RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Stephann -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/14/2008 5:54:05 PM)

Hi jen,

Having served overseas in the Marines, maintaining a relationship with a woman before there was an 'online' relationship, I'd like to think I do know a thing or two about long distance relationships.

Naturally, my situation has differences to theirs.  I might feel my sitaution wasn't 'comperable' but the truth is everything is comparable to a degree.  Your friends' story gives fuel to the fact that they needn't have a face to face relationship, for it to be a real and tangible one.  Not too many hundreds of years ago, sailors left wives behind for several years at a time while they served aboard a ship.  Is that comperable, because they didn't have an internet to keep in touch via?

The issue is nothing need be valid to anyone except to the people involved.  So long as the rules are clearly spelled out in advance, and everyone is comfy with those rules, it doesn't matter if people are having a relationship in person, computer, or smoke signal so long as that's a fulfilling relationship to the people involved.  My only beef with cyber relationships, is too often they are presented as 'online but eventually planning to meet' when one of the people never really intends to meet, or when one (or both) of the people involved are lying (about wives, jobs, geographical location, important details about their life, etc etc.)  I've had a great experience with every woman I've met in person on CM, both as lovers and friends.  But I've also had some pretty miserable experiences with women online who ultimately were living a fantasy world for weeks or months.  Two women come to mind who carried this facade for more than a year (something I learned a hard lesson from.)  I won't that mistake again.  But if someone walks into a munch, claiming to have 20 years experience, and clearly doesn't know dominance from his ass, and I later learn it's because it was 20 years of internet crap, I don't feel the need to tell him how little I value his experiences.  It's his sorry life, why should I care?

Stephan




msterfixer -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/14/2008 6:35:24 PM)

To be in the lifestyle, is just thst styling your life in it, can't hide your style or fashion.




LadyPact -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/14/2008 10:14:12 PM)

I think, again, it's apples and oranges.  In the cases of people being separated by circumstances, is something much different than people who have never met in person. 

For those of you who haven't already figured this out, deployment sucks.  My husband goes to Korea here in a couple of months.  My boy has 'unofficial' news of going back to the sandbox at the end of the year.  No member of this family is happy about it, but it is what they chose when they signed up.  W/we won't be less of a family when on three different continents, but started as a family here, together. 

You'd kind of have to know Me to know how important that word "family" really is.




Real_Trouble -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/14/2008 10:45:54 PM)

Am I the only person here seriously considering if the OP is a troll or not?

I think it should be fundamentally evident that holding idealogically dogmatic beliefs about subjective experiences is somewhat foolish (this may be an understatement).  In short, condemning someone for their particular preferences, so long as those preferences are not doing active harm to others (and we're not discussing something like non-consenual acts here), is like becoming ragingly angry at an individual because of their favorite color.

More so, someone who responds to the supported beliefs of others with "yeah, whatever" or some variant thereof is, on average, wrong.  I don't mean this to be insulting, but I'm going to call a spade a spade here; you cannot dismiss someone by simply denigrating them.  Ad Hominem attacks and refusal to discuss are generally the signs that someone is wrong and losing an argument.  

There are even some good points, but they are obscured by the disgusting rhetoric.  I mean, in my case, I certainly believe that real life is hugely more satisfying than online, but I am neither all people nor so arrogant as to believe I can be the arbiter of all possible tastes and preferences.  This is also not to say strong opinions are bad.  I hold several myself.  It is to say that not knowing where one's sphere of influence ends is an issue.

To dissect something in particular I also spotted:

quote:

The very definitions of sadism and masochism and bondage demand physicality. Punishment and discipline mean nothing without the physical means to back it up.


Simply because you are not creative enough to understand that there are ways, beyond simply punching / whipping / otherwise physically assailing someone to inflict pain, humiliation, and assert control does not mean they don't exist.  I would argue, actually, that mental and social pain often carry a much higher impact and cost on individuals than many forms of physical pain, until we get into the true extremes involving maiming or death.

I mean, would most people rather be punched in the face or registered as a child molester?  There are definitely non-physical possibilities which inflict great harm.

Thus, in closing, I'm done browsing through this thread, so I will not darken it with my presence again; however, I suspect that the OP is a painfully dogmatic and unwilling to consider the validity of other points of view even in the face of extreme evidence, rather than actually being willing to change opinions in the face of real evidence, as was purported.  I say this because of the incessantly close-minded and confrontational approach to opposing viewpoints.  In my view, you are entitled to your own opinions, but not your own facts.  When you need the latter to make a case (and one almost always does when it comes to nothing more than preference), your argument has failed.




