Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: seperate munches?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: seperate munches? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: seperate munches? - 2/28/2008 5:25:07 PM   
christine1


Posts: 6155
Joined: 12/15/2007
From: i'm headed to HIM...
Status: offline
heh, i think i'll show up to one of those youngsters munches and see what they think of this old bag....

_____________________________

i am woman! er, godzilla! hear me roar!

http://wavcentral.com/cgi-bin/log/log.cgi?id=2856&sound=/sounds/movies/godzilla/roar.mp3


He's the "boom" overwhelming...

He is my Master, my lover, my best friend my everything.

(in reply to Dnomyar)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: seperate munches? - 2/28/2008 5:27:11 PM   
AquaticSub


Posts: 14867
Joined: 12/27/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Constrictor1

I just read on anther thread( and have experienced this locally), but I am having trouble understanding the seperate by age munches. There are the "regular" munches and then there are the TNG (The Next Generation ages 18-35) munches. Why are we segregating?

Constrictor1


In no particular order...

1. Some older members of the loose collection of people involved in BDSM (henceforth refered to as "community" for sake of simplicity) really look down on the younger folks.
2. Letting anyone in under 21 is a risk for the group.
3. Those under 21 want a group where they can meet.
4. Some of the younger members of the community aren't all that interested in meeting up with older folks or may outright want to avoid them due to bad experiences.
5. Groups will always have different focuses - some focus on play, others on chatting and friendship, others on particular types of relationships, others on age.

_____________________________

Without my dominance you cannot submit. Without your submission I cannot dominate. You are my equal in this, though our roles are different.-Val

It was ok for him to beat me but then he tried to cuddle me! - Me

Member:Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair

(in reply to Constrictor1)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: seperate munches? - 2/28/2008 5:49:36 PM   
Paulsgirl


Posts: 249
Joined: 2/15/2008
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lumus

quote:

ORIGINAL: Paulsgirl

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lumus


What kind of hell do you think I would raise at these younger parties?   Twelve years since I first tried the 'lifestyle', and I wasn't actively Dominant for half the time; however, I've comfortably held my own up to this point. 


with respect try holding someone else's i hear it's all the rage these days.....



Ok, this was cute.



i know you think it's cute and that's probably why you want to hold onto it....mine's cute as well but i do give it up......what the thread about btw?


_____________________________

Formerly Prinsexx

~There came a time when the risk to remain tight in the bud was more painful than the risk it took to blossom.~
Anais Nin

(in reply to Lumus)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: seperate munches? - 2/28/2008 6:24:02 PM   
Lumus


Posts: 5968
Joined: 9/16/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: christine1

heh, i think i'll show up to one of those youngsters munches and see what they think of this old bag....


You'd knock em dead, kiddo.  Now stop beating yourself, someone else might want to for a change!



_____________________________

<Talk to educate; listen to learn.>

~ the other half of "L&L" ~

I have been dubbed the Rainmaker. Do not make me take your water for my tribe.

(in reply to christine1)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: seperate munches? - 2/28/2008 9:02:37 PM   
SailingBum


Posts: 3225
Joined: 12/10/2007
From: Sailin the stormy sea
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: christine1

heh, i think i'll show up to one of those youngsters munches and see what they think of this old bag....


I off to get a fake ID


BadOne

_____________________________

The beatings will continue until morale improves.

According to SwithNSpanky
We are all so very lucky to have you with us to impart your great wisdom.

(in reply to christine1)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: seperate munches? - 2/28/2008 9:18:41 PM   
ShaktiSama


Posts: 1674
Joined: 8/13/2007
Status: offline
Hee hee.  I am too old to go to the whippersnapper munch!  That is hilarious.

All of this nonsense makes me a lot less sad that I haven't been to a munch in ages. 

_____________________________

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea."
-- Robert A. Heinlein

(in reply to Lumus)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 5:16:07 AM   
Dnomyar


Posts: 7933
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
offers to munch on christine. will even bring the tenderizer.

(in reply to ShaktiSama)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 5:45:30 AM   
Volcano


Posts: 22
Joined: 7/8/2004
Status: offline
We haven't had one of these groups pop up in San Antonio yet, so far as I know. 

This reminds me of something I posted to a certain Usenet group (mumble) years ago on the occasion of my 36th birthday. 

quote:

 Too Damned Old.

