SixFootMaster -> RE: Curious: why so many male doms (3/4/2008 9:50:46 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BitaTruble quote:
ORIGINAL: SixFootMaster I expect a dominant - a genuine dominant, not merely someone who likes being in control or abusive - of either gender to be perfectly capable of admitting fault or error, or even keeping an open mind. I expect that same behavior from any adult, be they dominant, slave, switch, vanilla, cookies and cream or something else. That said, I also expect an adult who does not believe they've made an error or are actually at fault to refrain from backing down just to keep the peace and just because someone else exhibits poor behavior does not give one an excuse to return like with like. It tends to lower the value of the surrounding real estate. Celeste Agreed, any adult - but dominants in particular, since it behooves us to be especially responsible, since we are the ones largely in control of a situation. I've got no problem with someone refusing to back down, and "sticking to their guns" - so long as it stays with the topic and doesn't degenerate into puerile name calling, denigration et al. Once it reaches that point the argument is lost, it doesn't matter how good your position was to start with. I'm verbose and opinionated and quite willing to discuss something till the metaphorical cows come home. I'm also happy to mutually "agree to disagree", but only if the other person is equally willing. I do expect people to read what I write, and not what they think I've written. For instance, I did not call Shakti an annoying little upstart, I pointed out that she has a penchance for treating people who disagree with her that way: quote:
Sorry, buckaroo. Equivocating is not equality. I treat others as I would like to be treated, for the most part. Y'all might wanna try doing the same. quote:
You want to be treated like inferior little upstart? Or is everything I've ever seen you write not part of the "for the most part"? Lady, you exude arrogance and condescension, and your replies are often circular and prejudiced. At least I'm honest enough to admit it. Now, I'm sure you'll agree, that's a fair enough cop. Likewise with the miscommunication issue with darkChylde, however, unlike Shakti, we were able to resolve that - and subsequently share a joke in another thread. Personally, I have no problem with insults - I've grown up in some rough and tumble country, and nothing this board has to offer will ever match that. "Boy-dom" doesn't worry me, nor do any of the other insults she has thrown around, and it is more amusing to me that she is willing to annihilate her own reputation rather than admit that she might have been perhaps just a little bit wrong, or at least not 100% correct. I don't treat forums as a game with a winner and a loser, it's now why I'm here, but it's patently obvious that some cannot avoid competing with their gender opposites. Still, if you're going to play a game of chess, at least know when to declare a stale-mate, and whatever you do, don't throw the bloody clock at the wall. Six. Edited to remove two excess "nows".
|
|
|
|