SaraZeal -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/15/2008 1:26:49 AM)

I personally think that real life is better than online, yes. But I don't diss online because it's a powerful and useful means of communicating. If I meet someone and then keep in touch on the phone, on the net, keep contact with friends from all over the place in the same way - it's not a waste of time to me. Doing only online sure, but who said it was *only* online anyway? I'd also rather get to know someone at least a little online, on the phone, before agreeing to meet in person or becoming owned by someone. Internet is also a great tool to research information, without it I'd know little or nothing about ageplay, diaperplay, Master/slave, TPE, even if I had interests in those.




MrSuperior -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/15/2008 1:29:52 AM)

Mr. Superior says:

A community embraces its own!  Fret not the silly people!  They are everywhere, and certainly not SUPERIOR!

Mr. Superior thinks you've got great chutzpah!





Justme696 -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/15/2008 5:01:01 AM)

You know what is funny.....from that real life...you post into the  online life. As soon as you post here...you are in both :P




faithfulfemme -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/16/2008 2:30:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real_Trouble


To dissect something in particular I also spotted:

quote:

The very definitions of sadism and masochism and bondage demand physicality. Punishment and discipline mean nothing without the physical means to back it up.


Simply because you are not creative enough to understand that there are ways, beyond simply punching / whipping / otherwise physically assailing someone to inflict pain, humiliation, and assert control does not mean they don't exist.  I would argue, actually, that mental and social pain often carry a much higher impact and cost on individuals than many forms of physical pain, until we get into the true extremes involving maiming or death.




i see this thread has been moving along quickly and with many different takes upon the thoughts that the OP has posed.  i think i've reached the tail-end of the dialogue, but will post my thoughts anyway. 

i agree with Real_Trouble in that boijen has not enough experience, or creativity, to understand that sadism, masochism and bondage do not require physicality.  Also, that punishment and discipline are entirely valid without the use of physical contact.

It is also my opinion that boijen is young enough to find glee in seeing so many people rushing to his/hys/her/hir (sorry, i'm not familiar with what pronouns you prefer) posts which cause so much clashing and clamoring among some of the ranks of those here at CM, myself included.  Don't think i shall participate in this type of dialogue again.    

So, being relatively new to the message boards, my experience with this thread has shown me that whenever i see that boijen is, again, an author of a thread i shall move on to the next one in hopes of finding a subject with a bit more substance.  

To each their own.....


.
 




BoiJen -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/16/2008 2:13:43 PM)

age card...again...blah!

When are you going to find a real arguement as to why I'm "wrong"?

"Age is the excuse people use when they don't have real evidence to support their opinions when faced with fact."...somebody said it but I can't remember who.

From the boi...who had an amazing time actually doing the BDSM thing last night...again...pics up soon 




SinergyNstrumpet -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/16/2008 3:32:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

age card...again...blah!

When are you going to find a real arguement as to why I'm "wrong"?

"Age is the excuse people use when they don't have real evidence to support their opinions when faced with fact."...somebody said it but I can't remember who.

From the boi...who had an amazing time actually doing the BDSM thing last night...again...pics up soon 


There are many times I agree with you, using the "age" card is inappropriate. There are many young people who post here that have well thought out and balanced points of view. The thing is, you have not addressed many here who substantially countered your opinions that seem to be based in a black and white dichotomy. It is one aspect of immaturity to view the world in such a narrow paradigm. Now youth is usually associated with immaturity, but some people never grow out of their misperceptions and erroneous views when presented with evidence contrary to the way they think.

Now I am not flaming you, but I will ask that instead of deriding those who suggest you sound immature, you might attempt to conduct yourself in a mature way and respond to those who have asked you questions...

My last one was what makes you more valid than any other person... still waiting....


julia




stella41b -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/16/2008 3:48:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

age card...again...blah!

When are you going to find a real arguement as to why I'm "wrong"?

"Age is the excuse people use when they don't have real evidence to support their opinions when faced with fact."...somebody said it but I can't remember who.

From the boi...who had an amazing time actually doing the BDSM thing last night...again...pics up soon 


You want to know why you're wrong?

Okay..

This 'community' is actually mainly different communities, both offline and online of many different people who are interested in the very broad spectrum of human interaction and behaviour which all falls under the umbrella term of BDSM.

