hopelesslyInvo
Posts: 522
Joined: 2/10/2008 From: the future Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrThorns I have never seen much appeal in that personality type myself. What specifically are they surrendering.. if everything they are is instantly overcome or overpowered? Give me an intelligent, bold, audacious, strong and ballsy woman who chooses to surrender herself to me. There's challenge and passion in that. despite my quoting you, i'm really just trying to speak in reply to the thread and all of its contents, this is just part of what i felt like addressing, i hate feeling like i'm trying to single someone out or come off as if i'm calling them out. but do you expect we would ever say things like give me a stupid, timid, weak, and scared little woman who second guesses herself to dominate me? intelligence is definitely another word such as worth and use that i don't see a connection with here at all. also "specifically", they are surrendering, even if in your eyes they have nothing else to give besides their "worthless" selves... they are giving the hardest thing to surrender, or maybe in a case like that they are rather "misplacing" it... which is trust. giving yourself and giving control is far easier to give than trust. whether submissives want to "be used" or "be of use", if someone feels they are of some use then they must also feel they are of some worth, so the people pointing fingers and truly believing they are worthless is pretty obviously not themselves. and what does "overpowering" have to do with submission in the first place? often times it's almost like there are loads of people looking for people who aren't submissive, to submit to them. should we submissives be annoyingly coy? should we refuse each things that is asked the first 30 times? asking or even notioning is enough for most of us. if i'm with a mistress and she asked for something of me, i'm not going to say "dream on bitch, you're going to have to work for it, what do you think i am? submissive?" i don't play such silly games, if me being submissive isn't what someone wants, i won't care if they try to fault me for it, i wasn't the one looking in the wrong place or trying to make someone into something that they aren't. and neither does being submissive mean you'll serve anyone who boasts they are a dom/me, or that time won't play into the relationship, or why and what you would do for them. i see dom/mes often enough saying things like "we're the ones who are supposed to be strong, to be supportive, to be the ones in control", why wouldn't the reverse seem logical? that the submissives are "supposed to be" in general more influential, unassertive, reserved, and in general, looked at as being "weak" in some way because of such traits. i mean the word "subservient" didn't change in it's definition overnight did it? there's not always if even ever "literally" a power exchange, but regardless would you look at someone as being a leech just because they draw motivation and strength from someone else? must we all be so independent that we are without care or concern for a relationship in the first place? are the words servile and submissive getting mixed together? people are so often talking about "not denying who you are and to accept it". so what if someone is shy, self conscious, passive, reserved, fallible, meek, kind, and maybe they don't even have high self esteem. they're supposed to accept who they are but for some reason be under belief and accept "that what they are" is worthless? they should just admire from afar and just keep dreaming of being happy? i know what they don't need is people trying to further beat this into their heads. isn't there a difference between low self esteem and being insecure? a difference between being impressionable and faceless? a difference between being frail and being emotionally unstable? a difference in physical and mental "strength" and a difference for the uses of them? a difference between the power to act and the fortitude to endure? a difference between motivation and desperation? a difference between being vulnerable and being weak? is it really so terrible for a submissive to live up to their name?
< Message edited by hopelesslyInvo -- 4/6/2008 8:44:12 PM >
|