WickedKev
Posts: 305
Joined: 11/26/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: leatherylace Where does actual slavery come into BDsM. The M/s dynamic was in black history was definatly not consensual. I once had a converstaoin with my mom (vanilla) who was saying that it was wrong and immoral to even act out consensually the M/s dynamic. You can't put todays morality upon history for morality changes. In Victorian England, it was legal that you could beat your wife with a stick as long as it was no thicker than your thumb, hence the term rule of thumb. Consenual I would say is a modern term, and because slavery back in history was forced, makes it no less valid. We still use ownership, and property terms only we did not buy them, our slaves gave themselves to us. There are many documented cases of slaves being fiercely loyal to Masters and Mistresses even defending them with thier lives, thier slavery may not have been consenual but do you think perhaps they found thier true selves within it? Keep gonig back to medieval times with the torture chambers, aspects of it we use today but not to the extremes they did back then. A part of BDSM no, but maybe one of the foundations, for we call where we play a dungeon, we use things like the rack, the stocks. the pillery post to name but a few. The differance is today we use them for pleasure, but without the purposes they were orginally used for would we have them today? Ok enough my head hurts now.....
< Message edited by WickedKev -- 9/29/2005 9:32:18 AM >
|