I don't know about the others here but I for one have been cringing with acute embarrassment when reading some of your postings in this thread.

Why?

Please allow me to share with you part of my life from Poland in 2005. I'm publicly known in male gender as a leading playwright and stage director. Privately I'm, well, me. Lech Kaczynski is about to become the President, his party PiS (Law and Justice) form the government. They get into power on a homophobic ticket.

All over Poland there are marches and demonstrations known as Parada Rownosci - Equality Parades during which gays, lesbians and the transgendered in Poland take to the streets to demand equal rights. They are condemned by 6the Catholic Church in Poland, by people such as Father Tadeusz Rydzyk and his ultra-right wing Catholic fundamentalist radio station Radio Maryja as 'sexual deviants'. Those who are peacefully marching in cities such as Krakow and Lublin are attacked by a mob of hooligans. In Poznan in the west of Poland the police join in with the hooligans. In Krakow both police and hostile hooligans are hurling bricks and stones at gays, lesbians and the transgendered.

Lech Kaczynski was then the President of Warsaw. He had to bow to political pressure and also pressure from human rights groups to declare the 2005 Warsaw Equality Parade legal. It's October 2005. I've just had a successful production in the south of Poland, the national newspaper Gazeta Wyborcza has hailed me a successor to Jerzy Grotowski, the leading authority on modern theatre.

I decide to speak out in support of Polish gays, lesbians and transgendered. Not only do I decide to speak out in support of them, but I choose to come out publicly as myself, Stella, and announce to Poland via the media that I am a transgendered female, and from that moment on wish to be known as Stella.

I attended the Warsaw Equality Parade 2005 in person. I met with and spoke with the various public figures there, politicians, people from theatre, journalists, the media, but most of the time I spent with the gays and lesbians there on the street who had the guts and courage to come out publicly and declare openly that they weren't heterosexual. The paparazzi had a field day, I wasn't given any interview. My career, reputation, and whole life had been reduced to nothing.

Despite the attempts to find me accommodation and somewhere to sleep - as there was snow on the ground, it was below zero, and I was by then homeless and destitute, I had to sleep with the other homeless at Warsaw Central Station.

It's taken me over two years to get myself back off the streets and to reestablish myself in theatre.

This isn't fantasy or fiction, this is 'real' and fact. There are newspaper articles to back up what I write here.

You know, I'm so glad and happy that you can freely be yourself, that you can be a boi, a lesbian, interested and active both in the LGBT and BDSM communities. I mean this most sincerely from the bottom of my heart.

But you know, lots of people out there in the real world don't have that sort of freedom which you can enjoy. In many parts of the world you can be persecuted, attacked, oppressed, abused, and even killed just for being gay, lesbian, or indeed 'different'.

My life fell apart simply because I took the risk and chose to speak out in defence of Polish gays, lesbians and transgendered. Nobody asked me, I appointed myself as a leader and spokesperson for the entire community and decided to tell Polish society that it was wrong to discriminate against Poles simply because they were not heterosexual or "normal".

This was a very painful lesson I learned. I made the mistake of thinking that just because I was an authority on theatre that I could transfer this and become an authority on society. It was my own delusions of grandeur no less.

Like you I'm part of the LGBT community and also part of the BDSM community. My theatre is formed from people from both communities and openminded, tolerant heterosexuals.

I am not here to stand in judgment of you as a person. I take you at face value and accept you as you are. But please, take it from me, that you are wrong with regard to this thread.

You are wrong because you appear to have set yourself up as a spokesperson for all of us, a self-appointed leader, an example, and you have taken it upon yourself to dictate to the rest of us what is right and what is wrong.

Where are all the people who have asked you to speak on everybody's behalf and decide what is 'real' and what isn't, what is acceptable and what isn't?

If there aren't such people, then what does it matter to you what other people here do? Does it bother you in some way? Upset you?

Also you are wrong because you are crossing the line here. This is WIITWD, this is what people do in their own homes, or elsewhere, in their own time, between each other. We are talking here about a part of people's lives which is intimate, private, something which is done between consenting adults. No difference from two men sleeping together or two women. It's their affair, their matter.

However you deciding who is acceptable and who isn't on the basis of what they do in their private lives kind of smacks a little of hypocrisy, doesn't it?

Just be grateful that you're not living in a Stalinist society, because there would be no posting here and not much opportunity for real time play. People are dealing with enough oppression as it is without more coming from you via this part of the site. So please BoiJen, take the jackboots off, they're much too big for you. You go off and be happy in your play and scenes and leave others to be happy doing what they enjoy and what makes them happy.

