made him a better person.  I see some Goreans attempting to do the same with Gor.  So we have some who are definitely trying to use Gor as a means of escaping into a fantasy world, but there are also others who are trying to bring something respectable out of that fantasy world.

Personally, I think most of these living Goreans would be better off with a copy of Bushido Shoshinshu, or Nietzsche's collected works, or a good history textbook on Scandinavian culture, etc.  I say that chiefly because its far easier for most people to take seriously someone trying to adopt a code of behavior and ethics drawn from history, than one drawn from badly written fiction.  That was point behind my little joke previously regarding "Nietzscheans".  If a group formed and claimed to live by the teachings of Nietzsche, others might think them odd, but could at least give them some credibility because Nietzsche was both a real philosopher and one who was very influential in his time.  On the other hand, a group claiming to follow the teachings of "Nietzscheans" taken from a B grade TV series... not so credible.

quote:

On the other hand, one can read Jack Rinella, Gloria Brame, Jay Wiseman, John Warren, et al. and go 'Hey...there are others out there that feel the same as I do'...because innately, like the samurai, one is either kinky or they are not.

Except that being kinky isn't innate anymore than being a samurai is.  Being a samurai or minor french nobility were both social stations granted by particular cultural institutions.  Being kinky is something we choose.  I wasn't kinky as a child, that didn't develop until sometime in my adult life.  Likewise my kinks have changed, I've lost interest in some and learned new ones.  So to some extent, if one can read Jay Wisemen and say "Hey, that's cool, I wanna do that," is really no different than someone reading Bushido Shoshinshu and saying "Hey, that's cool, I wanna try living like that."  How well they do it, or learn any of it, is another question... but anyone could read either and decide to try... both can be learned, both can be taught.




Justme696 -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 12:46:00 PM)

What  I find funny is...people like to take high goals..like living like a samurai...but do you cut your belly open when you disappoint or fail? (yes I know absurd remark)
It is easy to read and say I live like this and that....but we will never know how it was then. And besides that..the samurai.....ended also because of themselfs...clinging to the past. So they are not that perfect




Padriag -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 12:58:00 PM)

If perfection is the only measure of success, then we are all failures.  Better to have high ideals and still fall short, than to have low or no ideals.  For even if one aims high and fails to hit the mark, one will still shoot farther than those who never aimed high at all.

There are many things about Gor and Goreans I find disagreeable.  But still, whether its a Gorean trying to live a philosophy taken from works of fiction, or someone trying to live a modern interpretation of bushido... if their intent is to aim high, that much at least I can respect.




Vestonika -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:01:09 PM)

To be a *!*Gorean *!* is to adhere to "Gorean Slavery" as a PROCESS.

THAT IS THE ONLY CENTRAL UNIFYING CORE.
THAT IS THE ONLY REASON IT FIGURES INTO BDSM.

Imagine the PROCESS of "Gorean Slavery" as a naked Xmas tree... from there you can decorate it with any ornaments you like, some perennial favorites include: chewing out, speeches, sermons, lectures, tirades, rants and raves, getting on one's soapbox, disturb, torment, plague, bother, bug, distress, irritate, attack, intimidate, and persecute.

Everything else beyond "Gorean Slavery" as a PROCESS is either:

1. confession, (i.e. sharing your feelings, getting it off your chest)
2. indulgence, (i.e. extravagant wish-fulfillment)
3. indefinite, (i.e. ambiguous, inexact, vague, unknown, ill-defined)

BEYOND THE PROCESS IT IS ANYTHING YOU WANT IT TO BE.




Aswad -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:04:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

This simple fact is why I've always wondered why there is a separate Gor forum here rather than a separate Gor forum on some philosophy board somewhere.


Two good reasons off the top of my head:

¹ A lot of Goreans do engage in BDSM, and since their paradigm is different, it just creates a lot of noise whenever somebody wants to debate as if the topic were in the context of SSC or RACK. This has been given as one of the reasons why (e.g.) Ghita sometimes hangs out there. Elsewhere, answers tend to include a bunch of stuff that is simply beside the point in this paradigm. You've probably noticed that there are a fair number of threads there dealing with slavery etc.

