Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Homo-phobic and then some


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Homo-phobic and then some Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 3:55:31 PM   
Madame4a


Posts: 2045
Joined: 2/4/2008
From: Washington, DC area
Status: offline
amazing argument...

uh.. newsflash ... number of employees dictates cost of group health insurance, not WHO
another newflash ... homosexual couples are having AND adopting children all over the place

hello, welcome to the next century

(in reply to aviinterra)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 3:57:31 PM   
faerytattoodgirl


Posts: 5824
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

quote:

ORIGINAL: faerytattoodgirl

quote:

And I can get the Gender Recognition Certificate without having reassignment surgery.


you can get your m changed to an f without surgery?? holy shit... not here you cant...fat chance of that ever happening...im stuck with an M even though i am intersexed.




Hi Faery - yep, you just have to convince the Gender Recognition Panel that you've lived as female for a certain period or that for medical/age reasons it would be unreasonable to undergo SRS.

In the meantime its been no problem to get my driving licence changed (the numbers are ordered differently for M and F), passport, banking, utilities, insurance etc changed to show Ms or F. But my Birth Certificate says M, so it would be off to a male prison I'd go........ what fun!

I cant understand why with all the changes we've had here certainly, the intersexed seem to have been ignored and left behind whilst we're getting progress. Mind you its so difficult to get information on intersex matters so I dont know if my impression is accurate?

E


well the rules are so strict in canada due to all the suicides associated with transitioning weather it happen before srs or after.  so the gov't has made it near impossible to transition or change anything legal.  this started back in 1998.  previous to 1998 it was easy and covered fully by gov't.  now you have to fully transition and have surgery to get your M changed.  even though i am all F by birth..they wont change me.  i have to do what trans do.   and i am not going through their crap...that include 2 psychiatrists to say your not crazy!  do you know what the govt were spending previous to 1998 for this? like 200K! big whoop!



_____________________________

I did not reply to your cmail.
I am flawed.
Imperfect.
MUST SPANK!!!
SPAAAAAAAANK!!!

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 3:58:42 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thornhappy

I've read somewhere (maybe the lawyers can pipe up), that some civil unions lack the full effects of a marriage.

thornhappy



A buddy of mine thinks this is only on the "discussion"  FOR lawyers to have more  work.  i think he is abit alarmist.

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 4:18:33 PM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
This is all so sad. As is the fact that a gay couple can be together for decades, one of them gets sick, and has no legal say on the others' treatment, whearas the 'family' who chose to ignore the sick person for those decades all of a sudden wants to make those sorts of decisions.
Ridiculous.
And I've seen it happen.
People are people.
Black, white, gay, straight, bdsm or vanilla.
Surely, we can figure out if it's fair for one, then it's fair for all, right?
Is this really that difficult?

_____________________________

~Christina

A nice girl with a disturbing hobby

My femdom findom blog: http://www.MistressAvarice.com


(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:16:16 PM   
beargonewild


Posts: 22716
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DupedDom

Shoot em if they run, is a good philosophy, worked well when Frank Rizzo was mayor of Philadelphia.

I do not see any reaon why the state should not recognize same sex marriages. Churches, that is a different thing. A church should be able to choose who they marry, the state should have some provisions for people of the same sex that are long term partners and need to deal with property issues and other legal issues.

Call me a homo-phobe, I love my gay neighbors but I believe that the lifestyle is immoral.

I also have some guns that were handed down to me and I intent to keep them, in my home for protection.

And for the Bear, Breeder?? How many people in heterosexual relationships have sex for reproductions sake??? You like labels??? I can imagine that close minded people have alot of names for homosexuals as well.


DupedDom.....it is immaterial whether I like labels or not and I used those particular to get a point across. As a matter of info, chances are I have heard most derogatory names for everyone who is part of the LGBT community over the past 40 years. If you have an hour or two, I'd be more than happy to list them for you  *grins*


_____________________________

Do Not Rile da Chosen Bear

Promiscuous boy you already know
That I’m all yours what you waiting for?

Resident MANWHORE ~1000 Bear pts~

10 NZ points
Whips~n~Cuffs

(in reply to DupedDom)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:18:29 PM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
To the OP:

No offense, but that'a pretty "gay" looking photo for someone that is against gay marriages. 

You need a photo of yourself eating a steak, drinking a beer, driving a truck, skinning a deer, you know something like that. 

*For those with no sense of humor:  I AM KIDDING* 

< Message edited by slaveboyforyou -- 3/19/2008 5:24:42 PM >

(in reply to boytoy4female)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:26:00 PM   
Griswold


Posts: 2739
Joined: 2/12/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: boytoy4female

I happened to be in a chat room the other day, when someone said something about gay marriage. I stated I did not believe "marriage" should be available for homosexuals. I was immediately attacked, booted and called a homo-phobe.

