Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/16/2008 4:33:00 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I didnt read that Carter snubbed Israel. I read he had visited a town hit by Hammas rockets. Making it personal can be solved by talks, just as well as violence, imo.

From what i have read the US want Fatah to have control, wouldnt that be interfering in a democratically elected government ? Part of the problem is too many outside parties have an interest.


Yes, it would be interfering, you're right. But the government won't support democracy in the territories if it means supporting Hamas.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/16/2008 4:37:50 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Exactly my point Level, and if the elected government ist supported by outside countries, then the public will continue to back that government, and perpetuate the cycle of violence.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/16/2008 4:42:45 PM   
Level


Posts: 25145
Joined: 3/3/2006
Status: offline
That's certainly one of the problems over there. The West wags their finger at them for so long regarding democracy, and when they have an election, and vote for a pack of jackals, we don't like it.

_____________________________

Fake the heat and scratch the itch
Skinned up knees and salty lips
Let go it's harder holding on
One more trip and I'll be gone

~~ Stone Temple Pilots

(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/16/2008 4:45:14 PM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

I didnt read that Carter snubbed Israel. I read he had visited a town hit by Hammas rockets. Making it personal can be solved by talks, just as well as violence, imo.

From what i have read the US want Fatah to have control, wouldnt that be interfering in a democratically elected government ? Part of the problem is too many outside parties have an interest.

Embracing a Hamas leader in public is pretty much a snub. As for making it personal...you're still talking about taking sides. There's nothing productive about taking sides when posturing as a peace broker. Not even when the person posturing is named Jimmy Carter.

_____________________________



(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/16/2008 5:15:38 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Im not talking about taking sides, i cant fathom how you think this way. It is personal because it has an effect on events here. That doesn`t mean i want  a soloution which fails to accomodate both sides.

Show me where i have mentioned taking anyones side. Not that you can.

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/16/2008 5:32:12 PM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Im not talking about taking sides, i cant fathom how you think this way. It is personal because it has an effect on events here. That doesn`t mean i want a soloution which fails to accomodate both sides.

Show me where i have mentioned taking anyones side. Not that you can.


You keep saying it's personal. That results in taking a side. You make it personal, you're on one side or another. The one place you are not is in the middle working to bring both sides together.

You don't have to want it that way. It's just how it is.

You want to be the broker in the middle, stay impersonal and objective.

_____________________________



(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/17/2008 2:37:40 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
Personal means i have a concern, taking sides is your slant not mine.

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/17/2008 6:47:03 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Level

That's certainly one of the problems over there. The West wags their finger at them for so long regarding democracy, and when they have an election, and vote for a pack of jackals, we don't like it.


Everyone forgets that Hamas wanted to negotiate with Israel when it came to power, Israel refused because Israel wanted Hamas to agree to its existance. Hamas said that could be the result of the negotiations but couldn't be the starting point. It is Israel that is doing far more murdering, torturing and incarcerating without trial than the Palestinians. Only the other day an Israeli assasination with airt to ground missiles caused 11 deaths, 5 children, 4 women. In another attack the Israelis killed a press cameraman and 2 innocent by-standers. All in one day. It is the Israelis that are criminally negligent and using terror and then the west calls the victims the terrorists. It is because of this sort of thing that west and particularly the US has no credibility in the ME amongst ordinary people. The US can buy the Arab leaders but they aren't buying the Arab public. For them, it is the US and the Israelis that are pack of Jackals.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 4/17/2008 6:48:13 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Level)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/18/2008 10:57:04 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
FR:

Rep. Myrick Calls for Former President Jimmy Carter’s Passport to be Revoked
(Washington, D.C.) – Today, Rep. Sue Myrick (NC-9) called on Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to revoke former President Jimmy Carter’s passport.  This is in response to the former President traveling to Syria to meet with Hamas, an organization officially designated by the United States as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

“Former President Carter has acted in contradiction of international agreements to isolate Hamas.  He has acted in defiance of both United States policy and international policy.  His actions reward terrorists, lend support, and provide legitimacy to their belief that violence will eventually get them what they want,” said Rep. Myrick.

After Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian parliamentary elections the Quartet (US, UN, EU and Russia) called on Hamas to renounce terror, recognize Israel and recognize the previous agreements between the Palestinian Authority and Israel as they seek an agreement to make peace.  Hamas has categorically rejected these three conditions for more than two years.

