CreativeDominant -> RE: Dominants & Self Importance (4/23/2008 12:04:16 PM)
|
Actually, your observation of others and your own words regarding their behavior...you are turned on by self-importance in the short-term but not in the long-term sounds like a twist on the bait and switch...instead of them offering up bait for one thing and then switching it to another, it sounds like the most appealing thing to you...the fish, as it were...is for them to bait the hook with one thing and really get you going and then, when you...the submissive...gets tired of it, you want them to switch their behavior to what you...the submissive...want. You want them to present a front that is false because, even though it may be part of them, it should not...in your estimation...be the long-term, major portion of them BUT, you want to have that "turn-on" factor first. It also sounds like a lot of those women who admit they want the bad boy and then, once they have the bad boy, they want to change them completely into what they find desirable...which in most instances is everything the bad boy is not. Why not just find the one with those characteristics you want? Let's admit it...because to many people, those type of people with desirable, long-term characteristics are ...in many though not all instances...not just as subconsciously, instantaneously stimulating as the bad boys or the self-important or the arrogant or the extremely beautiful types. In a way, my ex-wife was a bait-and-switch type...offering up one sort of thing as pretty much a guarantee in exchange for something else and then snatching the bait away in bigger and bigger chunks while expecting me to maintain my bite on the hook. It took me awhile but I did finally ask myself why I should stay on the hook when there was nothing of the original taste left in the bait that was left. I have to wonder...is it possible that what you see as "Self-Importance" is just the dominant tendency to self-assurance? Most dominants I know, including myself...be they arrogant or humble...had a self-assurance about them. That seems to bother a lot of vanilla folk and even some submissives which I find a bit perplexing: if you want a dominant to not only be in control of their own life but able to control others, would you not think that they would have developed self-assurance along the way in order to be able to do so?
|
|
|
|