RealityLicks
Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/23/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Politesub53 This would sound better if the total extra cost, was returned in taxes. That isnt the case though, VAT, Income Tax and Capital Gains Tax, are only a proportion of the money skimmed off. Sure, if a contractor earns another £10k a year he pays more income tax, but only at 40p in the pound. The other 60p stays in his pocket, the same happens with the CGT and VAT along the chain. Which ever way you look at it, the taxpayer foots the bill for the corruption. Of course, you are right. It's immediately apparent that this practice is carried out in pursuit of profit and not due to the risible notion that the construction companies are being hard done by. All the big firms post large, successive annual profit increases. There's something deeply immoral about the way we habitually ignore white-collar crime yet read page after page in the news about petty crime. Why is it that the same tinpot theorists, who drone on with "solutions" for disorder in the streets, are meanwhile buffing the toecaps of our country's true criminals? Some are too old, some too nervously intransigent to deal with a fairly blatant reality. Excusing crime at the "top" of society is the number one cause of disrespect for the law at the "bottom". The plebs now know what their bosses are really all about and no-one can get that genie back in the bottle. It follows that if you wish to reduce the effect, you should first tackle the cause but something tells me there's a bit of mileage yet in the hypocrisy and indignation lark. Pointless? Definitely - but it feels so good.
|