Lawrence111
Posts: 117
Joined: 6/10/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Leonidas Hmmmm. Most of those rules look like they're geared to online interaction. You know, a widely held definition of a D/s wannabe is someone who has little experience of D/s other than online interaction. Could well be that the writer of those rules would qualify. That said, there isn't really anything wrong with being a D/s wannabe. Every single someone who is a D/s "is" was a D/s wannabe at some point. The problem is when the "wannabe" claimes to be something that they are not. Unfortunately, there is a lot of social pressure on dominants to do just that. Nothing wrong with being a newbie sub. Not so for dominants. Take care of yourself Leonidas Bingo. I was going to say... seven years *on-line only*? That has to be some kind of record. I'd also agree: those look like ideas for cyber folks. (ASIDE: I had a friend who was in a three year on-line-only relationship, and there was nothing I could do to talk him into meeting local flesh-and-blood people. Finally, he met a nice lady and that was that; no more on-line. I was on-line for a couple of years, until I decided to do some local networking. It took *one week* and I discovered and was then invited to participate in a local group (and I live in a podunk town). So if I could get out of cyber because I wanted to, then anyone can. I could never have lasted seven years. One other piece of flame-bait (LOL): while I was on-line, I never considered myself to *really* be actively in 'the lifestyle' or 'experienced' ... because, I was never *really* doing anything, and had very little experience doing anything. I know some people say that's not true, that they *really are* doing the words and actions they are typing on a screen <when they type "My" in the middle of a sentence for me it is a dead-givaway that screams "Syy-burrrrr!" but that's another thread>, but from my experience, they are not usually the people who are doing it in the real world, and the latter tend to scorn the former as "play-school'. Before you fire off a heated response, I accept that there may be some who do both. My point is that those folks are rare; people seem to be most comfortable in one area or another.) Anyway, to each his/her own, but I would agree with some other posters: it's just words on a screen (unless *you* choose to make it more than that), so close the window and/or block the user, walk away, and try not to make it more than it is: words on a screen And I would agree that at sometime we were all new and curious and wanted to learn and therefore the term "want to be" could relate to "want to be more knowledgable" or "want to be more edicated." In that sense it is a kinder, gentler more acceptable phrase. The "wannabe" label (just by the way it sounds : "wanna - bee", sort of like "You want some whiiiine with that cheeze?") is a derogatory term given to those who are clearly not interested in self improvement, but instead *use* BDSM as a hunting ground, and *use* it for purposes that are other than Honorable. They deserve the phrase. And finally, I didn't thing anyone here had an "attitude" that was "less than sub" (to paraphrase) and will do just fine attracting those whom she wishes to attract. One of the biggest problems with on-line dating, especially in this focused world of BDSM is that we tend to look *first* as the D/s characteristics of a person rather than looking *at the person as a person.* (The other problem is that things go so damned fast that we are unable to take the time to get to know the person as a person.) Life ain't always a 24/7. You have to get along with your partner, person to person. And if one of you does not *like* the other person ... then you probably won't have a partner, unless it is the occasional play partner. I would venture a guess that most single people have a well-roundness to offer in themselves and want it in return. Sincerely, Lawrence Ithaca, NY
_____________________________
Yoda, my English Teacher was. *********** Question: What is the ONE creature that puts fear into the heart of a Gorian Warrior? Answer: "The Beast That Eats Only Male Virgins"
|