² As a site that does not have an agenda that relates to any particular view of, or interpretation of, the Gorean philosophy, it serves as a pretty good neutral ground for Goreans. As Bull pointed out, this isn't a place that enforces a specific interpretation with static group-think. Most sites who style themselves as Gorean sites tend to either be BDSM sites that use customs from the books, or sites that have just such a group-think approach and where there is very little open discussion or evolution of ideas.

Health,
al-Aswad.





Aswad -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:13:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kitttty

But then the whole Gor thing seems to imply a sexist universe where chickies are all meant to submit to the total authority of an owner.


Seems you're confusing the reactionist satire with literal truth. So do some who identify as Goreans. It's pretty silly in my opinion, and reflects an inability to be a dominant on one's own merits. Relying on B-class science fiction to justify some silly notion of male superiority is a sign of weakness, more than anything else. And that's not thought highly of in the Gorean paradigm, as far as I can tell. That opinion seems to be shared by several well-thought of posters.

Health,
al-Aswad.




Justme696 -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:14:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vestonika

To be a *!*Gorean *!* is to adhere to "Gorean Slavery" as a PROCESS.

THAT IS THE ONLY CENTRAL UNIFYING CORE.
THAT IS THE ONLY REASON IT FIGURES INTO BDSM.

Imagine the PROCESS of "Gorean Slavery" as a naked Xmas tree... from there you can decorate it with any ornaments you like, some perennial favorites include: chewing out, speeches, sermons, lectures, tirades, rants and raves, getting on one's soapbox, disturb, torment, plague, bother, bug, distress, irritate, attack, intimidate, and persecute.

Everything else about "Gorean Slavery" as a PROCESS is either:

1. confession, (i.e. sharing your feelings, getting it off your chest)
2. indulgence, (i.e. extravagant wish-fulfillment)
3. indefinite, (i.e. ambiguous, inexact, vague, unknown, ill-defined)

BEYOND THE PROCESS IT IS ANYTHING YOU WANT IT TO BE.


I don't get what you try to tell me?

(btw I am Gorean, just the sugar free kind)




Justme696 -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:19:12 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

If perfection is the only measure of success, then we are all failures.  Better to have high ideals and still fall short, than to have low or no ideals.  For even if one aims high and fails to hit the mark, one will still shoot farther than those who never aimed high at all.

There are many things about Gor and Goreans I find disagreeable.  But still, whether its a Gorean trying to live a philosophy taken from works of fiction, or someone trying to live a modern interpretation of bushido... if their intent is to aim high, that much at least I can respect.


you make good points...agree




orfunboi -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:19:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: camille65

Well one difference is that they don't (for the most part) engage in S/m.


I never heard that before. I only know a few houses in real life that are Gorean, and they all engage in S/m. Maybe they are odd in that.




Aswad -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:19:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

If one is attempting to identify with 'Gor', the proper term would be 'Gorist', or possibly 'Gorite'.


Except a convention has already been established. That said, I'd love to see the lifestyle crowd changing the convention to distinguish themselves more clearly from the RP crowd. FWIW, the term Normanist is occasionally used to describe those who follow Norman, rather than identifying with the principles and/or conventions described in the Gor books. The former group are generally humanists of a sort, at least as regards morals and philosophy, while the latter group are not humanist in inclination.

Health,
al-Aswad.




Paulsgirl -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:20:19 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

A very good comparison.  Leaving the BDSM out completely, that sort of thing, like coming to work and insisting on being addressed by one's SCA rank, or sending memos around the office in Klingon, is exactly the sort of 'missing the point' behavior that seems to some to exemplify certain Goreans.