Live and let live, eh?




night101owl -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/16/2008 7:14:18 PM)

Well, *I* know someone who is both a 9/11 widow and a survivor of Katrina, and they agree with me. That means, I see your Iraq soldier and raise you.

But really, I like to be caned and cut, on my ass. I'm going to have difficulty finding an online relationship that satisfied me, regardless of my dexterity and creativity.




LaTigresse -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/16/2008 7:23:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: night101owl

Well, *I* know someone who is both a 9/11 widow and a survivor of Katrina, and they agree with me. That means, I see your Iraq soldier and raise you.

But really, I like to be caned and cut, on my ass. I'm going to have difficulty finding an online relationship that satisfied me, regardless of my dexterity and creativity.


And your point is?




chellekitty -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/16/2008 11:54:40 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

age card...again...blah!

When are you going to find a real arguement as to why I'm "wrong"?

"Age is the excuse people use when they don't have real evidence to support their opinions when faced with fact."...somebody said it but I can't remember who.

From the boi...who had an amazing time actually doing the BDSM thing last night...again...pics up soon 


yes, i hate the age card to...but you know what, i haven't had it pulled on me in....i don't know how long - 6 months to a year? because i know how to admit when i have been talking out of my ass and i was ranting and didn't phrase it correctly...because i still do that...but admitting when i am wrong, even if it is just in presentation, is part of what i consider maturity...

it's not what you say, it's how you say it...from someone your own age...put your big girl panties on and get over yourself...oh yea, and stop shoving how you get to play soooo often in our faces, it doesn't make you any more real than anyone else...i haven't "played" since december when i had 30 needles weaved into my back and tortured (for some reason everyone left the room for the second part) and then a large cutting done on my thigh...no room for the whip to be used in the house and some jerks took up the outside stations and i have issues with bugs and being tied to a tree at night...

i don't know if that is real enough for you, but it is for me...just as my kinky-ness was real when i taught myself how to do self breast bondage and put clothespins on my nipples for the Doms on webcam...i wasn't part of any community at that time, stupid under 21 rules ( i was legal though)...and eventually in relationships...24/7 even...without being part of the community, because i was under 21...

but once i got that ID check and through the door...it was up to my personality and actions to carry me...not the date on my birth cirtificate...and most think i am older than i am, not because i am decrepit, but because i am mature...or so i have been told anyway...i still get carded for my cigs, if that says anything?

my point? the age discrimination sucks, i know - first hand, but if you don't shove your immaturity in people's face, they forget your age...

good luck,
chelle




BoiJen -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/17/2008 5:58:26 AM)

Firstly, I have never proclaimed to be a self appointed leader...not even of my own fan club. I've only stated my opinion as I see it. Having gone through the experience of being homeless and rejected by family and not even allowed a cance at my career of choice...has nothing to do with this thread...and I've done those things too.

Secondly, there are only few occassions I have ever had the age card pulled on me. At any "lifestyle" event...it's not ever been because of my opinions. Not in any event in the real world has this happened. In fact, because of being under 21 when I first started presenting there were many exceptions to the 21 and over rule made because of what I brought to the table. That includes my opinions. And often when speaking to people at these events I get "Wow...you're only how old?"

That's not to say the age card doesn't get pulled on me ever in the real world...it's just not for my opinions as I said. "You're too young to be complaining about bad joints." "Oh you can keep that kind of play up just because you're young. That'll change" Shit like that.

I do agree with Lady Pact...it really is apples and oranges between people who hole themselves up in their homes and never do anything other than fuck around on a computer. And people who are using the computer as a staple for a temporary part of time. Those same people will tell you the experiences are nothing alike.

Finally, I asked MsK what "chutzpah" was and She with big grin..."Somebody told you have it right? It's like saying you have balls....all dressed up and ready to go." So thanks! I know my opnions aren't popular at times...and that's not always a bad thing.

The Boi jen
"Let The Bodies Hit The Floor!!!"




Justme696 -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/17/2008 7:07:40 AM)

quote:

I know my opnions aren't popular at times...and that's not always a bad thing.