Congress granted the Secretary of State the power to grant and verify passports.  In 1981, the United States Supreme Court held in the case of Haig v. Agee that the Secretary of State has the implied power to revoke passports as well (453 U.S. 280).




_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/18/2008 3:09:20 PM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Personal means i have a concern, taking sides is your slant not mine.

Interesting definition you choose to employ, but so be it. You're concerned. I'm concerned. Carter is still a moron for talking to Hamas ex parte.

_____________________________



(in reply to Politesub53)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/18/2008 5:22:46 PM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
I agree Carter seems to have gone about this the wrong way. If he is hoping to be an intermediary of any sort, he needs to show a neutral stance. The fact still remains that Hamas was legitimately elected and the Palestinians dont see them as a terrorist organisation. This in itself is a stumbling block.

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 1:17:38 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

FR:

Rep. Myrick Calls for Former President Jimmy Carter’s Passport to be Revoked



(Washington, D.C.) – Today, Rep. Sue Myrick (NC-9) called on Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to revoke former President Jimmy Carter’s passport.  This is in response to the former President traveling to Syria to meet with Hamas, an organization officially designated by the United States as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

“Former President Carter has acted in contradiction of international agreements to isolate Hamas.  He has acted in defiance of both United States policy and international policy.  His actions reward terrorists, lend support, and provide legitimacy to their belief that violence will eventually get them what they want,” said Rep. Myrick.

After Hamas won the 2006 Palestinian parliamentary elections the Quartet (US, UN, EU and Russia) called on Hamas to renounce terror, recognize Israel and recognize the previous agreements between the Palestinian Authority and Israel as they seek an agreement to make peace.  Hamas has categorically rejected these three conditions for more than two years.

Congress granted the Secretary of State the power to grant and verify passports.  In 1981, the United States Supreme Court held in the case of Haig v. Agee that the Secretary of State has the implied power to revoke passports as well (453 U.S. 280).







As I said, Hamas wanted to negotiate with Israel, it rejected pre-conditions to negotiations which is all that article is saying. It doesn't say Hamas refused to negotiate with Israel.

But let's ask ourselves why the Palestinians voted in Hamas. It is because the previous Fatah government which now the US, Israel and the west regard as moderate, was completely and utterly undermined by the USA and Israel. Both Israel and the USA didn't stick to their side of the agreements they made with the former Palestian Authority which was why Fatah were voted out so it is the height of hypocrisy for Israel and the USA to demand a newly elected government to stick to agreements!

Let's ask another question, who insisted on democratic elections and who refuses to accept democracy? The USA, Israel and the EU.

But then as I keep telling everyone on these boards who think they are free, vote against the interests of the people that govern us and you too will find troops on the street telling you that they are saving you from extremism. Israel doesn't want peace because it would then have to consider giving back the lands it stole in its aggressive war (countenanced by the US) in 1967. Yeah, we know who the real extremists are and they are not the powerless Palestinians.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 4/19/2008 1:23:08 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 2:13:54 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: Politesub53

Personal means i have a concern, taking sides is your slant not mine.

Interesting definition you choose to employ, but so be it. You're concerned. I'm concerned. Carter is still a moron for talking to Hamas ex parte.


The real fear of people who refuse to talk to Hamas is that they will undo all the propaganda they have worked on dehumanising Hama and claiming they do not have a just cause. Talking to an enemy humanises them which is not what Israel, the USA or the EU want. Israel and the US claim to want to halt violence but both have been actively promoting it which was why Hamas came into existence as a resistance movement and eventually superceded Fatah who tried to negotiate with Israel and the US but were given empty promiese, double-dealed, undermined and repeatedly humiliated by convincing the Palestinians Israel was negotiating in good faith only for Israel to carry out yet more extra-judicial killings which tend to kill more innocent people than so called militants. Incarcerating people without trial, kidnapping, collective punishment through the destruction of houses (a criminal act), continued expulsion of Arabs from their land and land anexation and the rerouting of Palestinian water. All such acts which are breaking internatal law and offences under all human rights charters which Israel, the USA and EU countries are signitories. Talk about hypocrisy and double dealing. So muich for the rule of law.

Israel, the USA and the EU, really ought to look in the mirror, they are hypocrits and the monsters they claim Hamas to be. What is happening in the occupied territories is not unlike what the US did to the plains indians, lied, double dealed and murdered and all in the name of peace, civilisation and the rule of law. Fooey!