The samurai didn't get to be samurai by mimicking the decor, food, dress, and so forth of something they read about that was completely foreign to their culture and upbringing.
They didn't develop their adherence to codes by sitting around trying to catch flies with chopsticks, and grunting like someone from a movie about samurai.
They were samurai because that is who they were innately...and to quote Charlie Wood...you can't teach that stuff.

No matter how many topknots one puts in their hair, or how many kenjutsu lessons they take, or how many trips to the mall they make in a kimono, or how many meals they eat sitting on the floor, they are never going to be samurai, and they are not going to actually be living bushido.

IMHO, the same applies to reading about another culture that defines 'honor' according to behaviors and concepts like homestones and tarn strikes, and attempting to incorporate it into one's environment.

Someone has either accomplished a tarn strike or they haven't...either they've killed another man with a sword over homestones, or they haven't...and either they are innately honorable, or they aren't. 
You can't just read it in a book, and claim 'Oh yeah...that's me, right there!'

And I believe that anyone in the BDSM side of things who named their home 'Roissy', and pretended to be minor French nobility, and called their sub 'O' while making her wear an owl mask to the store would be seen as similarly not getting it.

On the other hand, one can read Jack Rinella, Gloria Brame, Jay Wiseman, John Warren, et al. and go 'Hey...there are others out there that feel the same as I do'...because innately, like the samurai, one is either kinky or they are not.


i bow and applaud you.....extremely well said........




Aswad -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:22:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

All the above is great stuff, none of it was invented (other than the mythical planet) by Norman and none of it is unique to Gor, however, as a cohesive worldview, it is.  I actually like much of the above as broad concepts I just don't like the rigidity around certain things such as the women born to submit bit and the dismissal of male submissives.


Quite agree on all points. The above bears repeating.

Health,
al-Aswad.




Paulsgirl -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:23:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aswad

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

If one is attempting to identify with 'Gor', the proper term would be 'Gorist', or possibly 'Gorite'.


Except a convention has already been established. That said, I'd love to see the lifestyle crowd changing the convention to distinguish themselves more clearly from the RP crowd. FWIW, the term Normanist is occasionally used to describe those who follow Norman, rather than identifying with the principles and/or conventions described in the Gor books. The former group are generally humanists of a sort, at least as regards morals and philosophy, while the latter group are not humanist in inclination.

Health,
al-Aswad.


i'm lost sorry.......i got a few degrees and the paperwork to show it BUT convergent norms like those you describe? if i need convergent norms of behaviour i may as well get a good book on vanilla......




Aswad -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:24:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

Gor is a kinky version of Ayn Rand and in that sense, yes, it is a belief system but it certainly isn't unique in being one.


One of the closest hits I've seen so far, although Rand was more of a humanist inclination.

I once described it as Evolutionary/Naturalist Objectivism, which seems somewhat apt.

Health,
al-Aswad.




Justme696 -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:27:26 PM)

isn't in the bible the female submissive to the male too...throw in some sodom and gamorra...wars........add a planet
and we have the gor books as kinky bible?




Paulsgirl -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:45:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

isn't in the bible the female submissive to the male too...throw in some sodom and gamorra...wars........add a planet
and we have the gor books as kinky bible?

i agree and am tempted to start on the sociological/psychological role of Norman's book(s)...but i won't as enough can be already googled on the psychological/sociological need for conformity and obedience to authority as it is and there are Upanishads, Torah, Holy Bible (New and Old Testaments) and Koran which did it long before.......IMPO Gor is a post-modernist religion and i don't do that type of consensuality.
PS hope Gor doesn't have a post-modernist form of Fatwah otherwise I'm fucked





Vestonika -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:48:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vestonika

To be a *!*Gorean *!* is to adhere to "Gorean Slavery" as a PROCESS.

THAT IS THE ONLY CENTRAL UNIFYING CORE.
THAT IS THE ONLY REASON IT FIGURES INTO BDSM.