Yep, that's right, I am now officially old. Having reached the ripe old age of 36, my ancient carcass is now barred from attending events hosted by dozens of BDSM groups across the country. I am referring, of course, to the various "The Next Generation"-type groups that have been popping up almost everywhere lately, most of which have an upper age limit of 35.

When I first got out into the scene 6 years ago, I was among the youngest members of the local groups. How did I go from being a youngster to being a dirty old man in just 6 years?  But I can accept that these kids want some place where they can get away from old folks like us. The problem is, what do us old folks do when our younger friends are away at their TNG meetings?

I propose a new network of groups for us more seasoned folk: Cantankerous Aged Senile Kinksters Exploring Together, or CASKET. With a minimum age of 36, it will give us a place to gather without having to deal with all those damned unruly kids running around all over the place and making us wish we had the internet at that age. I recommend that CASKET meetings be held at the same time as, but at a different location from, the nearest TNG meeting. We can get together and discuss the aches and pains incurred by trying to keep up with younger partners. We can organize a lobbying effort for senior discounts at play parties. Or we can just sit around and bitch about being old. We can have all sorts of fun.

"Back in my day, you actually had to talk face to face
with hundreds of people, uphill, in snow, in the hopes
of finding one that was kinky . . ." 

(in reply to Dnomyar)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 6:01:13 AM   
BlackPhx


Posts: 3432
Joined: 11/8/2006
Status: offline
Love it...and I remember those days...

poenkitten

(in reply to Volcano)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 6:09:19 AM   
Lashra


Posts: 4900
Joined: 2/9/2006
Status: offline
Thank goodness my sub is over 35 now he can come hang out with me in the oldster group. We can both share bibs, depends and staring at sagging boobs and asses. 

~Lashra


_____________________________

“We can never judge the lives of others, because each person knows only their own pain and renunciation. It's one thing to feel that you are on the right path, but it's another to think that yours is the only path.”






(in reply to BlackPhx)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 6:18:32 AM   
Dnomyar


Posts: 7933
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
Makes note to self. Self stay away from Lashra's munchie. Don't want to share what size depends do you wear.

(in reply to Lashra)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 6:21:57 AM   
Lashra


Posts: 4900
Joined: 2/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Dnomyar

Makes note to self. Self stay away from Lashra's munchie. Don't want to share what size depends do you wear.

Hey don't be dissin my kink! we buy a size 5x depends and both get inside of it. Saves on money from the social security check and works as humilation for him because he has to be behind me like the ass part of a duo in a donkey suit.

~Lashra


_____________________________

“We can never judge the lives of others, because each person knows only their own pain and renunciation. It's one thing to feel that you are on the right path, but it's another to think that yours is the only path.”






(in reply to Dnomyar)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 6:39:44 AM   
Dnomyar


Posts: 7933
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
Mmmm I think that he is getting the better deal being behind you in the donkey suit. Lmao the things he could do with a vibrator back there.

(in reply to Lashra)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 6:58:07 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Archer

Clubs make the cut off at 21 because news media will sensationalize the headlines at every opportunity.
If the police raid a club and they find 6 people between 18 and 19 what will the headlines read?
TEENS found in SM Sexclub Raid.
It won't matter if nobody was having sex because the rules forbid it
It won't matter that the "Teens" were all of legal age to consent
The only thing that will matter is that the population of the town will be thinking that the club is full of sick pedophiles looking to torture and rape the local schoolgirls. And the city will shut them down.

It's a sad commentary that they have to be this defenssive but they have their reasons.





That would work if ALL clubs and organizations did that. Not all do.

I don't find fear of what might happened to be an acceptable reason for me and like I said I won't go to those groups who practice that discrimination if I find out they have that restriction.

The fact is that the age of consent for sexual activities in the USA is at least 18 everywhere I know of. The age of consent to marriage is similar as is to join the military or vote or many other adult things.

For some of us these are reasons enough to not support groups and munches that ban people under 21.

I've organized and managed munches, play parties, and educational groups. I understand the concerns but I don't find that acceptable to me because I know you can deal with those worried with a bit of education and care.

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 7:02:41 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lumus

I'm not aware of any segregation in my neck of the woods. Given the ages bandied about though, it makes me wonder...

...since I'm 35.

Anyone who's got a glimpse into who I am [and even if you haven't, join in the fun]:

What kind of hell do you think I would raise at these younger parties? Twelve years since I first tried the 'lifestyle', and I wasn't actively Dominant for half the time; however, I've comfortably held my own up to this point. I'd be more mature than a good number of the younger Dom-boys, I've no doubt, and it's been inferred that I tease well.