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 4/19/2008 2:19:48 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 4:55:27 AM   
seeksfemslave


Posts: 4011
Joined: 6/16/2006
Status: offline
Its clear to me that Israel is expecting that in the long run, just as stolen lands now are considered to be a legitimate part of  the USA, so stolen lands will be considered to be a legitimate part of Israel.

We are living during the transitional period.
Some at least can see the wrong that is being done.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 7:23:04 AM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
The real fear of people who refuse to talk to Hamas is that they will undo all the propaganda they have worked on dehumanising Hama and claiming they do not have a just cause.

Hamas is a terrorist group. That's not dehumanizing them, that's stating facts.

The Palestininans and the Israelis have to find a way to live together in peace. At some point, they have to talk to each other--and if Hamas is the voice the Palestinians want, then the Israelis are going to have to talk to them. It doesn't matter whether Hamas is a terrorist group or not at that point.

However, Israelis are the ones that need to talk to Hamas. Doesn't do any good for the US to talk to Hamas--Isarel is the only country that can do anything to address Palestinian grievances.

Carter's ex parte cozying up to Hamas won't bring either side closer to the negotiating table. It's not a question of who's right or wrong, but what will it take for both sides to talk.

Put another way--can Carter give the Palestinians anything they want? No. Only Israel can do that.

And that's not fear. That's fact.

_____________________________



(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 9:17:54 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
While you do bandy about facts, how about some other facts.

Nothing is going to change. The best thing for the Palestinians to do is to go into diaspora, something the Jews did a long time ago. It was the best tactical decision, because they could not win. Now the Palestinians can't win.

There is one basic tenet of strategy, it can be expressed a couple of different ways, but one is that he who turns and runs away lives to fight another day. A better way to express it would be that you should choose your battles wisely.

As long as around 30% of the world's economy can be used against them, no matter how up to the nose in debt, they can't win. They need to set their sights on somewhere they can live, because they can't live there.

If they can manage to survive, they probably won't have to wait as long as the Jews did to reconquer the region. This system of debt spending is going to cause the economy to topple. Perhaps if thePalestinian have some fight left in them they should go help the Tibetans or something.

I am sorry that I just don't know what to tell them. This shit is not right, but it is not my doing. And many people, even not Arab or Muslem take exception to the level of foreign aid from the US to Israel. I do.

We went and helped in WW2, we could have ignored it. The Balfour agreement was England I believe not us, but even if it was us, does it say we have to fucking support the country for their entire life ? Bullshit.

What was it last year, seven BILLION ? How fucking long do you think we can keep this up ? Let's do some quick math.

In the US 300,000,000 people.
A third have good reason not to work because they are young, in school.
That leaves 200,000,000
At least a fourth of the rest are retired, legally and vested during their working years.
That leaves 150,000,000
At least a fourth of who is left is either involuntarily unemployed or underemployed and many pay no income tax, or if they file get more back than they paid in because of EIC, but let's disregard EIC for now.
That leaves 112,500,000
Let's arbitrarily take out two million for people who are truly disabled and therefore do not pay taxes.
OK that's 110,500,000
To avoid supposition and err against myself, let's just assume for the moment that 10% of the population is either illeterate or somehow compromised which makes them unemployable in a meaningful way. Therefore if they even do work, they get EIC most likely.
That leaves 99,450,000
And if you then disclude public employees, because what they take from them ultimately comes from us, what does that leave ?

I think it reasonable to assume that in this country with 300,000,000 people, about 50,000,000 are actually productive in any meaningful way.

Now let's take six billion dollars and give it away. That's $240 each.

Now what is the ISREALI population of Israel ? Surely the Palestinians get none of that money. How much is it per person ? Just how important are these people that we are somehow sworn to protect even to any length ?

You want a fair decision, here it is. ThePalestinians leave, they find somewhere or go into diaspora. We consider the Balfour ordeal in perpetuity, like contract law fucks other people every day. In 99 years it is over. That would be about forty years. They could explore the desert. After all they are Semites I think. But comes about 40 years down the line they see the collapse of this entire empire. And then it is again their turn.

Do I think this is right ? NO. But it is the way it is.

So as such, I still respect Carter a bit for some things. And if you want to bitch about an uneventful Presidency, well maybe you should at the eventful Pesidency of the last eight years. But I agree this was simply an exercise in futility.

Carter has gone down a notch in my eyes, because at his age he should know that there is no solution. Like there was no solution to the conquering of the US from the Natives, there will be no solution to this.

