egelante -> RE: Empaths and Instant Reecognition (3/11/2008 7:02:42 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: lally3 i think there is an instinct in all of us, there has to be, we have moved a long way from the animal kingdom, but we are still equiped with the instincts that have made us as successful as we are. communication between each other without words and even communicating between ourselves and animals is possible through the global language of emotion. we can tell when someone/thing is happy, sad, curious, away with the fairies, etc., recognising each other is an interesting one. a week or so ago i had a curious experience with someone in a checkout que in waitrose. im still not sure if he was a Dom exactly, or whether he was just an enigmatic vanilla. i was already in the que and i became aware of someone standing behind me. he struck up an amusing conversation with the checkout person and i dunno, but there was something really compelling about him. when i looked (cautiously) over my shoulder at him he looked at me in such a way that made me instantly think, Dom. i still dont know if he was or not. but the smile he gave me was of someone who knew who he was and suspected he knew who i was too. well, even if it was my imagination, it was hot, so who cares! i think its possible, yes. like someone said earlier, you see someone in a crowd and you instantly know youll hit it off. its the instinct thing, friend or foe - our survival was built from it. lally Now, I am generally the one starting the amusing conversation with the checkout person... and so identify with this story from that side. I don't think that any casual observer in an ordinary situation like that would risk thinking me a submissive character - quite the opposite. But that is partly to do with social projection - a given set of traits being manifested to negotiate a given situation. And so, I know that I generally get friendlier service when I am calm, confident, and charming, when I make eye contact and smile quickly. I know that in the street, much the same applies: the world is a friendlier place if you approach it with bold amicability. Add that to the facts that I read people like I do books, and that I do have... presence, I suppose, for want of anything else to call it, and you have what appears to be a dominant person. Now put me in a situation where I have no clue what I am doing, and, unless I am feeling energetic and intellectually engaged, it's quite possible that I will become hesitant, needy, or obtuse. Quite a difference. And so what am I saying? well I'm not quite sure. I'm certainly not suggesting the "don't judge a book by it's cover" adage, but I'm trying to draw contextual considerations into your thoughts. I hope that you do not mind. And what am I? goodness knows - I certainly dare not claim that I do. From experience, I would say that it all depends on who the observer is what they want or are trained to see in me. Some see a switch, others a naturally gifted dominant, others a a 'fluffy dom', others a submissive with an inflated ego. I could introduce you to four people who know me reasonably well, and each would give you a different one of those based on their experience of me and their experience of other people.
|
|
|
|