(I'm shocked).

So for those small, closed minded individuals, let me also tell you what else I am. I am (a) male-phobic as I dont believe boys need to be in the girl scouts. I am (a) female phobic for the opposite reason.

I am a racist, because I dont believe anyone should be called a(n) african-american, japanese-american, etc. I think we should just all be (A)mericans.

I am a gun rights lunatic because I own a few guns, which I inherited; and I dont believe taking away the rights of the majority (comma) because a minority cant obey the rules.

I am a (N)azi because I think cops should be allowed to shoot you if you run.


(Couldn't have said it better m'se'f...I'm fairly confident you expressed yourself quite well).
 
(Even though you had a little trouble....uhhhmmmm....that is.....uhhhh....expressing yourself).

(Feeel better now?)

< Message edited by Griswold -- 3/19/2008 5:28:20 PM >

(in reply to boytoy4female)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:26:50 PM   
Gwynvyd


Posts: 4949
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: aviinterra

Most 'normal' people favor giving homosexual couples civil unions- that is, they get ALL the beneifts that 'normal' couples get at work and in govt. The word marriage has religious connections, hence it leads back to various churches, most of which view marriage as a sacred 'ok' for a couple to start having kids. Since two men or two women can't produce kids, they can't marry.


i am not nit picking here, and did not read the entire thread, but one statement here caught my eye. Marriage is the sacred ok to start having children and gays/lesbians can't have children so marriage is vetoed.
If there is a church out there that is hiding behind this then how can they justify marrying infertle couples? Should those men and women remain forever single?




it is with that school of thought that I would like to see the churches clamor for every straight infertile couples marriage to be instantly annuled.

It would never happen. Never.

Gay people can and do have children. I have a 10 year old with my partner. I am Mommie, she is Mama. Our Church sees us as equal parents. We are involved in the Religious Education Committee. I am on a couple of Boards at Church. Once things calm down I might finaly have a commitment ceromony with my girl in our church.

Just because *your* church doesnt reconize GLBT folks as equals... and say it is a sin doesnt mean it should be against the law.. and it doesnt mean every one, and every church thinks so.

Gwyn,
Happy to have found a wonderful and welcoming spiritual community

_____________________________

Self avowed Geek-Girl~
Come for the boobs, stay for the brains.

Be the kinda woman that when your feet hit the floor in the morning the Devil says "Oh shit, shes awake..."
~ Softandshy's "Shiney"

(in reply to sirsholly)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:28:16 PM   
beargonewild


Posts: 22716
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

To the OP:

No offense, but that'a pretty "gay" looking photo for someone that is against gay marriages. 

You need a photo of yourself eating a steak, drinking a beer, driving a truck, skinning a deer, you know something like that. 

*For those with no sense of humor:  I AM KIDDING* 


Don't forget the red plaid shirt   ROFLMFAO


_____________________________

Do Not Rile da Chosen Bear

Promiscuous boy you already know
That I’m all yours what you waiting for?

Resident MANWHORE ~1000 Bear pts~

10 NZ points
Whips~n~Cuffs

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:38:29 PM   
beargonewild


Posts: 22716
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: aviinterra

This reply is to no one in particular, just an observation on what I have been reading on this thread.
I have noticed that people tend to get upset when homosexual couples demand a right to marriage- note the use of the term marriage. Most 'normal' people favor giving homosexual couples civil unions- that is, they get ALL the beneifts that 'normal' couples get at work and in govt. The word marriage has religious connections, hence it leads back to various churches, most of which view marriage as a sacred 'ok' for a couple to start having kids. Since two men or two women can't produce kids, they can't marry. I kind of wonder at the insistance of the homosexual rights groups that the word marriage has to be used- it should properly be an insistance on the right to have civil unions, since that is what the govt. can give a couple. A church is a private thing, the govt. can't force it to marry just anybody.
As for the business aspect of this, I can see the rational of business owners not wanting to pay for more benefits, esp. the small employers. Hiring a worker is extremely expensive ( worker's comp, liability, benefits, etc.) that at some point it ceases to be helpful to the business and hence a job position is gone from the market ( in terms of large corps. moved overseas ). Each problem has two faces, either we go all capitalistic in our country, or go to a more social model, but being in between is not working currently.



The insistence of the gay rights activists wanting to use the term marriage is based on the premises that common law couples are considered married under the eyes of the government,  therefore they are accorded the rights and privileges they are entitled to. Simply put, we fought the same battle the common law couples fought 30 some years ago when they wanted their unions recognized and to gain some measure of legal protection with that union.



_____________________________

Do Not Rile da Chosen Bear

Promiscuous boy you already know
That I’m all yours what you waiting for?