Aslong you can judge them with a clear mind, no..then they are not wrong.
And to accept others opinions also...is important too.
Counts for every one btw.




junecleaver -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/17/2008 10:15:14 AM)

quote:



ORIGINAL: chellekitty

it's not what you say, it's how you say it...from someone your own age...put your big girl panties on and get over yourself...oh yea, and stop shoving how you get to play soooo often in our faces, it doesn't make you any more real than anyone else...i haven't "played" since december when i had 30 needles weaved into my back and tortured (for some reason everyone left the room for the second part) and then a large cutting done on my thigh...no room for the whip to be used in the house and some jerks took up the outside stations and i have issues with bugs and being tied to a tree at night...


I think people twice our age still don't understand this concept.  They enjoy stating their opinions in a rude and ineffective way because it promotes drama.  And they LOVE drama.

Good post.






stella41b -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/17/2008 12:53:20 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Firstly, I have never proclaimed to be a self appointed leader...not even of my own fan club. I've only stated my opinion as I see it. Having gone through the experience of being homeless and rejected by family and not even allowed a cance at my career of choice...has nothing to do with this thread...and I've done those things too.



BoiJen, I know you've never intentionally proclaimed yourself to be a self-appointed leader, and you and I know that you've got far too much sense in your head to ever do that. That bit from my own life was only important to explain the context of the situation, but yes it had a lot to do with the thread because I was showing that I was wrong in doing the exact same thing and expressing my opinion on things that shouldn't concern me. I was the one who had spoken out so vehemently against Iraq, saying that the troops had no right to be there, and then I come out and start dictating to Poles over how they should think and how their society should be. A shining example of hypocrisy no less, don't you think?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

That's not to say the age card doesn't get pulled on me ever in the real world...it's just not for my opinions as I said. "You're too young to be complaining about bad joints." "Oh you can keep that kind of play up just because you're young. That'll change" Shit like that.



The age card argument is BS just exactly as the 'time served experienced' argument is BS. Experience doesn't always equate to knowledge, awareness or understanding. I got a 25 year old actress in my theatre who can act, and I mean really act, and she can act a lot better than many of the seasoned professional actors and actresses I've come across in my time. You see, experience doesn't take into account such things as intelligence, talent, that desire for knowledge, that burning desire deep inside to gather information and experience.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

I do agree with Lady Pact...it really is apples and oranges between people who hole themselves up in their homes and never do anything other than fuck around on a computer. And people who are using the computer as a staple for a temporary part of time. Those same people will tell you the experiences are nothing alike.



I disagree here, and I will explain why.

BDSM is NOT real life.

It's a role play, based on fantasy, a whole series of transactions based on human interaction between people.

You or Lady Pact having a scene is really no different from me and what I'm doing with my actors and actresses in rehearsal a couple of times a week.

Yes, Miriam the actress really does become Alison, the character in my play. She answers to the name of Alison, she speaks, thinks, moves, and behaves just like Alison would. But Alison here is really no more than a figment of my imagination written as a character in a play and when she leaves the stage there is no more Alison, there's just Miriam, a woman who just happens to be an actress.

And so too it's the same in BDSM, it's a role play, a game, a relationship with other people based on rituals, psychophysical activities, and a whole series of transactions, games, strokes, payoffs, actions and reactions.

You can be who you want to be here in BDSM, you can be a slave, you can be a switch, a Dom, you can call yourself Supreme Lord and Master, Sublime Mistress Goddess Whiplash, slave tiddles, whoever and whatever but at the end of the day when the scene ends you become Joe Bloggs, Jane Smith, whoever you were before you started playing.

Those people you claim are fucking about with a computer aren't fucking about with a computer at all - they're studying and learning about BDSM. Just as in the same way I have studied the theories and works of people such as Constantin Stanislavski, Peter Brook, Jerzy Grotowski, Anton Artaud, Meyerhold, Pavlov, Dr Eric Berne and his entire Transactional Analysis theories and revision of Freudian theory, Rudolf Steiner, and others.

We're dealing with human behaviour in its many different shapes and forms, and human interactions. It is a learning curve, a process of illusions, fantasies, examining those fantasies and illusions and finding out in both theory and practice what actually lies behind all those illusions and fantasies.  

The lifestyle isn't a separate entity, it never replaces real life, or it shouldn't, 'lifestyle' to me indicates someone who has decided to make an interest in BDSM and kink part of their lifestyle, irrespective of whether they are living it on a daily basis or only doing it once or twice a month with like-minded people.

