atursvcMaam
Posts: 1195
Joined: 5/10/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou I being the pessimist I am, do not think any viable alternatives to fossil fuels is coming soon. Ethanol uses up too much land and uses too much energy to be feasible. Biodiesel also uses up too much agricultural land. We need that land for food production. Wind power is okay, but you need a lot of land to do it unless you do it off-shore. I haven't seen any of the coastal states rushing to have wind turbines off their coasts. Hydroelectric power is fine, but you have to alter the environment to do it. Damning up rivers and streams is not good for the environment, and the electricity produced is limited. Of course there is the idea of using tides to generate power, but that's extremely expensive at the moment and the technology isn't perfect. We still don't know what effect tidal generators would have on sea life. We do produce a lot of waste, so there is methane. But, methane is a pollutant. Hydrogen sounds good, but takes massive amounts of power to make. Solar sounds great, and I would even like to have a few of those solar panels on my roof. But completely relying on it for our massive power needs would be way too expensive and ineffiecient. In the end, we are left with petroleum, coal, and natural gas. We are going to be reliant on all of them until I am an old man. I think we will find ways to use them more efficently and with less environmental impact. But we aren't going to be off of fossil fuels anytime in the near future. i have a great deal of respect for those who work within the box, and have always admired those who can think outside the box, but have always been amazed when the box is the solution.
_____________________________
live hard, die young and leave a good looking corpse when you die. Love ya, but, when the zombies start chasing us, i am tripping you. The glass is always full, the question is, "with what?"
|