Hissltora
Posts: 41
Joined: 8/23/2007 Status: offline
|
**FR** Yes, i've been around girls like that, and yes, i did find it uncomfortable that she didn't understand why i wouldn't join in her 'fun' (interrupting, being flippant to her owner, telling embarassing stories, not staying in one place) . She really thought that misbehaving for attention wasn't all that bad, and that Sir really wouldn't mind, i mean, hell, her's didn't, and he was the Uber-Dom in her eyes. *rolls eyes* Sir did not reply to any of her comments or actions, and when at one point she turned to me and asked what His deal was, He looked down and said He refused to acknowledge little girls in an adult setting. She pouted and turned to her owner, who gave her a stern look and continued the conversation. i shrugged and said she brought it on herself, perhaps she would think next time before starting up her antics. In the case that RavenMuse was using for illustrating purpose, she should have been immediately rebuffed. Not necessarily for any protocol issues, that can differ as far as night v day, but the fact she was invading others' space and physically accosting them, with the arm hair pulling... THAT is major misbehavior edging towards grievance. Would anyone cheerfully chuckle and say, "What a cute puppy!" if said puppy was painfully gnawing on a guest's hand? So why should the sentient human girl-sub not be held to at least a similar standard?! A common vanilla etiquette standard? My best friend is a weekend kinkster, and doesn't fully grasp the depth that my orientation runs through me, and through Sir. At first, when trying to rearrange plans due to restrictions imposed by Sir, she became frustrated and demanded to know why i was tolerating it, why i didn't just blow Him off and beg for mercy later. i answered simply "Not all pain is good, especially the kind i get from disappointing Him." Huge gulf of difference! Any of this help? slave tora, devoted to Sir N
|