The great beauty of BDSM is that you can take part, you can study it, read about it, talk about it, and whatever you do you learn - provided of course you are broadminded enough and open enough to actually learn something. Most people are, some people are not. This is why some of them spend years and years trying to find a suitable partner. Others spend years and years struggling to find a suitable partner who shares the same degree of knowledge and understanding which they do. Others spend a lot of time alone not because they're fantasists or 'fake' but because they're holding out and waiting for someone who accepts, understands and shares an interest in their particular kink or interests.

We are all human, we are all individuals, we all have different needs, different lifestyles, different sexual orientations, different philosophies on life, different needs, different experiences, different backgrounds, different desires, dreams, wants, different kinks, interests, passions, and motivations.

What is 'play' anyway? Isn't play merely practice, development? Isn't this where children learn to interact with each other and form relationships? And don't children play together through a variety of roles? Well yes, in my opinion, which is why millions of dolls houses, footballs, and cowboy, nurses, doctors, and policeman outfits, guns etc are sold in toy shops - simply so that children can play and they can play different roles and develop and learn.

This is the exact same thing as BDSM in my opinion. When we play we involve kink in our relationships, we openly share and express our needs to dominate, to submit, to inflict pain, to suffer humiliation, etc with another person whereas in a 'vanilla' relationship we wouldn't. We would just assume the missionary position, a bit of foreplay, and have done with it.

There's things here I don't understand, believe me. I don't understand for example why an adult woman would want to call her adult male partner Daddy. But you know, it's not for me to judge her for wanting to call her male partner Daddy, it's just part of their relationship and as long as they're happy together so what? I accept them for who they are and who they want to be. My opinion on what they do isn't of any value. I'm not that woman, I'm not her male partner, I'm not part of their relationship and I accept that they have just as much right to be here as I have.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoiJen

Finally, I asked MsK what "chutzpah" was and She with big grin..."Somebody told you have it right? It's like saying you have balls....all dressed up and ready to go." So thanks! I know my opnions aren't popular at times...and that's not always a bad thing.

The Boi jen
"Let The Bodies Hit The Floor!!!"


Here too I assume that people come here because they are interested in what other people are writing and posting on subjects which interest them. This is a forum where people can read and write on a wide variety of topics and people come here because they want to share their knowledge in some way, they want to know what other people think, either to confirm their own opinions and knowledge or to seek out and find out what other people think.

Yes it's great to 'have balls', I have them too, and to be able to post here on a wide variety of topics and share your opinions, views, knowledge and experiences with others. But I come here also to read what other people write to find out, to learn, and to deepen my knowledge and awareness, not just of BDSM but also in some cases of myself. It always comes as reassurance to find some people who share my opinions, but then again I'm not afraid to take up an unpopular stand and to contribute to a thread to give others my opinion and my insight. Nor am I afraid to admit that I'm wrong, because at the end of the day I can only learn, I can only find out, and I can only develop when I read what is written by those who don't share my opinion and who disagree with what I think on a particular topic.

This is why I come here, I come to share, to contribute, and to read, to learn, to examine critically what I think, and to understand things which I may not already understand. I come here to read, and I enjoy reading, postings and things written by other people, people such as LuckyAlbatross, yourself, Lady Pact, Lady Hathor, Domiguy, Dnamyar, Stephann, SimplyMichael, KnightofMists, Darcyandthedark, seeksfemslave, Politesub53, and others simply because I know these people and many others do not share my opinions or perspectives. These are people I can learn from, these are people who can give me insight.

I don't see this as a popularity contest. Not at all. If I wanted to be popular because of my opinions I would become a politician. I come here simply to share, to learn, to read, to discuss, to contribute, but most of all to share some of the interests with others which are found under the umbrella term of BDSM.

It's called having an open mind, and being grounded enough in reality to understand that the whole WIITWD, kink, BDSM, D/s and whatever else is only really just a part of someone's lifestyle and not get carried away into thinking it is a replacement or substitute for real life.




dwind62 -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/17/2008 1:05:54 PM)

I think some people that are in the "closet" about BDSM, for one reason or another.  it's what is down deep in your soul that matters. There are some people in the "Community" that are just as fake in person as they are online.

don




BoiJen -> RE: New to the Lifestyle ...or just online? (3/17/2008 1:22:14 PM)

Yeah I tend to not like those types of people either.

BTW I don't just scene...I live this D/s thing too...and service...every fuckin day. It's not about playing. Last time I checked you couldn't do someone else's dishes over the computer.




Page: <<   < prev  5 6 [7] 8 9   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875