Resident MANWHORE ~1000 Bear pts~

10 NZ points
Whips~n~Cuffs

(in reply to aviinterra)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:41:40 PM   
dcnovice


Posts: 37282
Joined: 8/2/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Since two men or two women can't produce kids, they can't marry.


Can a man and woman marry if one of them is infertile?

_____________________________

No matter how cynical you become,
it's never enough to keep up.

JANE WAGNER, THE SEARCH FOR SIGNS OF
INTELLIGENT LIFE IN THE UNIVERSE

(in reply to aviinterra)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:42:38 PM   
faerytattoodgirl


Posts: 5824
Status: offline
and two women can easily get preg...something called sperm bank.

_____________________________

I did not reply to your cmail.
I am flawed.
Imperfect.
MUST SPANK!!!
SPAAAAAAAANK!!!

(in reply to dcnovice)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 5:47:17 PM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
I am all for gay marriages, because I think gay weddings would be a great place to meet chicks.  Honestly, I am not kidding on that one.  My gay friends have FOXY looking gal pals.  So y'all invite me.  I will bring an awesome gift.  If it's an open bar wedding, I don't care if you are marrying a monkey.  By all means send me an invitation. 


(in reply to beargonewild)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 6:09:11 PM   
faerytattoodgirl


Posts: 5824
Status: offline
eh the girls at the gay weddings are almost always gay too you know.

_____________________________

I did not reply to your cmail.
I am flawed.
Imperfect.
MUST SPANK!!!
SPAAAAAAAANK!!!

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 6:21:04 PM   
Gwynvyd


Posts: 4949
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: faerytattoodgirl

eh the girls at the gay weddings are almost always gay too you know.


I think he is in search of the Fag hags...


Gwyn

_____________________________

Self avowed Geek-Girl~
Come for the boobs, stay for the brains.

Be the kinda woman that when your feet hit the floor in the morning the Devil says "Oh shit, shes awake..."
~ Softandshy's "Shiney"

(in reply to faerytattoodgirl)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 9:12:23 PM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

eh the girls at the gay weddings are almost always gay too you know.


No they're not. 

quote:

I think he is in search of the Fag hags...


Gwyn 


Nope wrong again.  Fag hags are generally ugly or emotional basket cases.  Most of the ones I know anyway. 

< Message edited by slaveboyforyou -- 3/19/2008 9:13:11 PM >

(in reply to faerytattoodgirl)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 9:21:13 PM   
Gwynvyd


Posts: 4949
Status: offline
Most Super Models are fag hags... I will hand it to you on the basket cases.. but then 80% of people are basket cases in general.. so balance it out...

you get a couple of oh dear gods.. your birth certificate was the Condom factories appolgy letter kinda gals.. but then I have seen loads and loads of ugly men who just knew they were Gods gift to women.

At least an ugly girl will give a decent blow job. Ugly men are generaly even less inept then thier more attactive counterparts. Which is saying something. You'd think they would brush up on thier skills and make themselves useful.

Gwyn,
yes I know I am going to hell for those last comments.. LOL

_____________________________

Self avowed Geek-Girl~
Come for the boobs, stay for the brains.

Be the kinda woman that when your feet hit the floor in the morning the Devil says "Oh shit, shes awake..."
~ Softandshy's "Shiney"

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 9:43:52 PM   
MasterWilliam55


Posts: 361
Joined: 1/27/2006
Status: offline
I don't want to overstate the obvious, but this is your thread. It's up to you to provide reasons for your position. Your statement left on its own sure sounds like gay-bashing to me. If your going to support gay intolerance, you should be providing the rational argument for your position.

(in reply to boytoy4female)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 9:52:16 PM   
MasterWilliam55


Posts: 361
Joined: 1/27/2006
Status: offline
Now were at it. Men and women Should always remain single. Don't you realize how many lawyers would be put out of work. We can't have that now can we?

(in reply to sirsholly)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: Homo-phobic and then some - 3/19/2008 9:52:21 PM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Gwynvyd

Most Super Models are fag hags... I will hand it to you on the basket cases.. but then 80% of people are basket cases in general.. so balance it out...

you get a couple of oh dear gods.. your birth certificate was the Condom factories appolgy letter kinda gals.. but then I have seen loads and loads of ugly men who just knew they were Gods gift to women.

At least an ugly girl will give a decent blow job. Ugly men are generaly even less inept then thier more attactive counterparts. Which is saying something. You'd think they would brush up on thier skills and make themselves useful.

Gwyn,
yes I know I am going to hell for those last comments.. LOL


Heh.. I've been called a fag hag more than a few times...

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to Gwynvyd)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Homo-phobic and then some Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 [5] 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.156