And Israel not guarding Carter, it doesn't surprise me a bit. Nothing they do surprises me anymore. They wipe their ass with UN resolutions, and our dollars. They are expansionist meglomaniacs.

Mind you I am not talking about Jews, I am talking about the government of Israel. The US government does and has done petty much doing the same thing, just in a different way. So I no more attack them for their government's behaviour than I would US citizens for the actions of this government.

T



(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 9:23:33 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
The real fear of people who refuse to talk to Hamas is that they will undo all the propaganda they have worked on dehumanising Hama and claiming they do not have a just cause.

Hamas is a terrorist group. That's not dehumanizing them, that's stating facts.

The Palestininans and the Israelis have to find a way to live together in peace. At some point, they have to talk to each other--and if Hamas is the voice the Palestinians want, then the Israelis are going to have to talk to them. It doesn't matter whether Hamas is a terrorist group or not at that point.

However, Israelis are the ones that need to talk to Hamas. Doesn't do any good for the US to talk to Hamas--Isarel is the only country that can do anything to address Palestinian grievances.

Carter's ex parte cozying up to Hamas won't bring either side closer to the negotiating table. It's not a question of who's right or wrong, but what will it take for both sides to talk.

Put another way--can Carter give the Palestinians anything they want? No. Only Israel can do that.

And that's not fear. That's fact.


Hamas is less of a terrorist organisation than the Israeli state. Just look at the stats of the innocent dead.

As for giving anything to the Palestinians, well that is down to the US who claim no idfluence in the region despite having 200,000 troops there and bank rolling Israel. Pull the other leg, its got bells on.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 4/19/2008 9:24:17 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 11:17:18 AM   
celticlord2112


Posts: 5732
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
Hamas is less of a terrorist organisation than the Israeli state. Just look at the stats of the innocent dead.

As for giving anything to the Palestinians, well that is down to the US who claim no idfluence in the region despite having 200,000 troops there and bank rolling Israel. Pull the other leg, its got bells on.

*snort*

Israel is a nation. A recognized political entity, acknowledged as such by 99% of the world (Hamas and Hezbollah notwithstanding). They may be heavy handed in their responses to Hamas attacks....but what did Hamas expect when it started lobbing rockets into Israel?

No matter what your beknighted opinion is of Israel, the unalterable reality is they are the ones in a position to address Palestinian demands. Neither the US nor the EU can do that, no matter how much you ardently desire Israel to be an American lapdog--Israel does not blithely dance to an American or European tune.

If Hamas wants to prevail and gain something positive for the Palestinians, it will have to talk with Israel. There's not even a second alternative to that. Israel, for its part, is not going to talk with anyone that has as a basic principle is that Israel ought not to exist--one does not talk with the madman holding a gun at you wanting to pull the trigger.

_____________________________



(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 11:30:14 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
Hamas is less of a terrorist organisation than the Israeli state. Just look at the stats of the innocent dead.

As for giving anything to the Palestinians, well that is down to the US who claim no idfluence in the region despite having 200,000 troops there and bank rolling Israel. Pull the other leg, its got bells on.

*snort*

Israel is a nation. A recognized political entity, acknowledged as such by 99% of the world (Hamas and Hezbollah notwithstanding). They may be heavy handed in their responses to Hamas attacks....but what did Hamas expect when it started lobbing rockets into Israel?

No matter what your beknighted opinion is of Israel, the unalterable reality is they are the ones in a position to address Palestinian demands. Neither the US nor the EU can do that, no matter how much you ardently desire Israel to be an American lapdog--Israel does not blithely dance to an American or European tune.

If Hamas wants to prevail and gain something positive for the Palestinians, it will have to talk with Israel. There's not even a second alternative to that. Israel, for its part, is not going to talk with anyone that has as a basic principle is that Israel ought not to exist--one does not talk with the madman holding a gun at you wanting to pull the trigger.


Without a just peace Israel's future depends on the fortune of its financial backer, the USA. At the moment it feels it gains more by not talking to its enemies because the US supports Israel's crimes.

http://www.vialls.com/wecontrolamerica/WarCrimes.html

With the rise of China and India, the US power will diminish. It is in Israel's interest to talk from strength but if its too stupid to, that's its business.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to celticlord2112)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter - 4/19/2008 11:33:41 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
celtic, the government of Israel is recognized as a terrorist group by those who can see.

T

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Israel refused to guard Jimmy Carter Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094