Conversely, I'm too young for the "other category", even though a 50-year-old man might have only just entered the 'lifestyle'. WTF?

*snickers* Can't help but laugh at the age thing; it does not apply to me in the least, and yet, the havoc....ahh, the havoc.




I used to have these same thoughts, Lumus.

I helped a college/university group form, I helped host then hosted a city munch, I was active in a big BDSM group -- all well before 30. No one batted an eye at me or didn't allow me to help -- perhaps they sensed I'd be one of the few willing to do the work and goodness knows that is always needed.

But I did get to hear lots of negative talk about younger people, meaning under 40 really, and I always gave folks a look and if I was feeling bitchy I'd point out just how under 40 I was. That usually made them blush in embarrassment but rather than admit they might have an age issue they'd usually say "well you're so mature though" or "except you and Tom of course"/

*rolls eyes*

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to Lumus)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 7:19:50 AM   
Dnomyar


Posts: 7933
Joined: 6/27/2005
Status: offline
The age of consent to marry varies from state to state. I married my ex when she was 16. I know that some states were lower at the time.

(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 7:50:13 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Dnomyar

The age of consent to marry varies from state to state. I married my ex when she was 16. I know that some states were lower at the time.


Yes... thus the reason I said "The fact is that the age of consent for sexual activities in the USA is at least 18 everywhere I know of. The age of consent to marriage is similar as is to join the military or vote or many other adult things." Please note the word "at least 18 everywhere" -- perhaps I didn't state it perfectly but I don't know of a place today in 2008 in the USA where you must be older than 18 to get married or consent to sexual activities of some types or the other things I mentioned.

Does that clear it up?

Age and the law is a very weird dynamic I think. Historically it has been so as well and the justifications for one age vs. another are interesting but at the end seem like just that, justifications.

For example, again from my own family, my mother could marry in 1948 at the age of 18 but my father couldn't marry until 21 unless he got his mother's signature. Returning vets from WWII were pretty pissed and got that law changed -- let a "boy" go into the service where he could die or come back a different person emotionally and psychologically if not physical and then tell him he needs his mommy and/or daddy's permission to marry his "girl", I'd have been damned pissed too.

The justifications for that law was that girls matured faster and yet the reason that only men could serve on juries was that women were too emotional -- that always makes my head spin.

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to Dnomyar)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 8:01:44 AM   
SubbieOnWheels


Posts: 590
Joined: 12/14/2007
Status: offline
Perhaps another reason the age limit is 21 is that at some activities, probably not restaurant-type munches, but play parties, etc., drinking is acceptable. And in many states, 21 is the legal drinking age. (Some states lowered it and then raised it again when drunk-driving incidents increased - don't know if they decreased afterwards.) Even if the under-21 attendees did not drink, the public perception, should the activity come to public notice, is that these "underage" people were "exposed" to liquor.

_____________________________

Bethical
Beat me, strike me, take away my reindeer! I'll never tell! -- Walt Kelly, Pogo Possum
I yam what I yam - Popeye

http://www.myspace.com/bethical_wheels


(in reply to thetammyjo)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: seperate munches? - 2/29/2008 9:32:49 AM   
thetammyjo


Posts: 6322
Joined: 9/8/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: SubbieOnWheels

Perhaps another reason the age limit is 21 is that at some activities, probably not restaurant-type munches, but play parties, etc., drinking is acceptable. And in many states, 21 is the legal drinking age. (Some states lowered it and then raised it again when drunk-driving incidents increased - don't know if they decreased afterwards.) Even if the under-21 attendees did not drink, the public perception, should the activity come to public notice, is that these "underage" people were "exposed" to liquor.


That is a justification that is used; I've heard it often.

Personally I won't go to a munch in a bar or a playparty where alcohol is served so that justification isn't a factor for events I'd attend myself.

Trust me folks, having dealt with college/university groups for many years, I have heard all the justifications. Sharing them with me isn't going to change my mind about them but then I'm not trying to change yours just sharing my personal opinion and the reasons why I don't support some munches, some clubs and some groups.

_____________________________

Love, Peace, Hugs, Kisses, Whips & Chains,

TammyJo

Check out my website at http://www.thetammyjo.com Or www.tammyjoeckhart.com

And my LJ where I post fiction in progress if you "friend" me at http://thetammyjo.livejournal.com/

(in reply to SubbieOnWheels)
Profile   Post #: 99
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: seperate munches? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.125