Imagine the PROCESS of "Gorean Slavery" as a naked Xmas tree... from there you can decorate it with any ornaments you like, some perennial favorites include: chewing out, speeches, sermons, lectures, tirades, rants and raves, getting on one's soapbox, disturb, torment, plague, bother, bug, distress, irritate, attack, intimidate, and persecute.

Everything else about "Gorean Slavery" as a PROCESS is either:

1. confession, (i.e. sharing your feelings, getting it off your chest)
2. indulgence, (i.e. extravagant wish-fulfillment)
3. indefinite, (i.e. ambiguous, inexact, vague, unknown, ill-defined)

BEYOND THE PROCESS IT IS ANYTHING YOU WANT IT TO BE.


I don't get what you try to tell me?

(btw I am Gorean, just the sugar free kind)


The GOR books describe the PROCESS of "Gorean Slavery."
The "Story of O" describes the PROCESS of "Roissy Slavery."

You don't have to be from France, the nobility, from the Planet Gor, or wear castoff SCA costumes while you circle your RV's around a vacant lot in Oklahoma... to practice either form of "EROTIC SLAVERY."

ALL THERE IS... IS THE PROCESS YOU CHOOSE TO UTILIZE.

Everything beyond that is IRRELEVANT to the PROCESS.

It's like Rock n' Roll... wearing the T-shirt DOES NOT make you a rocker.

FEELING the music in your soul and rocking out to it MAKES YOU A ROCKER.




Justme696 -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 1:53:17 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Paulsgirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Justme696

isn't in the bible the female submissive to the male too...throw in some sodom and gamorra...wars........add a planet
and we have the gor books as kinky bible?

i agree and am tempted to start on the sociological/psychological role of Norman's book(s)...but i won't as enough can be already googled on the psychological/sociological need for conformity and obedience to authority as it is and there are Upanishads, Torah, Holy Bible (New and Old Testaments) and Koran which did it long before.......IMPO Gor is a post-modernist religion and i don't do that type of consensuality.
PS hope Gor doesn't have a post-modernist form of Fatwah otherwise I'm fucked




propably fucked without FAtwah  :P




Alumbrado -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 2:26:00 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Padriag

Well.... yes and no...

True... there are those, and not just among Goreans but among BDSM, the SCA, and just about any other group... including even the Boy Scouts... who seem to believe that by adopting the outward appearance of something, they become that something.  The ones who are worst for doing so are generally those who desparately want to be somebody... and so they adopt some persona they feel empowers them and makes them feel good about themself.

But...

(Snipped)

Except that being kinky isn't innate anymore than being a samurai is.  Being a samurai or minor french nobility were both social stations granted by particular cultural institutions.  Being kinky is something we choose.  I wasn't kinky as a child, that didn't develop until sometime in my adult life.  Likewise my kinks have changed, I've lost interest in some and learned new ones.  So to some extent, if one can read Jay Wisemen and say "Hey, that's cool, I wanna do that," is really no different than someone reading Bushido Shoshinshu and saying "Hey, that's cool, I wanna try living like that."  How well they do it, or learn any of it, is another question... but anyone could read either and decide to try... both can be learned, both can be taught.


Thank you for an extremely useful addition to real discourse on the matter.  
I think we will find the word 'innate' fits two contravening notions in these examples, I was pretty much using it to mean 'born into', at which point all the manuals on bushido, etc, are part of one's cutural reality. As far as kink, since it incorporates sexuality, there is probably a better term than innate, because we recognize our 'who we are' for that later in life.

Books on Gor, bushido, or the Doctrina de los Cavalleros, etc, will still remain to me a very limited (albeit wonderful) window that can only present a facsimile of something one can never by birth, be.

Which means they should probably be enjoyed, rather than taken so seriously as to be called a lifestyle...[:D]




Alumbrado -> RE: Gorean's??? (2/24/2008 2:27:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Paulsgirl

.......IMPO Gor is a post-modernist religion and i don't do that type of consensuality.
PS hope Gor doesn't have a post-modernist form of Fatwah otherwise I'm fucked




If you smell dinosaur poop, run!




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875